Preview

Liquidation Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2445 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liquidation Law
-------------------------------------------------
COMPANY LIQUIDATION - REFORMS AND RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW
INTRODUCTION
The remit of Working Group D (Insolvency and Corporate Securities) of the Corporate Law Reform Committee (CLRC) is to consider the current law and practice relevant to corporate insolvency. The objective of the review of this area of the law is for the creation of a corporate insolvency framework: * that is facilitative to the winding up of companies where there is no prospect of the business becoming profitable and viable; * that is able to provide an efficient system to rehabilitate companies where appropriate; * that is able to ensure the protection of rights of creditors and members by providing enforcement mechanisms that may be accessed without undue delay or difficulty; * that ensures accountability of the persons involved in the process and transparency of the process itself.
This Consultation Paper focuses on the reform and restatement of the liquidation scheme. The laws and procedures on winding up are necessary parts in the operations of a company since the law and procedure will enable proper closure of a company which may not be able to continue its business. The review conducted by Working Group D of the CLRC in relation to the liquidation process starts on the premise that the law and procedures for company liquidation are well-known and familiar to practitioners. Thus, the gist of this structure will be retained. However, in line with simplification of the law, the review focuses on the following areas:
(a) Reform and restatement of the law on company liquidation - There are specific recommendations made in relation to the following: * Commencement of winding up and termination of winding up; * Review of void and voidable dispositions, undue preference transactions, effect of floating charges and liquidator’s right of recovery under section 295; * The powers and duties of a liquidator and interim

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What are some of the essential features of the FDICIA of 1991 with regard to the resolution of failing Depository Institutions?…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Acc 556 Week 1

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    6. Targeted reviews of any public company that announces restructuring liability reserves, has any major…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bankruptcy Midterm

    • 3520 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Chapter 7 – provides for liquidation proceedings or the selling of all nonexempt assets and the distribution of the proceeds to the debtor’s creditors.…

    • 3520 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bsbwor501 Quiz 1

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A company in the process of liquidation is considered to be under the going concern assumption.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If the company decided to appoint an insolvency practitioner it can be an excessive reason for apprehension for the creditors of the company, as it is generally a suggestion of the end of any company. At this point the debtor company which is Dick Smith Holdings PVT Ltd is most probable in serious financial trouble so the company should know the main differences between liquidations, administrations and also receiverships. And the most important part is how these situations can mainly affect the creditors of the subject company.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Solutions Chapter 7

    • 7531 Words
    • 30 Pages

    CHAPTER 7 CORPORATIONS: REORGANIZATIONS SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS Status: Q/P Question/ Learning Present in Prior Problem Objective Topic Edition Edition 1 LO 1 IRS Letter Ruling Unchanged 1 2 LO 1 Reorganizations follow tax law Unchanged 2 3 LO 1 Types of reorganizations Unchanged 3 4 LO 2…

    • 7531 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ac 201 Quiz

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    2.|Closing entries are required: A.|if management has decided to cease operating the business.|B.|only if the company adheres to the accrual method of accounting.|C.|if a company's bookkeeper forgets to prepare reversing…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rio Tinto Closure Standards

    • 3508 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Closure Standard 1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2. 3. 3.1 4. 5. Planning Knowledge Base Closure Strategy Closure Management Plan Decommissioning Plan Implementation and Operation Performance Measurement Closure Cost Reporting Relevant documents Revision History 3 4 4 4 5 7 8 8 8 10 11…

    • 3508 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The buyer may lose the right to revoke or reject goods that are nonconforming by failing to inspect them in a timely manner. When the buyer accepted the goods, signifies to the seller or lessor in words or by conduct that the good are conforming or that the goods will be taken despite their nonconformity.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cs date sheet

    • 344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Corporate Restructuring Insolvency (Module-II) NO EXAMINATION NO EXAMINATION NO EXAMINATION Securities Laws and Compliances (Module-II) Advanced Tax Laws and Practice (Module-III)…

    • 344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    buzzle

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: This case concerned the collapse of a company that operated a number of retail stores that sold predominantly Apple products (authorised Apple resellers). The company (Buzzle) had been created as a result of numerous earlier companies merging their Apple reselling businesses into the new company. In order to achieve this Buzzle needed the approval of Apple to swap its existing supply contracts and credit contracts with the companies to new contracts with the merged entity Buzzle. At the time of the merger Buzzle represented a large percentage of Apple’s sales in Australia. Apple was therefore concerned about the viability of new merged entity’s business and made detailed requests to Buzzle before it would give approval. Apple’s Australian finance director (Likidis) had detailed negotiations with Buzzle management and maintained an office in Buzzle’s headquarters. When Buzzle collapsed into liquidation, the liquidator took action against Apple and Likidis on the basis that they were shadow directors and/or otherwise officers of Buzzle. If they were directors of Buzzle then it may have been possible for them to be liable for insolvent trading (s588G). If they were officers it would have been possible to avoid security that Apple had taken over Buzzle and its property (under prior s267-see now s588FP). The liquidator also sought to argue that Apple was party to uncommercial transactions under s588FB (this is outside the scope of this topic). The trial judge found that neither Apple nor Likidis were directors or officers of Buzzle.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sec. 332, I.R.C. 1954, applicable to avoid recognition of gain on liquidation of subsidiary. Taxpayer owned 80% of the stock of the subsidiary on the date of the adoption of the plan of liquidation within the meaning of sec. 332(b). The respondent argues that at the time of the adoption of the liquidation, the petitioner did not owned more than 80% of the subsidiary’s stock. Therefor, no Sec. 332 benefit should be taken, resulting in a deficiency in petitioner's income tax for the taxable year ended March 31, 1969, in the amount of $589,882.28. On the other hand, petitioner contends that the plan of liquidation was adopted after the ownership of 80% of the subsidiary. In addition, the petitioner also contends that Section 332 is an elective section and a taxpayer, by taking appropriate steps, can render that section applicable or inapplicable.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liquidation is Different from Insolvency. The term ‘insolvency’ is applicable to individuals, partnership firms, Hindu Undivided families whereas, the term ‘Liquidation’ is applicable to a joint Stock Company. But it may be mentioned that the insolvency of a company is not a necessary condition for its Liquidation whereas an individual, partnership firm, Hindu Undivided family is said to be insolvent when liabilities exceed assets or has committed an act of insolvency. A solvent company can also be liquidated. Another difference between insolvency and Liquidation is that the former is governed by the insolvency act and the latter is governed by the Companies Act.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Aspects of Business

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The objective of the course is to acquaint the management students with the basic fundamentals of business related laws and to understand its linkages with other fields of management which have significant bearing on business organization…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Siri

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Address: Flat F, 4/F, 119-125 Caine Road, Hong Kongii• Email: Yangdominic@hotmail.com • Tel: (852) 9206-0970…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics