Preview

Lincoln Electric Student Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7431 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lincoln Electric Student Example
Keys to High Performance In the assigned case study we see the history of Lincoln Electric and the success it has had with innovative leadership techniques found in companywide quality management, or Theory Z (Houser, 1995). Through the use of well executed human resource management practices (Schuler & MacMillan, 1984), Lincoln Electric has created a competitive advantage through the use of its people (Summers, 1994), which accounts for its high performance over the years. The way a company organizes and manages its workforce has increasingly become a source of competitive advantage (Summers, 1994), and for Lincoln it is no different. Lincoln Electric’s competitive advantage is their most positive aspect revealed in the assigned case study that is embodied through its rewards system and human resource management techniques, along with quality management techniques of value innovation and continual cost reductions to make Lincoln so successful, even through hard economic times. Competitive advantage has continually shifted over time. What is an advantage today may not be tomorrow; however, it seems that in the assigned case study that Lincoln Electric has created a system that makes the competition nearly irrelevant (Pfeffer, Hatano, & Santalainen, 1995). Competing in an industry that is highly price-competitive and where price variations on standard items amounts to only one to two percent it immediately creates a realization that to sustain continual high performance, Lincoln Electric must have a business model built on creating a continual competitive advantage (Lincoln Electric, 1994). A competitive advantage is formed when a firm can add value through a strategy that isn’t being simultaneously implemented by a competitor or is able to do so where another firm has failed to duplicate the benefits of such strategy (O’Shannassy, 2008). The human resource techniques used at Lincoln Electric are a major key to its success and are what has helped drive Lincoln


References: Creating holistic time-off programs can significantly reduce expenses, Hewitt survey finds. (2007). CPA Practice Management Forum, 3(2), 17-17,23. Lincoln electric company (the). (1994). Waltham, United States, Waltham: North American Case Research Association.  Akhigbe, A., & Easterwood, J Appelbaum, S. H., & Santiago, V. (1997). Career development in the plateaued organization. Career Development International, 2(1), 11-11. Beer, M., Cannon, M Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., LePine, M. A., & Moynihan, L. M. (2003). Individual job- choice decisions and the impact of job attribute and recruitment practices: A longitudinal field study. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 23-23. Bronars, S. G., Deere, D. R., & Tracy, J. S. (1994). The effects of unions on firm behavior: An empirical analysis using firm-level data. Industrial Relations, 33(4), 426. Brown, M. G. (1992). Paying for quality. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 15(5), 38-38. Campbell, D. J., & Campbell, K. M., Chia, H. (1998). Merit pay, performance appraisal, and individual motivation: An analysis and alternative. Human Resource Management (1986- 1998), 37(2), 131-131. Danvila del Valle, I., Ángel Sastre Castillo, M., Rodríguez-Duarte, A. (2009). The effects of training on performance in service companies. International Journal of Manpower, 30(4), 393-407. Elmuti, D., Tück, B., & Kemper, F Fawcett, S. E., Rhoads, G. K., & Burnah, P. (2004). People as the bridge to competitiveness: Benchmarking the "ABCs" of an empowered workforce. Benchmarking, 11(4), 346-360. Greasley, K., Bryman, A., Dainty, A., Price, A., Naismith, N., & Soetanto, R Guthrie, J. P. (2000). Alternative pay practices and employee turnover: An organization economics perspective. Group & Organization Management, 25(4), 419-439. Hansson, B. (2007). Company-based determinants of training and the impact of training on company performance. Personnel Review, 36(2), 311-331. Hardy, C., & Leiba-OSullivan, S Harrington, H. J. (1998). Performance improvement: The downside to quality improvement (the surplus people problem). TQM Journal, 10(3), 154-154. Harris, C., & Kleiner, B. H. (1993). Motivational practices at america 's best managed companies. Management Research Review, 16(9), 1-1. Houser, H. F. (1995). Companywide quality management. Personnel Psychology, 48(1), 236- 236. Hsiao, F., & Kleiner, B. H. (2002). How to hire employees effectively. Management Research Review, 25(1), 49-59. Katz, J Kauhanen, A., & Piekkola, H. (2006). What makes performance-related pay schemes work? finnish evidence. Journal of Management & Governance, 10(2), 149-149. Leavy, B Lockwood, D. L., Frayne, C., Stephenson, H., & Geringer, J. M. (2010). The impact of contingent time off on productivity in a small manufacturing environment. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 3, 1-15. Long, R Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89-96. Martin, G., Pate, J., & Beaumont, P Morand, D. A. (2010). The social psychology of status leveling in organizational contexts. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 18(1), 76-104.  Morkel, A., & Posner, B O’Shannassy, T. (2008). Sustainable competitive advantage or temporary competitive advantage. Journal of Strategy and Management, 1(2), 168-180. Pfeffer, J., Hatano, T., & Santalainen, T. (1995). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(1), 55-55. Schuler, R Shepard, E., & Clifton, T. (2000). Are longer hours reducing productivity in manufacturing? International Journal of Manpower, 21(7), 540-552. Snell, S Sorensen, J.,B., & Sorenson, O. (2007). Corporate demography and income inequality. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 766-783. Stevens, J. M. (2001). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(7), 809-811. Summers, L. (1994). Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force. Personnel Psychology, 47(3), 630.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Uma S. N (2013) A study on training importance for employees of their successful performance in the organization. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) Volume 2 Issue 11, November 2013…

    • 2281 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hr590 Final Project

    • 2368 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Hellerman, mynra. "Executive Compensation Decision Making." Sibson Consulting. The Segal Group, n.d. Web. 20 Oct 2012. .…

    • 2368 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jimmy Hoffa and Unionism

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force. Boston: Harvard Business School.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Henderson, R. I. (1998). Compensation management: rewarding performance. ( 2nd Ed.). Reston Pub. Co.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you develop a staffing plan for the organization in which you work, or one with which you are familiar. Determine how many people you need to hire…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ready, D., Sylvers, P., Worley, V., Butt, J., Mascaro, N. & Bradley, B. (2012). The impact of…

    • 9226 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln Electric

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Which ten features of Lincoln Electric’s human resources and compensation policy do you find most noteworthy?…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lincoln's competitive advantage lies mainly in its effective compensation and benefits system which put forth three main elements to spearhead the company's efforts. The trinity of elements comprised of piecework, bonus system and guaranteed employment. Piecework provided workers with a sense of autonomy in that now, workers can earn as much as they are willing to work for. The bonus levels in Lincoln far exceeded those of industry peers and were based on their contributions in the form of output, ideas, cooperation, dependability and quality. Consequently, the benefits provided by Lincoln were not extensive as they saw higher wages as substitutes for things such as insurance, and workers were also in a better position to decide their own benefits. All these elements combined gave workers a sense of ownership in the company and motivated them to work harder as entrepreneurs rather than mere workers. It also helped that Lincoln's managers strove to build a sense of trust with the workforce thereby reducing the need to form unions as well as enhancing their willingness to abide by company policies. This willingness is extremely important in James Lincoln's philosophy of offering guaranteed employment as a means to attain higher efficiency as workers are able to adjust to different economic situations by their willingness to modify their working hours and job designations. The trinity combined resulted in high productivity with an output 3 times higher than competitors with just half of their workforce. Coupled with the fficiency from continuous improvement in production process, employee effort and a seven-day-a-week equipment utilization meant Lincoln managed to generate huge cost savings. On top of that, Lincoln passed the cost savings on to its customers which created very high demand. The profits are then passed back to the workers, motivating them and sealing up a hugely successful strategic cycle…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Garno, Jessica L., Joseph F. Goldberg, Paul Michael Ramirez, and Barry A. Ritzler . "Impact of…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Southwest Airline case study

    • 2348 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The sustainability of competitive advantage depends on three conditions, the first is the particular source of the advantage, secondly sustaining advantage requires change, it demands that a company exploit, rather than ignore industry trends, it also demands that a company invest to close off the avenue along which competitors could attack and lastly, to sustain its position a firm may have to destroy old advantages to create new higher ones. (Portal, 1990)…

    • 2348 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Organizational Politics

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Porfeli, Erik J and Vondracek, Fred W. (2001). Career Development, Office Politics, and Occupational Success, Chapter 14.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lincoln Electric (LE) has been a producer of electrical and welding technology products since the late 1800's. The company remained primarily a family and employee held company until 1995, then approximately 40% of its equity went to the public. James Lincoln, one of the founders, developed unique management techniques that effectively motivated the employees. These management techniques were implemented as an unusual (for the era) structure of compensation and benefits called "incentive management". The incentive management system consisted of four key areas: factory jobs based solely on piecework output; a year-end bonus that could equal or exceeded an individual's regular pay; guaranteed employment; and limited benefits. Management successors to James Lincoln continued with this successful philosophy even during hard times. This incentive system provided Lincoln Electric with a significant competitive advantage over its domestic competitors. This incentive system plus the bonus allowed Lincoln employees to earn more than their counterparts at other firms, which contributes to employee motivation. One additional aspect of Lincoln's incentive system was that of limited benefits. James Lincoln developed a system of minimal company paid benefits, where he rationalized that; fewer benefits would equate more funds available for employee bonus and compensation. The successful incentive program and participative management style provided an environment where a Lincoln plant could produce many times (up to three times-with half the personnel) that of a similar manufacturing plant. The employee involvement program and the incentive program at Lincoln were significant contributors to their capability to maintain a solid reputation as a high quality producer, which has driven brand loyalty.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Strategic Human Resource (SHRM) management is human resource management with a strategic edge, linking both business strategy with human resource (HR) strategy of an organization. Human resource management has become an integral part of almost all the companies all over the world. Human resource management concerns not only how peoples are managed but also how managing people could maximize the competitive advantage in that market sector (Tyson, 1991 p2). Business strategies are defined as a strategy of a particular business unit (Tyson 2000, p66). Human resource(HR) strategy is a series of policies and programs designed to achieve a people management objective (Tyson, 2000 p66) .SHRM on a broader term is a overall sense of mission and direction, an appreciation in general terms of where the company is going and why. This may include articulation of core values, distinctive competencies and corporate vision. SHRM also focuses on translating the complex and dynamic set of internal and external variables, which an organization faces, into a future oriented framework which can then be implemented on a day to day basis (Watson, 1999). In the subsequent paragraphs, This study tries to explain why and how different automobile companies adopt different business and HR strategies. For this study focuses on works of two authors Porter (1980) who has classified business competitive strategy into three types: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus and of that of Schuler and Jackson (1987) who has classified business strategy into three types: cost reduction, innovation, and quality enhancement (Huang 1999). At the end it would try to reach at an particular point where by the help of the practical and secondary data it can identify the best HR and Business practices.…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Competitive advantage is a management concept that has been so popular in the contemporary literature of management nowadays. The reasons behind such popularity include the rapid change that…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Kong, Elizabeth W.Y, 2011. People as Valuable Asset in Organisations. [Online]. Available at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/51823070/Human-capital-is-arguably-the-most-valuable-asset-held-by-an-organization-today [Accessed 11 November 2012].…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays