Preview

Limiting Speech

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
229 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Limiting Speech
This is, of course, a matter of opinion. My own view is that free speech in schools must surely be limited. However, I do agree with cases like Tinker which hold that students do have some rights to free speech.
If students had an absolute freedom of speech, schools would be chaos. If we could not prevent students from (to take an absurd example) yelling out whatever they want in the middle of class, we would have no way of keeping control of the school and it would be impossible to educate students. Similarly, imagine if students were allowed to say whatever they wanted in the context of a class discussion. We can imagine students using offensive racist language or sexually explicit language. This would have a terrible impact on education.
However, it is still important to protect student free speech rights to some degree. Schools need to help prepare students to be good citizens and good citizens need to be able to express their political opinions. Therefore, I agree with the Court’s holding in Tinker. In that case, the Court said that schools have to have a very good reason to limit student speech. They cannot simply ban the speech because they do not like it. I agree wholeheartedly with this even though I think that we should never allow students to have complete freedom of speech.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, this protection is not without limits. There is still a professional duty to protect confidentiality and not cause disruption to the operation of a school. Basically, teachers do not have carte blanche freedom of speech if it can be proven to be or create a substantial disturbance within the school community. Because Pickering was able to show the court that he thought his statements were true, I believe there seemed to be a lack of malice on his part. The Board of Education asserted at every level of the court system that his statements were unjustified, and damaged the reputations of its members (Essex, 2012). I agree with the decision and think the case lacked the evidence that his words even if untrue or unfounded really affected students and school as a…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case established limitations on our 4th amendment right under school property. The majority opinion should be right one because in order to…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should a principal or other school authority be able to silence other forms of student speech? If so, under what conditions? How does speech by an individual student differ from speech by the school newspaper?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, after viewing North Fargo High School’s student handbook, Mr. Renville’s senior portrait clearly violated the school guidelines which state: “No student will knowingly possess, handle, carry, or transmit any weapon or dangerous instrument in any school building, on school grounds, in any school vehicle or at any school-sponsored activity.4” .The image Renville provided clearly violates the school guidelines and does not pass the “Tinker Test”, therefore the ruling delivered in Tinker v Des Moines independent Community School District does not apply to the supposed infringement on Renville’s freedom of speech…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why judges voted YES is because they say that Childrens are not necessarly guaranteed the full extent of the First Amendment. They add that the students did not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tinker v. Des Moines, New Jersey v. T.L.O., and Ingraham v. Wright are just three Supreme Court cases about student rights. The first one, the Tinker v. Des Moines is a case that took place in 1965. The issue of this case was the freedom of speech in school. It all started on one day when John and Mary Beth Tinker along with their friend Chris Eckhardt chose to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. School officials told them to take off the bands, but they refused. In effect they were suspended from their high school in Des Moines, Iowa. All their parents sued the school district, because they claimed it was a violation of the First amendment, the right of freedom of speech. The significance of this case is having a right to express yourself. The court limited the right of self expression. They limited the right by not giving students unlimited self expression. Another way they limited it was by explaining that if the act of…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opinion: I agree with the majority on this one, we as students do not lose our rights when we enter the school and we should be allowed to demonstrate within the school as per our first amendment right. The school system does not have the authority to dictate our…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hazelmeier Case Summary

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was simple to me. The school newspaper is about representing the whole school, not individual students themselves. Both sides could agree that the students were presenting their own views, but then this is where the sides start to split. The minority believed that since the students were expressing their own views, that the Tinker standard should apply. But, this was not applied because the students are not suppose to use the school newspaper as a public forum for discussion. The school newspaper is suppose to represent the whole school, and not just those writers. Therefore, the principal was doing nothing wrong by restricting the student’s rights when he censored and prevented the release of the articles in the…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines five brave students decided to wear black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam War. Even though they were threatened with suspension they still decided to wear them. They got suspended until they would agree to not wear the armbands but still wore all black clothes to school for the rest of in year. Students should be able to protest in schools because of the first amendment, their opinions matter just as much as adults, and while some think they should students don’t just give up their constitutional rights just because they’re at school.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Garner Vo-Tech Case Study

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Schools may regulate student speech that results in a material and substantial disruption within the school. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 509, 513 (1969). Garner Vo-Tech must show either that there was an actual disruption within the school or that officials reasonably anticipated a material and substantial disruption was likely to occur. Alternatively, the Court could expand the exception found in Morse that waives the disruption requirement and include speech that calls for the bullying and harassment of a specific student. Morse v. Fredrick, 551 U.S. 393, 407 (2007).…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the suppression of free thinking by the government it, in a way, disrupts the original intent of the Framers and of the Constitution, which was to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty, as outlined in the Preamble. Those who believe in these ideals of the Constitution should also believe in the allowance of student expression in schools because they are directly…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states that only if a person’s speech has substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others it may be censored. Most people take that how it is supposed to be taken. If you actually read the law, it is easy to see that many things…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tinker's didn't do anything to effectively mess with the learning in the school, so they didn't stop the school from doing their job, and they were able to maintain their rights. In the Fraser case, Fraser openly made sexual jokes in front of the whole school, as their representative. He did so in a way that was hard for the school to justify that what he did was too inappropriate for the school. His goal was to be funny, without real justification for what he was doing. The Supreme Court decided that what he did, did prevent the school from doing their job. Therefor he had his free speech largely effected in school, while common good was thought to be improved with this decision. Fraser in order to prevent anything like his situation again they made it obvious that free speech in school can be restrained in order to keep the learning environment. In the Tinker case the judges left the case open for discipline on students who "interfere with the work of the school or impinge upon the rights of other students." Which means that they narrowed the spectrum onto where the schools can interfere with individual rights, and where they can't. In the Fraser case, these same principals are applied, saying "The First Amendment does not prevent the school officials from determining that to permit a vulgar and lewd speech, such as respondents would undermine the school's basic educational mission." Fraser's speech was thought…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    But limiting online speech that is done outside of school is not one of them. Limiting online speech especially if it is done outside school. It is jeopardizing 1st amendment freedom of speech rights. Also cyberbullying is not a widespread problem and cyberbullying is not that disruptive in the school environment. Therefore it is necessary to look at all the facts here on limiting online speech.…

    • 501 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics