While the term liberal education is heard from the most prestigious university to an inner city community college, the phrase itself has a hazy definition at best. While educators across America struggle with the definition of the phrase, William Cronon uses purpose, structure, and appeals in his essay "Only Connect: The Goals of Liberal education," to define a liberally educated being and the characteristics that such an education should impart. Cronon capitalizes on inductive structuring to lead the reader along, gently building each new statement upon a foundation of previous ideas. This effectively leads the reader to a strange and new concept that a liberal education should nurture the human mind and inspire students to have love for their fellow humanity.…
To start off, we need to define what a liberal arts education actually is. A liberal arts education is often known as general education, or gen. eds., in college. It is all the classes that a majority…
Combining the educational system will also allow students to become a well-rounded person; also, with the change in time, the students will not have to go back to school to acquire other skills. Bok states that the “vocational majors have an easier time than liberal arts graduates in finding an initial job in business and tend to advance faster and earn more money during their first 10 years of work” (38). However, he then argues that “after 10 years the pictures become more complicated” (Bok 40). He also states that “liberal art teachers do a better job in fostering skills such as communication skills, human relations, creativity, and “big-picture thinking” matter more” (Bok 40). In a world where students are more career oriented, no one can say that liberal education is not important because as Bok states, “companies seem destined to witness faster changes, more frequent career shifts, increasingly diverse workforces, and expanding global operations, all of which favor a broad liberal arts education” (40). This is an explanation that with time, technology is getting more advanced and both the vocational school skill as well as the liberal art skills are needed for students to become a more rounded…
“The New Liberal Arts” is an article written by Sanford J. Ungar, who is a president of Goucher College in Baltimore, Maryland. In the beginning of his article, Ungar wrote, “Hard economic times inevitably bring scrutiny of all accepted ideals and institutions, and this time around the liberal arts education has been especially hard hit.” In other words, Ungar means that recent economic recessions have made a huge impact on what people think of going for a liberal arts degree. In his essay, Ungar lists seven misperceptions and how he reacts to them. The most common misperception that Ungar identified is that liberal arts degrees are no longer affordable. The cost for liberal arts education is very expensive while most families are struggling with the economic is going down. Thus, the second misperception is, with a liberal arts degree, it is hard for graduates to find a good job. Moreover, liberal arts degree seems to be irrelevant and unimportant especially for low income families and first-generation college students. Other misperceptions pointed out by Ungar are: the STEM (science, technology, engineer, math) are what people need to learn right now instead of arts, American education system is too old-fashioned to stick with liberal arts education, and while the cost for liberal arts education is very high, the outcome of appears to show no gain in productivity for the ways graduates do their work. Finally, Ungar states that one of the misperception is because the United States is being led by a liberal Democrat, who seems to bring more problems to the country than solving the existing problems, so it is better for the young adolescence not to follow that same road. Among Ungar’s entire list of misperceptions, I found several of them are strongly disagreeable because he is a president of a liberal arts college, so it’s undeniable that he holds biases, and personally, I think whether to go for a liberal arts degree is mainly an individual…
It may seem like a Liberal Arts degree is for someone who can understand the depth of it, but that is completely untrue. The flexibility It may seem like a Liberal Arts degree is for someone who can understand the depth of it, but that is completely untrue. The flexibility and use of a Liberal Arts degree is for everyone who is interested and is worth more than the loud politicians that wave them about so eagerly to raise their credibility which is why Sanford J. Ungar, former president of Goucher College, wrote The New Liberal Arts.…
Students who realize they want to attend a post secondary school are offered two and four year degrees. Four-year degrees have become standard for people who have the will power and resources to achieve the diploma at the end, but not many people are willing to finish through. “…In 1995, only 58 percent had gotten their B.A. five academic years later. Another 14 percent were still enrolled,” so now their four-year plan has now ended up being five years, six years, and eventually a degree for some. Finding a job that absolutely requires a Bachelors Degree is rare these days. So obtaining this extra two-year degree may be a waste of time and money for most students. Not everyone wants to be a lawyer or doctor anyways, there are some people that want “to become a good hotel manager, software designer, accountant, hospital…
It seems that in this day and age the college curriculum does not only put emphasis on the giving and receiving of facts and information, but is inevitably being pushed in the direction of student entertainment. Subjects such as literature, philosophy, and history are not as popular as they once were, and are in danger of becoming extinct in the academic world. Mark Edmundson's essay, "The Uses of a Liberal Education", provides many interesting and valid points on why the liberal arts field is becoming devalued in the education system.…
Charles Murray emphasizes in his essay “Are Too Many People Going To College?” that while the number of bachelor’s degree graduates increases, the opportunities for them suffer from the opposite effect. People have conceived the idea that higher education is a requirement to be a successful person. Consequently, students are being forced to pursue a degree to please society’s, but not personal, expectations. Murray makes various points, where I completely agree, of why too many people are going to college. Murray states, “[i]t would be nice if everyone could acquire a fully formed liberal education, but they cannot” (226). Liberal art education teaches you not only how to make a living but also how to be a better human being. However; many students are simply not…
Liberal Education’s main purpose in not only to train someone for a specific position, but also to create or develop skills that can be utilized in any profession. However, I believe that the liberal arts are under pressure and in danger in today’s society. The threat that is overwhelming Liberal Education is cuts in programs and funding in private and public schools.…
“On the Uses of a Liberal Education,” was published in 1997 by Mark Edmundson. This author has published many scholarly articles on literacy and cultural criticism. He teaches English at the University of Virginia. This article explains how Universities and those who attend universities including the teachers have focus less on the education portion and focus more on a consumerist society. He explains that the students have become like customers and the teachers are willing to do anything that meets their needs.…
According to the article by David Foster Wallace, “In His Own Words” the “most obvious important realities are often the ones that are hardest to see and talk about.” Wallace argues that a liberal arts education gives you human value instead of just materialistic reward; therefore it not only fills you up with knowledge but “teaches you how to think”. Not the actual capacity to think, but your ability to make choices of what to think about.…
In his article “The New Liberal Arts” Sanford J Ungar, President of Goucher College advocates a radical clarification of several misconceptions about the liberal arts degree. He believes that these issues are the main reasons for the decline in liberal arts education today. He insists that a liberal arts education is still a valuable degree in modern society.…
A liberal arts education built into a STEM education is often thought of as wasteful. Some students prefer a strict STEM education because that would be cheaper and a more direct path to a career—I…
I think it’s the type of person who has a general passion for learning. Not just one thing but a plethora of things. In Mark Jackson’s, “The Liberal Arts: A Practical View”, he stated “a liberal arts education is valuable to students because it helps to develop their analytical-thinking skills and writing skills” and “thinking skills that are critical for success” (YAH p. 207,208). If this the mission of a liberal education, why doesn’t everyone want this? In Earnest Boyer’s “Specialization: The Enriched Major” he expressed that “general education is an irritating interruption – and annoying detour on their way to their degree” (YAH p 217). If anyone thought that general education was an annoyance, why not skip it all and go for the money…
. With the Program in Liberal Medical Education, one must take full advantage of the opportunity to complete a liberal education. As such, there are many courses I would take that revolve around my scientific and medical interests, as well as liberal arts courses to develop my intellectual and creative capacity. I am fascinated by the complexities and fragilities of the human body, and at how one change in a gene or a lack of a hormone can cause potentially fatal effects. Therefore, I could take Introductory Biochemistry, Biophysical and Bioinorganic Chemistry, Introduction to Neurogenetics, Molecular Genetics, Biology of Emerging Microbial Diseases, and Endocrinology to explore these interests.…