Preview

Letter to the Editor

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
449 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor

by Feross Aboukhadijeh, 11th grade

Dear Editor:

I would personally like to thank Jeremy Rifkin for his earth-shaking findings published in “A Change of Heart about Animals”. Without Rifkin’s article, I never would have realized that animals can experience pain, suffering, and affection (2). The global community is truly indebted to Rifkin for proving, for the first time ever, that animals are actually living, breathing creatures—a truly groundbreaking scientific achievement, no doubt. The truth is: Rifkin has proven nothing new and merely demonstrated the barefaced hypocrisy of the animal rights movement.

The “discovery” that animals can experience simple emotions like pain and fear does not justify the adoption of laws protecting animals from lab experiments or human consumption (16). Would a starving lion restrain itself before savagely slaughtering an innocent child for food? Why should humans treat animals any more humanitarianly than they treat us? Since the beginning of time, animals have killed and consumed other animals as part of the natural course of nature. If, as Rifkin argues, humans and animals should be equal, then humans should have as equal a right to participate in the “survival of the fittest” game as any animal does (17). To pass a law restricting the human consumption of animals would damn the human race to extinction. Rifkin’s bigotry and hypocrisy doesn’t stop here.

Rifkin’s arguments against animal experimentation are supported by scientific studies conducted through the very same animal experimentation! From the laboratory crows (7) to the freak-show gorilla (8), to the imprisoned orangutan (10), Rifkin seems to support animal abuse only when he benefits from it. The same can be said about animal rights activists in general.

Ingrid Newkirk, the President of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), once told Vogue magazine: “Even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS,



Cited: CCF. "Consumer Group’s Ad Targets Arizona Animal-Rights Hypocrites." The Center for Consumer Freedom. 05 Oct 2006. CCF. 2 Feb 2007 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the article “Animal Testing Is Cruel and Immoral Regardless of the Benefits Associated With It,” by George Wright and Steve Hoagland, the authors, argue that the use of animals for medical experiments is an immoral practice. The authors describe why people do not ask if the human species is more deserving of under going medical experiments than the animals. Also, in the article by Peter Singer, he said that if we share with them a capacity to suffer, this means that animals like people have interests. Like racism or sexists who believe that those who belong to their race or sex are superior, we are doing the same to the animals. But, there is no difference because animals also can feel. Why can only animals suffer? Wright and Hoagland demonstrate, that the human take advantage to govern the animals like capturing them and holding them in tiny cages. The authors give examples, about the last incident in 1983 at the University of Pennsylvania in which 150 baboons suffered brain damage. No doubt, there are a lot of cruelty of animals, but not just for the the…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals contain traits that humans acquire into their everyday lives, yet humans find different approaches to make these animals suffer on a day to day basis. Tom Regan, author of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs, describes various situations in which humans hunt animals for pleasure while Stephen Rose, author of Proud to be a Speciesist, illustrates why a speciesist like himself would use animals for research. Tom Regan’s describes his main point as to why humans would want to slaughter such precious animals to have them for resources. On the opposing side of the argument, Stephen Rose’s argument states that animal cruelty cannot be considered wrong because “Many human diseases and disorders are found in other mammals…” (Rose 553). Although Regan…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine being confined to a cold cage, no bigger than you, without family, or friends, watching, as one by one, your compatriots leaving, but never come back, waiting silently for your turn. Good morning audience of the Federal Youth Parliament, this is what many animals endure before their final moments, tortured, hurt, and isolated. Animal experimenting is a national system of sadistic torture, vivisection, and genocide, which has been carried out for generations under the disguise of “medical research” and definitely must be stopped. The three main reasons for banning this grotesque science are: present experimentation is currently not species specific therefore results are inaccurate, killing for beauty is not worth it, and animals are more useful alive.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary/Description: This book is about scientists and moral philosophers who are trying to mount a convincing defense against animal rights. The authors actually talk about how animal experimentation functions in the laboratory, the vital role that it plays and eradicating human and animal diseases, and the moral justification for sacrificing animals for the betterment of human life.…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps things can be made clearer if the tables should turn. Perhaps if it should ever occur that animals become masters of this planet, and we human beings become “slaves”—the scientific research targets that we would develop both sympathy and empathy towards animals. It is said that the…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Animal Legal Defense Fund." Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Detroit: Gale, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Sun. 6 Nov. 2016.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal research will always be a very controversial subject in the veterinary field and also in the general public. Most people that are against it are just uneducated about all of the aspects of animal research and the high importance of it. The most significant threat against animal research is the organization called PETA. Yet, the president of PETA is an insulin dependent diabetic. I am sure the president of PETA is ignorant to the fact that without animal research, there wouldn’t be insulin for her to use. As a veterinary technician myself, research on animals seems to be…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal rights are a common altercation when looked at from a medical standpoint and from an equality view. Two authors construct essays discussing the opposing views of animal rights. The first author, Cohen, approaches the need of animal rights from a medical standpoint, while Regan addresses the morality of zoos and the equality of animals. Regan and Cohen differentiate animal rights by addressing the value and equality of animals in regards to animals testing and animal captivity. In this essay, Cohen and Regan’s arguments will both be addressed along with differences and similarities between the two arguments.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Carlton, Danny. "Quotes From The Animal Rights Movement." Right Wing News. 2009. Web. 09 May 2010. <http://www.rightwingnews.com/quotes/animal.php>.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Orlans, F. Barbara. In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. New York: Oxford UP, 1993.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All Animals Are Equal

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In our world, protests occur each day on the issues of animal cruelty and human rights, but when the issues are put together which will reign over the other? The author Peter Singer of “All Animals are Equal” and “Tools for Research” presents his argument for determining when animal experiments are justified. The author starts his paper with a counter argument, questioning if one would be willing to let thousands of people die if those people could be saved by experimentation on a single animal. The answer is a unanimous no; in our culture we value human life over everything else. The author follows by asking the reader if they would be prepared to carry out their experiments on humans who are mentally retarded or orphaned babies, if that were the only way to save thousands of lives? To Singer, if one is unprepared to experiment on humans then they have revealed a form of discrimination on the basis of species, known as speciesism.…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal research is for many a controversial subject. This is because while we do make significant progress by using animals as test subjects, animals still have rights. There comes a point when we have to ask ourselves when do our moral obligations outweigh the rewards. Where do we draw the line?…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some misconception’s regarding the use of animals in research are that animals are constantly harmed. However, research’s have the duty and obligation to minimize the suffering of animals in their institutions. Through laws and observations, researchers have the duty to treat animals humanely (Why do some people say animal research is wrong?)…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cjramirez

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever looked at your pet dog, cat, hamster, or monkey and pondered the thought of it being used as a lab animal? According to AWA reports approximately 1,136,567 animals are used per year for lab testing. And this “testing” is not pretty. Animal cruelty is one of the most controversial subjects when it comes to differentiating views. Nevertheless, when illogical points are made, such as those in the argument discussed a counter argument is quick to put together. The obvious hypocrisy, fallacious correlation, and exaggerative style of the argument made by the author (who is unknown) are all a recipe to an unreliable argument. Animal cruelty is not the only answer to finding cures to diseases, cures that cannot guarantee the same results.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics:Animal Testing

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Scientific research has for long relied on non-human animals like mice, non-human primates, frogs, rats, birds and fish among others for the purposes of being the study subjects or testing products made by scientists (Sun, 2012). As a result, there has arisen a catastrophic massacre of animals in laboratories, some of which face painful and agonizing death. According to Hajar (2011), an approximately fifty to one hundred million vertebrates are used and killed in experiments annually across the globe, a realization that makes humans seem like an extermination species engaging in an all time holocaust on animals. Sprouting from the basic principle of humane treatment of all animals, the mistreatment of animals in laboratories and other test studies has raised many ethical concerns (Engster, 2006). Moreover, the massive killing akin to a holocaust has raised ethical questions on the…

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays