Legalizing Recreational Drugs
Will Not Reduce Crime or Improve The Economy
According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 8.7 percent of Americans ages 12 and older, 22.5 million people, are currently using illicit drugs. These illicit drugs include marijuana, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, and prescription type therapeutics used non-medically (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2011). Would legalizing and monitoring these drugs reduce crime and improve the economy? The answer is no.
Some may argue that legalizing drugs could raise tax revenues, reduce government costs, and reduce crime. A study for the Cato Institute, conducted by Miron and Wadlock, shows that “legalizing drugs would save the government approximately $41.3 billion annually on expenditures related to the enforcement of prohibition” (Ghosh, 2010). This is assuming that drugs will be taxed at the same rate as alcohol and tobacco products. According to Miron and Wadlock, legalizing drugs would eliminate drug arrests, allowing police to chase after “more dangerous and violent criminals” (Ghosh, 2010). However, take a look at all the problems caused by alcohol and prescription drug abuse. Legalizing other mind-altering substances would more than likely cause an outburst of dangerous and violent crimes being committed by users. Therefore, legalizing drugs would be a counterintuitive measure.
It is no secret that drugs have adverse effects on societies. Drug use has been known to lead to an array of social problems such as homelessness, abuse, overdose, and fatal accidents to name a few. Legalization would not only make these problems worse, but it would also lead to more problems enforcing the illegal sale of drugs. Drug dealers would not stop making and selling drugs just because they were made legal, if anything it would give them an even bigger opportunity to make money because more and more people would be using.
Another reason why drugs...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document