Preview

Legal Studies- Courts Role in the Criminal Justice System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Studies- Courts Role in the Criminal Justice System
Describe the role of courts in the criminal justice process:

The main role of the courts is to interpret and apply the law. In terms of a criminal justice process the court serves as the place in which a trial is heard and a sentence decided.

Evaluate the use of the adversary system as a means of achieving justice:

The adversarial system is moderately effective in achieving just outcomes for the individual and society as well as attempting to protect their rights.
One of the main features that ensure the protection and just outcomes for all people is the consistency of the adversarial system. This means that each case will have the same features with the examination of evidence and witnesses as well as the ability for the opposing side to cross examine the witness. As well as the consistency of this, the adversary system allows for people to have greater access to the law. This is especially the case as the burden of proof lays with the accuser not the accused. Hence they have a greater chance of the case being found to have an innocent person hence staying with the rights of the individual to be innocent until proven guilty.
On the other hand many believe that the system results in a case that is won by the best side and not the one with the ‘correct’ evidence. This in turn reduces the ability for just outcomes for all of society as they are unable to win cases in which they are actually innocent or people are not punished when they are actually guilty. This reduces the access to society and means that their rights will not be protected because they are unable to use the system to their advantage in order to achieve the outcomes that are desired and socially correct.
Overall this demonstrates that the adversarial system is moderately effective in being able to achieve justices and protect the rights of the society and individuals.

Examine the role of legal representation in the criminal trial:

The role of legal representation is the stand up on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court system was formed to separate the innocent from the guilty when a disparity has surfaced or developed. In the criminal justice system everyone is entitled to a fair and unbiased trial. We will be identifying and describing the distinguishing features of the major court system ranging from state level, superior court and federal district court through the U.S. Supreme Court. Second we will discuss the key players, jurisdiction rules, and interpretation on issues and the effect of evolving technologies on the court proceeding at all levels in the court system.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The role of the courts: Courts have certain jurisdiction over certain areas of the law. There are several levels of court in NSW which are set out in hierarchical order. The NSW Courts are as…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of the court is to determine whether or not a crime has been committed and impose a sentence where appropriate. In the first instance the alleged offender will appear in the magistrates court where it will be decided whether or not to grant bail or remand in custody…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Purposes of the courts include: Incapacitation which means to deprive of ability, qualification or strength, punishment to subject to pain, loss, confinement, death etc, as a penalty for some offense, transgression or fault. Another purpose is rehabilitation; this is to restore a condition of good health and ability to work. Then there is general deterrence which is to make an effort to prevent people in general from part taking in crime by punishing specific individuals and making examples of them. Lastly, to prevent citizens/ residents against arbitrary government action.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone thinks they have it exactly right on TV shows like Law and Order or CSI. Someone commits a crime, is charged and found guilty all in an hour or two. For many crimes this is not the case, the offender may never be found, or someone maybe falsely convicted. It all hinges on a set of people. The judge, the defense attorney and the prosecutor. All of which are not perfect like the US Judicial System, and justice is not always served. Individual rights are violated due to prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance by criminal defense counsel, and judicial misconduct. In some instances, the guilty…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to personal privacy, everyone in my opinion needs to have it in some way. In the article "Private license plate scanners," RT, a media funded by the Russian government, mentions that license plate scanners should be limited conversely, the publication. In These Times, a progress activism journal out of Chicago, persuades that in their article “Who has the Right to Track you” that Plate Scanners are a use of the 1st amendment. These alternative viewpoints are presented quite differently, however they're are both good and bad. Both of these articles are good examples of rhetorical appeals, style, word choice, and the tone are very good.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are important people in the adversarial system used through the United States. The defense counsel referred to as the defense attorney, renders services on behalf of the indicted and exhibits legal defense for the client, and search for legal justification when appropriate. The other half of the defense counsel is the prosecutor. Prosecuting attorneys is an agent for the public, preferably not individualized people, and in extent is accountable for providing and introducing the state case facing defendants in criminal and civil court (Meyer & Grant, 2003). The function of the prosecutor basically rotates around ensuring that guilt does not go unpunished, the task of the defense attorney surrounds the need to ensure that the legally innocent are not found guilty and that the authority of the state has an adversarial counterpart to make sure some level of honesty is represented for individuals.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the use of a judge to listen to both sides of the trial, to the impartial jury that is used to decide the verdict of the trial. Everyone in the courtroom is there to offer a fair, and safe trial for whomever may have charges brought against them. It may be true that there are many things within the Criminal Justice system that may not work efficiently or even effectively, however there is nothing that is perfect. There is something to be said when it comes to the American Justice system; it gets many things right when it comes to equal rights and fairness for the American…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unlicensed prizefights and similar activities of a sporting nature where the players consent and the audience actively approves of what they see.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    juries

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juries are a panel of citizens selected randomly from the electoral role to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, thus are a fundamental part of how the adversarial system functions. The right to a trial by jury is enshrined by the right to a fair trial. Juries enable a fair trial as they are members of the community who are making an impartial judgement based on what the two opposing sides presents to them, hence they are less prone to bias and bigoted views enabling them to improve access to justice. When a verdict is made, it is often made unanimously so there should be no doubt on the jurors mine as to whether the accused is guilty or not. There are some circumstances, when a majority verdict takes place 11 against 1 or 10 against 1, but only if deliberation has surpassed a reasonable time ( usually 8 hours ), so this allows for a fairer system. Being such a fundamental part of the adversarial system, if a jury is unable to make a verdict, it becomes a hung jury in which the case is dismissed and a retrial is ordered therefore ensuring that there is an equal opportunity for each party to present their side of the case and know that an impartial judgement will be made. Overall, since the right to a fair trial is significant in the adversary system, the juries are a pivotal reason as to how natural justice is achieved.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies

    • 3308 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The fact that our legal system is adversarial is a major contributor. Because the nature of our legal system is competitive and confrontational, it is designed to determine where laws have been broken so punishment can be dealt out. The legal teams employed are also seeking for winning cases, gaining reputations and are willing to project selective facts of a case only in order to win. Therefore, our system is not designed to seek the truth and equality is not achieved for the individual (offender).…

    • 3308 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are two essential elements of the U.S. Judicial System. The most basic part of the system is the adversarial system of justice. This is where the litigants present their cases before a neutral party. Litigants pay their own lawyer fees in addition a fee for filing a civil case in federal court. Many rules exist regarding how evidence and testimony are presented, trial procedure, courtroom behavior and etiquette and how evidence and testimony are presented. For federal courts, the rules are determined by committees composed of judges, professors and lawyers appointed by the chief Justice of the United States. The rules are approved by the…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Conviction

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imagine a completely innocent individual being convicted for a crime he or she had no involvement in but being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The individual lives out his or her jail sentence in an orderly fashion only to be found not guilty after more than a decade with the discovery of vital evidence produced by advanced technology. This is just one of countless cases of wrongful conviction of innocent people by the justice system. Since 1989, countless of cases were found wrongfully convicted after the case had been closed, but were reopened thanks to the advancement in the justice system such as the usage of DNA testing. Problem is, if this is the state of our justice system at the moment, where there is such a large chance of someone being wrongfully accused and having to serve in prison for so many years and only to be released after the damage has already been done, one would always fear that type of justice system. The innocent should fear the justice system no matter how…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is no justice in court. Decisions in court are made by judge and even though he's supposed to be impartial he's just human and he makes mistakes too. As shown in Devil's Advocate the outcome of a case often depends on lawyer's ability to influence the judge and juries. Lawyers try to persuade people to believe that a criminal is not guilty, although they know he is. Leopold and Loeb case is a good example of that. Clarence Darrow took a case of two teenagers that kidnapped and killed a boy because they wanted to know how it feels to commit the ultimate crime. Sometimes lawyers are a good thing, when accused person is innocent. Somebody not guilty can go to prison because others lied. Perfect example of that are the Salem trials showed in The Crucible. Innocent women go to prison or even die just because some girls said they are witches. Court is ruled by people and as long as people don't want to go, or want others to go to prison there will be no justice in courts.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics