There is an African proverb that goes like this “it is not what you call me but what I answer to that matters” some people are satisfied with merely gaining a title, while others are more concerned with achieving results.
.My leadership style has been classified as a “Participative Leadership” (5) which is described as one who accepts input from one or more group members when making decisions and solving problems, but the leader retains the final say when choices are made. Group members tend to be encouraged and motivated by this style of leadership. This style of leadership often leads to more effective and accurate decisions, since no leader can be an expert in all areas. Input from group members with specialized knowledge and expertise creates a more complete basis for decision-making.
Part of a leader’s responsibility is to manage complex job situations and indifferent type of employee personalities. Some managers believe in intimidation as a way of leading their staff, the short term impact of this type of managerial style may be apparent, but in the long run this type of managerial style could lead to lower morale and impact the productivity and quality of the work being generated. This is an example as to how this style can destroy the harmonious work environment. While negative managers emphasize penalties, they do have a place in a leaders list but it must be used carefully due to it’s negative effect on the human spirit.
Negative leaders act domineering and superior with people. They believe the only way to get things done are through penalties, such as loss of job, days off without pay, reprimand employees in front of others, etc. They believe their authority is increased by frightening everyone into higher levels of productivity. Yet what always happens when this approach is used wrongly is that morale falls; which of course leads to lower productivity Positive leaders use rewards, such as education, independence, etc. to motivate...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document