Preview

Law Relating to Companies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
940 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Relating to Companies
City University of Hong Kong School of Law LW3902 The Law Relating to Companies Mid-Semester Coursework Assignment Semester B, 2012/2013 Instructions to Students: 1. The assignment is worth 50% of the overall mark for this course. The total word limit is 1,500 words, excluding footnotes and bibliography. You must do a word count and indicate the number of words on the cover page. If a paper exceeds the allowable word limit, only the first 1,500 words will be read and marked. 2. Your answers must be double spaced, and typewritten in 12 point, Times New Roman font. Failure to comply with this format will result in a penalty of five (5) marks. 3. Indicate the course code and title, your name, student number, seminar section, and lecturer’s name on the cover page of your assignment. 4. The deadline for submission is Friday 15 March 2013 at 5 pm. Additional instructions on the submission of your coursework assignment will be provided to you on Blackboard / in class. 5. You must strictly adhere to the policy of City University of Hong Kong on plagiarism, which is a serious academic offence. Suspected plagiarism may be subject to disciplinary action. You may discuss your work with others, but you must provide your own answers. In case of doubt as to what amounts to plagiarism, please consult your lecturer. All coursework assignments will be reviewed on Turnitin for plagiarism and originality. 6. Any sources for your answers must be footnoted in the paper. You should cite authority (i.e. cases and/or statutes) to support your legal arguments, and these sources must be acknowledged. 7. Examples of proper citation: Case: Liu Hon Ying v Hua Xin State Enterprise (HK) Ltd [2003] 3 HKLRD 347 Statute: s. 275(1) of the Companies Ordinance (Cap 32) 8. Extension to the deadline for submitting the assignment may be granted only in exceptional circumstances. Prior to obtaining any extension to the deadline, you must first approach your lecturer well in advance with a reason and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Business Law Chapters 1-3

    • 3726 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Fundamental error- you have the right to appeal if there is a mistake, only way you can get an appeal…

    • 3726 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Issue: the issue about company’s constitution and whether the loan contract between ABC bank and Sambal Pty Ltd is invalid.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This assignment related to the company Gemsales Pty Ltd, which is engaged in the business of importing and supplying jewellery as wholesalers to the local market. Andrew, Brian, Elizabeth, Diana and Colin were the directors of the company. The company decided that the market becoming more competitive so they need to expand its business. To achieve their target they obtained 4 million dollar loan from Friendly Bank Ltd. They spent all the money to increase their business. All the directors of the company not attended the meetings of the company. Brian and Andrew only participate in the meetings actively. At this time Brian contact with another retailer of jewellery company, victor who looking for reliable suppliers. But he would not deal Gemsales Pty Ltd because he didn’t like…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Consider comparative advantages and disadvantages of each form of association in the light of facts given.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporation Laws

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (e) By being signed by Mario Galli and his friend Ryan Booker (Ryan does not work for FWPL).…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The 16th edition incorporates a number of significant recent amendments to legislation and case law. These include: Personal Property Securities (Corporations and Other Amendments) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Financial Market Supervision) Act 2010 [...], Corporations Amendment (Corporate Reporting Reform) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Act 2011 [...]. This edition also includes a number of important cases, the most significant of which are Morley v ASIC and ASIC v Healey, dealing with directors' duty of care." -- Back cover.…

    • 41100 Words
    • 141 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company Law

    • 3323 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The information revolution and the advances in technology during the past decades has brought to fore many challenges and issues to both governments and businesses, the age-old crime of espionage or the practice of spying to gather secret information is one the most potential issues facing information-based societies. Although, much has been documented as fact and fiction concerning the traditional foreign agents and spies, in today 's world of multi-national, multi-billion dollar corporations, and industrial espionage is a growing danger. Furthermore, this is aggravated by the fact that many large businesses are physically disseminated which has distributed management and administration, and more job specialization.…

    • 3323 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    company law ans

    • 4063 Words
    • 13 Pages

    NOTE: USE THESE SAMPLE ANSWERS AS A REFERENCE ONLY! THESE ANSWERS WILL NOT HELP YOU PASS YOUR EXAM!…

    • 4063 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Company Law

    • 3902 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Mr. Jarvis was a solicitor for Barking Council. He chose to go for Christmas holiday in Switzerland. He got a brochure from Swan Tours Ltd, which for Mörlialp, Giswil said the attractions were,…

    • 3902 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. There was clearly no dissolution. The agreement provided that the partnership may only be terminated “by mutual agreement”. Hence, Morrissey’s unilateral action (resignation) is insufficient to dissolve the partnership: Moss v Elphick. Section 26 of the Partnership Act (“PA”) is applicable only when the partnership was silent on the duration of the partnership. In this instance, the agreement was for the partnership to enure for the joint lives of the parties (unless terminated by mutual agreement). Section 32(1) (c) is also inapplicable since the parties had indicated that the partnership was to be determined by “mutual agreement”, hence subjecting it to a contrary intention. Thus there was no dissolution of the partnership…

    • 4353 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He signed a document that stated if he was not performing well or his performance was unsatisfactory he would be notified and placed on a corrective action plan. This would help him understand what he is doing wrong and how he can improve to keep his job. When Pat was given notice of termination, he was not provided with a reason and was not put on the corrective action plan. This allows Pat to sue NewCorp for not abiding to the contract that was signed by both parties. Pat also has the right to sue for wrongful termination. In this legal case, NewCorp should approach Pat with an alternative dispute resolution. The ADR that should be used for this situation should be an arbitrator or work out a settlement. To avoid these types of liabilities, NewCorp should ensure their performance policies and fire at-will information is stated in their contracts and their employees are aware of the…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Law

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Acknowledgement: These Tutorial Questions were originally devised by Martin Markovic, Senior Lecturer, Business School, University of Adelaide.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (a) The legal issue is can Delusions of Grandeur Ltd increases the dividend rate for preference shareholders from 7 per cent to 10 per cent immediately?…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Companies Ordinance, 1984

    • 164321 Words
    • 658 Pages

    Prohibition of purchase or grant of financial assistance by a company for purchase of its own or its holding company’s shares 71 95A Power of company to purchase its own shares 72…

    • 164321 Words
    • 658 Pages
    Powerful Essays