Law of Contracts
Dr. RAM MANOHAR LOHIYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW.
SESSION 2013-2014
A Project on
" Immunity of agent- a detailed study"
Under the Supervision of
Dr Visalakshi Vegesna
Assistant Professor
Submitted by
Umaima Shahnawaz
B.A.L.L.B(Hons.)
IIIrd Semester
Roll no-147
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my teacher Dr. Visalakshi Vegesna who gave me the golden opportunity to do this wonderful project on the topic " Immunity of agent- a detailed study", which also helped me in doing a lot of Research and I came to know about so many new things. I am really thankful to her. Secondly I would also like to thank my parents and friends who helped me a lot in finishing this project within the limited time.
TABLE OF CASES
Reid v Rigby, (1894) 2 QB 40..........................................................................................................
Weigall S & Co v Runciman & Co. (1916) 85LJKB 187 (CA).......................................................
Ferguson v Um Chand Boid ILR (1906) 33 Cal 343........................................................................
Reckitt v Barnett, Pembrooke & Slater Ltd. 1929 AC 176: 1928 All ER Rep 1(HL)....................
Midland Bank Ltd v Reckitt 1933 AC 1 HL.....................................................................................
United Province Govt v Church Missionary Trust Assn Ltd (1948) 22 Luck 93...........................
Withington v Herring (1829) 5 bing 442..........................................................................................
Sutton v Tatham (1839) 10 Ad & E 27.............................................................................................
Scott & Harton v Godfrey, (1901) 2 KB 726....................................................................................
Foster v Pearson (1835) 1 CM & R
SESSION 2013-2014
A Project on
" Immunity of agent- a detailed study"
Under the Supervision of
Dr Visalakshi Vegesna
Assistant Professor
Submitted by
Umaima Shahnawaz
B.A.L.L.B(Hons.)
IIIrd Semester
Roll no-147
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my teacher Dr. Visalakshi Vegesna who gave me the golden opportunity to do this wonderful project on the topic " Immunity of agent- a detailed study", which also helped me in doing a lot of Research and I came to know about so many new things. I am really thankful to her. Secondly I would also like to thank my parents and friends who helped me a lot in finishing this project within the limited time.
TABLE OF CASES
Reid v Rigby, (1894) 2 QB 40..........................................................................................................
Weigall S & Co v Runciman & Co. (1916) 85LJKB 187 (CA).......................................................
Ferguson v Um Chand Boid ILR (1906) 33 Cal 343........................................................................
Reckitt v Barnett, Pembrooke & Slater Ltd. 1929 AC 176: 1928 All ER Rep 1(HL)....................
Midland Bank Ltd v Reckitt 1933 AC 1 HL.....................................................................................
United Province Govt v Church Missionary Trust Assn Ltd (1948) 22 Luck 93...........................
Withington v Herring (1829) 5 bing 442..........................................................................................
Sutton v Tatham (1839) 10 Ad & E 27.............................................................................................
Scott & Harton v Godfrey, (1901) 2 KB 726....................................................................................
Foster v Pearson (1835) 1 CM & R