Preview

Law Assignment Bungee

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1178 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Assignment Bungee
Business Law 231
Group Tort Assignment

The plaintiff in this case, hereafter referred to as Erin Langworthy, has a cause of action against the following defendants: Victoria Falls Bungee Company and the Bungee Cord Manufacturer (if proven that the manufacturing of the bungee cord was faulty prior to any use). Each will be discussed throughout the report in their respective order, with emphasis on Victoria Falls Bungee Co. The cause of action being pursued against Victoria Falls Bungee Co. is vicarious liability for their employees’ negligence.

The cause of action that the plaintiff is outlining against the Bungee Cord Manufacturer (if investigation finds the manufacturing process added to cause of fault) is negligence and failure to properly inspect and test their products prior to selling and distribution.

The plaintiff’s causes of action against Victoria Falls Bungee Co. are as follows: The defendant can be found to be negligent as they have breached the owed duty of care of properly maintaining all equipment, resulting in the harm of the plaintiff. If the bungee cord was not properly maintained, this would have directly caused the bungee cord to snap and lead to Langworthy's injuries. In addition, professional liability is a cause of action against The Victoria Falls Bungee Co., as the employees should have had the proper training and safety certifications allowing them to inspect the equipment and prevent malfunctions. As well, the company has no proper safety precautions taken in the case someone did fall in the water.

The primary cause of action being pursued by the plaintiff against The Victoria Falls Bungee Co. is vicarious liability as a result of the negligence of their employees. The Victoria Falls Bungee Co. employees were negligent in their actions because they owed a duty of care to ensure customer safety, which they breached, ultimately causing Ms. Langworthy's injuries.

Vicarious liability as a result of employees’ negligence is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff Robert Lopez flied a claim against Adelanto Stadium, Inc. claiming negligence on fault of Defendants insufficient design and/or installation of netting protection from foul balls under California Civil Code of Procedure §1714. Compl. ¶ 3. Also, Defendant’s negligence in failure to warn of dangers of foul balls. Compl ¶ 7. Mr. Lopez alleges that Adelanto Stadium, Inc. is liable on the sole grounds that they own the stadium in which Mr. Lopez suffered said injuries. Adelanto Stadium, Inc. moves to dismiss because Mr. Lopez’s claim fails as a matter of law, since it lacks sufficient factual matter to render a finding of negligence.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kuehn V. Pub Zone Summary

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL, a business patron.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a direct and proximate cause of the negligent acts of Defendant Anheuser-Busch or its employees as set forth above, Plaintiff has incurred the following expenses for medical care and attention:…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smith filed a complaint in trial court claiming that the store was negligent with maintaining safety of their store. She is seeking damages for injuries that she suffered from the fall. The store claims that Smith is just as much at fault as they are and that she was not paying attention to where she was walking because she was too distracted by her child.…

    • 530 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 2 for ACC 440

    • 1728 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Jason, Inc. manufactures chain saws. Margie is injured while using a chain saw manufactured by Jason, Inc. and sues the company for product liability based on negligence. To win, Margie must show that…

    • 1728 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUGusa

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts? Explain your answer.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeal and Hobby Lobby

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Appellee met with an accident in appellant’s store when her feet became entangled in plastic strips. Appellee alleged that appellant was negligent and claimed…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samantha Smith Case

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In our case Samantha Smith had an accident in a retail store where she slipped on shampoo that had leaked from the bottle and suffered a broken hip. In her suite against the store Samantha claims the store is at fault; however, the store claims that Samantha failed to exercise due care while shopping and that she is partially to blame for the accident. The three articles below pertain to our case in one way or another.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to (Melvin, 2011) “Products liability refers to the liability of any seller (including the manufacturer, retailer, and any intermediary seller such as a wholesaler) of a product that, because of a defect, causes harm to a consumer.” (P.226). Sally could argue BUGusa were negligent by not including the insulation needed on the equipment just to save on production costs. However, a more appealing option for Sally to pursue would be a strict liability tort because she doesn’t need to prove the elements of negligence. Sally could argue that BUGusa are strictly liable for her injuries because they placed a product on the market without insulation and she was injured as a…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A “suit” is defined to include a “civil proceeding in which damages because of ‘bodily injury’ . . . to which this insurance applies is alleged.” At present, no suit has been filed against the insured for the losses sustained. Determining whether an insurer has a duty to defend is accomplished by comparing an insured’s policy against allegations made against the insured in a complaint. Under the Section II – Liability part of the policy, a suit is a condition precedent to the insurer’s obligation to either defend or indemnify the insured for liability…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Class V.: Case Study

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (#4-7) According to the case, the plaintiff should not be held as semi liable for his injuries while attending the Daytona International Speedway. My client should receive a decision in his favor because NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway were and are negligent in how races are conducted, the design of the speedway, and the lack of safety barriers to protect spectators, such as my client, from being severely injured during an event. There were several issues that NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway are responsible for that resulted in the traumatic injury my client sustained. According to my client the numerous problems that resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries are:…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cause in fact: Except for the breach of duty by the tortfeasor, would the injured party have suffered damages?…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence and Points

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress, and what tort did the court approve? (5 points)…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Explain the general differences between intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability. Additionally, explain the elements of intentional torts and negligence and provide working examples to illustrate each.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays