Jury Nullification Paper
Anginette Hall, Yadira Marrero, Krissy Clark,
December 24, 2012
Explain Whether Ethnicity Influences Courtroom Proceedings And Judicial Practices
Ethnicity has a major impact on courtroom proceedings and judicial practices from all angles of the criminal justice system. Whether it is from the initial intake to the moment of sentencing, ever participant in the judicial proceeding has a duty to perform their duties to the best of their ability and provide fairness to each and every person that is involved in the proceeding. This is not always the case when the person is racially, ethnically or of a different gender or race. It has been proven through statistical research for the past 20 years that there is still much bias within the court system.
These factors are not only true when dealing with the suspects, but also with personnel. It is still visibly clear that Whites are predominant in the roles of judges nationwide. As a matter of fact, since 1789 the Chief Justice has been White and this fact still remains true since the current Chief Justice is John G. Roberts, Jr. Currently, there is only one black Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas and one Latino Sonia Sotomayor.
There has been progress in the realm of judicial proceedings within the past years thanks to civil right activists, but there is still much bias going on. Sometimes certain occasions of racial bias are not heard of because they are kept quiet and the people are not made aware of through the media or other sources. Where we most see these instances have been in capital crime cases, wherein a minority usually will have a higher risk of receiving than a white person.
Conclude by choosing a position for or against ethnicity-based jury nullification and defend your decision
“Jury nullification, of course, is a time-tested practice that goes back to before the American...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document