Preview

Law 260 Final Paper Fourth Amendment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2519 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law 260 Final Paper Fourth Amendment
Patty Blanchard
Intro to Law
12/4/12
Final Research Paper

George Orwell warned us about this in his novel 1984; He claimed that by 1984, Big Brother would be able to watch our every move, and that day is essentially here. It is nice to know that there are laws and officials out there to protect citizens. They are essential to keeping everyone safe, and making sure criminals face justice, but it raises the question of how far are these officials able to go before they are unreasonably invading people’s privacy? That is generally what the 4th Amendment deals with, protection against unreasonable search and seizure. The current case of Jones vs. United States is a suit dealing with the 4th Amendment and has large implications, as it could set precedent for whether or not GPS tracking can be used without a warrant. A tracking device was put on his Jones car by police officers under the suspicions of intent to distribute cocaine. After 4 weeks of 24-hour surveillance, they were able to make an arrest. I believe that the use of GPS tracking makes for more efficient tracking of criminals and should be permitted by the 4th Amendment, as long as a warrant is issued. As evidenced in various law reviews, and previous 4th Amendment cases, GPS tracking is the newest form of tracking and surveillance, and the law needs to catch up with the technology. The 4th amendment states that people have the right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”(Fourth). In some circumstances only are warrantless searches allowed; situations of searches in highly regulated industries, hazardous operations, and emergency situations. When looking at the case Jones vs. U.S. the main issue is whether placing a GPS device on



References: Barkow, Anthony. "LexisNexis® Academic & Library Solutions." Business Solutions & Software for Legal, Education and Government | LexisNexis. 9 Nov. 2011. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/>. Casey, Timothy. "U.C Davis Law Review." Westlaw. Feb. 2008. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://campus.westlaw.com/result/default.wl? Colb, Sherry F. "NEW YORK V. BURGER, 482 U. S. 691 :: Volume 482 :: 1987." US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://supreme.justia.com/us/482/691/>. "Fourth Amendment Defined & Explained." The 'Lectric Law Library 's Entrance & Welcome. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f081.htm>. Gillham, Omer. "TulsaWorld." NewsRoom, 28 Oct. 2010. Web. 12 Dec. 2011. <http://campus.westlaw.com/result/default>. "KATZ V. UNITED STATES, 389 U. S. 347 :: Volume 389 :: 1967 :: Full Text." US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez. 2004. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/347/case.html>. "KYLLO V. UNITED STATES (99-8508) 533 U.S. 27 (2001) 190 F.3d 1041, reversed and remanded.." Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute. Cornell University, n.d. Web. 4 Dec 2012. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-8508.ZS.html>. Liptak, Adam. "Court Case Asks If ‘Big Brother’ Is Spelled GPS." The New York Times. 10 Sept. 2011. Web. 12 Dec. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/us/11gps.html?_r=1>. "O 'Connor v. Ortega - 480 U.S. 709 (1987)." Justia US Supreme Court System. Justia Company. Web. 4 Dec 2012. <http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/480/709/>. "United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. United States V. Garcia ." FindLaw. Find Law a Thomson Reuters, n.d. Web. 4 Dec 2012. <http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1046181.html>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from sblog.s3.amaxonaws.com Academic database < http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/11-9307-Henderson-v.-U.S.-Petition.pdf>…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. This first case I chose was Beard v. Hamilton, 512 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 4th Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Citation Quiz

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | The title of the case is Katz v. Greene. It is found in the Federal Reporter, 2d series. The volume is 562, and the page is 1285. It was decided in 1981 in the 4th federal circuit. RESPONSE:…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    United States Court Of Appeals 19890531 Mdecgateway.orgUnited States Court Of Appeals (1989, May 31). Mdecgateway.org. Retrieved October 7, 2011, from http://www.mdecgateway.org…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justia Company. (2011). 961 F.2d 260: United States of America v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.,…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Paper

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The First Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is our rights as citizens living in the United States of America. In this paper I will look at three provisions to the First Amendment, highlighting one case for each provision. Included are one case to discuss freedom of speech, one case to discuss separation of church and state and one case to discuss freedom of association.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Bannai, Lorraine K. “Ex Parte Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944).” Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States. Ed. David S. Tanenhaus. Vol. 2. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. 152-155. U.S. History In Context. Web. 2 Apr. 2013.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Josey, S. A. (2011). Along for the Ride: GPS and the Fourth Amendment. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 14(1), 161-186.…

    • 15385 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    FindLaw. (June 17, 1976 Decided). U.S. Supreme Court, KLEPPE v. NEW MEXICO, 426 U.S. 529 (1976). Retrieved from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin-getcase.pl?court=us&vol=426&invol=529…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The history of the case (Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision?)…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The government issued a warrant to place a Global Positioning System on the personal vehicle of Jones to track any unlawful behavior. For 28 days, the government monitored the vehicle and “it subsequently secured an indictment of Jones and others on drug trafficking conspiracy charges” ("United states v.," 2012). The issue is that a violation of the Fourth Amendment may be in question. The question in this case is whether or not the vehicle that was fitted with the GPS is considered real or personal property. Also how is the vehicle subject to government surveillance only on public property? Could the vehicle be subject to the real or personal property laws protected under the Fourth Amendment? The question remains if the vehicle can be searched using the GPS only part of the time. The court’s ruling still does not clearly define what the fourth amendment covers as real or personal property. The definition of the Fourth Amendment is not completely clear on exactly what the real or personal property is defined as or if it is reasonable expectation of privacy as defined by society or a court of law. The law “protects reasonable expectations of privacy, but the Supreme Court has refused to provide a consistent explanation for what makes an expectation of privacy ‘reasonable’” (Kerr, 2007, p. 503).…

    • 1656 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MHM522 Module 3 SLP

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Hall, K. L., Wiecek, W. M., & Finkelman, P. (1991). American legal history: Cases and…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apa Rule in Citation

    • 4234 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). Probst v. Cacoulidis, 295 A.D.2d 331, 743 N.Y.S.2d 509 (2002).…

    • 4234 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays