Preview

Korematsu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1062 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Korematsu
Name: Neriah Rose Burden
Date: 2/3/15
Graded Assignment
Korematsu v. the United States (1944)

Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions.

(2 points)
1. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction?
Answer: He refused to report to a Japanese internment camp in California after Pearl Harbor. He then sued the government claiming discrimination. The case eventually made it to the Supreme Court and is one of the most famous Supreme Court cases.

(2 points)
2. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast?
Answer:

Many people thought that Japanese Americans would become spies, and were potential threats.

(2 points)
3. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation?
Answer:

The court ruled that it was okay in cases of Military Necessity. “Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direct emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” So basically their reasoning was that citizenship has its privileges but also has some responsibilities so when the military was rounding up all the citizens of Japanese descent, they had the duty to obey the responsibility of American Citizenship.

(2 points)
4. What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities?
Answer:
They didn’t do anything; there wasn’t even a vote to see whether or not people agreed with what happened, or if it should happen.

(2 points)
5. The dissenting opinion raises the fact

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I chose the landmark case of Korematsu v. United States for this research paper. Back on December 7, 1941 the Japanese attacked US Naval forces in Pearl Harbor located in Hawaii. The next day the US declared war on Japan and everyone was in a panic wondering what would happen next. The United States joined World War II and all Japanese and Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and put into camps, because the US government was afraid that there could spies or that the people with a Japanese heritage could turn against America. Executive Order 9066 was put into place by President Roosevelt and this order made it possible to put anyone from full Japanese to even 1/16th into special facilities where they were seclude from the general population. Was the Executive Order unconstitutional or not? Fred Korematsu was a native born citizen of the US, but was of Japanese heritage and he was convicted on September 8, 1942 of being in a place where Japanese weren’t allowed. Korematsu then brought forth a petition to take away his conviction due to government misconduct. Eventually, the case reached the Supreme Court and in a 6-3 vote they sided with the government, because they said that the potential spying and espionage was more important than Korematsu’s Constitutional rights. From my research I have concluded that even though Korematsu got his case overturned in 1984 because of untruthful information it was still unfair that it is still deemed Constitutional that there were internment camps for Japanese-Americans. Amendments 1, 4, 5, 8, 13, 14, and 15 of the United States Constitution were all violated and I will explain why in this paper.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive Order 9066

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First and foremost, the 4th amendment prohibits the unreasonable searching or seizing. These american citizens had no reason to be suspected other than their ancestry. The government was hysteria fueled and decided the place them in camps away from the public. They unreasonably displaced and transferred the japanese to these camps and blatantly disregarded their 4th amendment rights in the process.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zinn Chp 10 Questions

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    9. How did judges interpret the law in favor of those businessmen who wished to expand at the expense of others?…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History of Regret

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    After reading Houston’s memoir Farewell to Manzanar, it brings out the treatment of the government of the United States to the Japanese living in the country at the time of world war two were discriminative. In the Executive Order 9066, it is evident that the policies the government was trying to enforce were solely aimed at oppressing the Japanese. The order opened up a gap that would allow the military commanders to make the decisions on who should be evacuated from the military area. This freedom led to the Japanese being evacuated to concentration camps since they were viewed as threats to the United States. Fred Korematsu was charged with defying military orders to evacuate and detained. According to him, he had not committed any crime to warrant him to be charged. More to that, Korematsu was born in the United States and is thus a citizen of the United States. By arresting him, the government had violated his rights as a citizen of the United States. When he tried to defend himself at the Supreme Court, the judgment passed overlooked the provisions in the law for him as a citizen. This is because it had violated the fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendments. The fourth amends requires that everyone be accorded the right to be secure with everything that belongs to them. It is provided that they shall not be subjected to unreasonable investigation, detention and also any violations of whatsoever nature unless with conclusive evidence. The Fifth Amendment provides for a person’s freedom in the United States to be respected and if it is to be withdrawn then there has to be a legal process to do as such. The fourteenth amendment states that any an individual who is a United States citizen either through birth or by naturalization remains to be a citizen. The government thus is not in a capacity to authorize any laws that will deprive any citizens of their rights or invulnerability as citizens of…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A redundant act of tyranny was breached upon the rights Japanese Americans based upon Executive Order 9066. This act caused the relocation of about 110,000 people with Japanese ancestry. Approximately 60% of the people that were relocated were U.S citizens with Japanese ancestry. The people that were interned would be told that they were in these camps for their own protection. Then again we must keep in mind that this action occurred because the United States felt like there was spies among us. When Executive order 9066 was signed by Franklin D. Roosevelt all Japanese American were forced to evacuate all throughout the west coast. Another thing to take into consideration is that in Hawaii no actions such as Executive Order 9066 was taken, and one third of Hawaii's population was Japanese Americans at the time. Basically all that the Executive Order 9066 did was take away innocent people's houses, businesses, and strip them of their basic rights just because of their ancestry.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of the federal government in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights in the period 1865-1992…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IV. What did the Supreme Court decide? Why did the Supreme Court decide as it did?…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Japanese Decries Mass Evacuation; ‘ If They Do That to One Group They Can Do It to Others,’ Citizens’ Official Says.” New York Times, 19 June 1942. New York Times, query.nytimes.com. This New York Times article discussed the stance of Mike M. Masoka, the national secretary of the Japanese-American Citizens in 1942, on the subject of internment. This article was used to show the opinions of Japanese-Americans who were subject to relocation.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Q: What arguments did the southern legislator make against the Supreme Court decision? Did they question its power to make the decision or the content of the decision itself?…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using the textbooks, the University Library, or other resources, answer each of the following questions in 150 to 200 words.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Japanese Internment Camps

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The United States government had no right to intern Japanese Americans because of their ethnic background. People argued that the Japanese aliens in the United States posed as a threat but in reality “more than two-thirds of the Japanese who were interned in the spring of 1942 were citizens of the United States” (Ross). The Nikkei had the same rights as any other American citizen, yet they were still interned. The public skipped to the conclusion that all people of Japanese ancestry were saboteurs which heightened racial prejudices. Furthermore, the accusation of disloyalty among Japanese Americans caused the state department to send Agent Curtis B. Munson to investigate this issue among the Japanese Americans; he concluded “there is no Japanese problem on the west coast…a remarkable, even extraordinary degree of loyalty among this generally suspect ethnic group” (Chronology). Munson’s report stated that there was no military necessity for mass incarceration of these people, yet the government ignored and kept the report…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese Internment

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On February 19th 1942, Roosevelt signed the executive order 9066. Under the terms of the order, people of Japanese descent were placed in internment camps. The United States’ justification for this abominable action was that the Japanese American’s may spy for their Homeland. Over 62% of the Japanese that were held in these camps were American Citizens. The United States’ internment of the Japanese was a poor and cowardly method of ‘keeping the peace.’ The United States was not justified in stowing away Japanese Americans into almost concentration camps. This act goes against the basic Bill Of Rights granted to all American citizens, the Fifth Amendment's command that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, And how under Article 1, section 9 of the constitution ‘the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it.’ The United States revokes the basic rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from the Japanese. The United States also destroys the basic concept of the bill of rights through these internment camps.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Death with Dignity

    • 4342 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Thesis: Is the fear of living an incomplete and possibly painful life a reason to bring your life to an end? Does this fear give us the authority to be masters of our own fate and end our own life before we and the ones we love suffer?…

    • 4342 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Paper

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The First Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is our rights as citizens living in the United States of America. In this paper I will look at three provisions to the First Amendment, highlighting one case for each provision. Included are one case to discuss freedom of speech, one case to discuss separation of church and state and one case to discuss freedom of association.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays