Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

King Lear Essay

Powerful Essays
1200 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Lear Essay
Edmund is a manipulative and deceitful character who contributes to the outcome of

King Lear

Many characters can contribute to the events of a story in several ways. In the play, King Lear, written by William Shakespeare, several situations are presented which leads the audience to conclude that Edmund is a manipulative and deceitful character, whose actions contribute to the outcome of King Lear’s death. Edmunds plans to steal land and legitimacy by manipulating his father, Gloucester, and brother, Edgar, against each another, resulting in the need for Edgar to adopt a role as a crazed beggar. Also, Edmund betrays his father’s trust by revealing, to Cornwall, a letter that makes Gloucester accountable for treason, thus making Edmund promoted to the Earl of Gloucester. Lastly, Edmund promises his love to both Goneril and Reagan, which untimely leads them to their deaths. Through his misleading behaviour and his manipulation of other characters, Edmund has an intense influence on the outcome of many events in the play.

In King Lear, numerous examples are present which reveal Edmund’s determination to steal Edgar’s, Edmund’s half-brother, inheritance from Gloucester. In Edmund tricking Gloucester, making Gloucester believe Edgar is trying to kill him and vice versa. This results in Edgar taking the role of a crazed beggar so he is not caught by Gloucester. One example of Edmund's manipulation, to achieve his goal, is when he fabricates a letter from Edgar asking for Edmund's help in overthrowing Gloucester, their father. When Edmund reveals this letter to Gloucester, he believes it without question, showing the extent to which he has been deceived by Edmund: “O villain, villain! His very opinion in the / letter. Abhorred villain, unnatural, detested, / brutish villain; worse than brutish! Go, Sirrah, seek / him. I’ll apprehend him. Abominable villain! / where is he?” (Shakespeare 1.2.80-84). After knowing of the fictional letter, Gloucester sends men to apprehend Edgar. This is when Edgar takes the role of a crazed beggar because he has now learned his life is in danger. This shows Edmund's manipulation of father against son. Literary critic, Stephen Greenblatt, comments on the displacement of the legitimate by the illegitimate and Edgar’s ensuing struggle to survive in his book Shakespeare and the Exorcists:

The voice of skepticism is assimilated to Cornwall, to Goneril, and above all to Edmund, whose “naturalism” is exposed as the argument of the younger and illegitimate son bent on displacing his legitimate older brother and eventually on destroying his father. The fraudulent position and exorcism are given to the legitimate Edgar, who is forced to such shifts by the nightmarish persecution directed against him. Edgar adopts the role of Poor Tom not out of a corrupt will to deceive, but out of a commendable desire to survive. (Greenblatt 17)

Not only does Greenblatt comment on Edmund’s obsession with displacing his legitimate brother, but also views Edmund’s manipulation of father against son as the cause for Edgar’s adoption of the role of Poor Tom in order to escape his death. Through these examples, it becomes clear that Edgar’s persecution is a direct result of Edmonds manipulative and deceitful actions.

Another example of when Edmund’s manipulation and deceitfulness affect the out-coming events of the play is when, Edmund betrays Gloucester, his illegitimate father. This betrayal comes in the form of divulging Gloucester’s knowledge of a movement to avenge the King to Cornwall, who thinks Gloucester is committing treason. For this betrayal, Cornwall promotes Edmund to Earl of Gloucester. Prior to this, Edmund reveals his devious plot to convince Cornwall of his father’s treachery: “If I find him comforting / King, it will stuff his suspicion more fully. – I will / preserve in my course of loyalty, though the conflict be sore between that and my blood” (Shakespeare 3.5.21-24). Not only does Edmund plan to overthrow his father by revealing his father’s secrets to Cornwall, but he acts as if he has emotion ‘turning in his father,’ showing how far Edmund goes with his deception. Edmund’s betrayal of his father and the resulting implications of his actions are addressed by T.McAlindon, when he says that:

Addressing Cornwall, Edmund refers to his father’s loyalty to the old king as ‘treason’ and his own betrayal of his father as ‘loyalty’; at which point Cornwall gives him his father’s title and invites him to call him ‘father’ instead. (McAlindon 169)

McAlindon comments that by revealing incriminating evidence of his father’s actions to Cornwall, Edmund ensures his own promotion to Earl of Gloucester by Cornwall. Edmund’s betrayal of Gloucester contributes to the outcome of the play because Gloucester is stripped of his rank, and then Edmund is awarded his place. Through the use of this example it becomes clear to the audience that Edmund’s manipulation of Cornwall in order to be promoted has a definite effect on the outcome of the plot.

Edmund’s adulterous relationship with both Goneril and Reagan leads to the death of both sisters. By professing his love to each sister he builds tension and subsequent animosity into their relationship, which eventually leads Goneril to murder Reagan and then commit suicide. This tension is demonstrated to the audience during an aside in which Goneril states that she would rather lose to France than to her sister for Edmund’s hand: “I had rather lose the battle / that sister / Should loosen him and me” (Shakespeare 5.1.17-19). By instilling such fearsome competition in the two sisters, the extent to which they have been manipulated by Edmund becomes quite clear. This deception of Goneril and Reagan by Edmund, eventually leads to the death of the sisters. In his book, Major Literary Characters, Simon Bennett observes that: “Edmund in the final act reveals that he has promised, adulterously, to both Goneril and Reagan. When he learns of their deaths, as he is dying, he puns ‘all three now marry in an instant’” (Bennett 85). Bennett comments on the fact that Edmund has promised his affection to both Goneril and Reagan, contributing to their eventual deaths. Bennett also recognizes Edmund’s deceitful actions in his promise of love to both sisters. Edmund’s manipulation of the two sisters against each other leads to the deaths of both Goneril and Reagan.

Throughout the play there are several examples of how Edmund’s manipulative and deceitful natures contribute to the outcome of the work. Edmund plans to steal land and legitimacy by manipulating both father and son against each other, resulting in the need for Edgar to adopt a role as a crazed beggar. Also, Edmund betrays his father’s trust by divulging incriminating evidence about his activities to Cornwall, resulting in Edmund being promoted to Earl of Gloucester. Lastly, by promising his love to both Goneril and Reagan, Edmund places both sisters on a course that leads to their deaths. Perhaps the story of King Lear may have unfolded differently if Edmund was not such a manipulative and deceitful character.

Works Cited

Bennett, Simon. Major Literary Characters. United States of America: Chelsea House Publishers, 1992

Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespeare and the Exorcists. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987

McAlindon, T. Shakespeare’s Tragic Cosmos. New York: Press Syndicate, 1991

Shakespeare, William. King Lear. New York: Penguin Books Limited, 1998

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many directors argue over the importance of the character of the Fool in the play. Discuss whether or not you feel the Fool is essential to the play or whether or not the character could be removed without damaging the overall impact. Make a reference to the text to support your ideas.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In his end confrontation with Edmund, Edgar tells the announcing herald “Know, my name is lost” (Lear 5.3.122), then upon defeating Edmund, Edgar forgives his brother, and declares “I am no less in blood than thou art […] my name is Edgar, and thy father’s son” (Lear 5.3.167-169).…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To demonstrate the absence of admiration they had for their fathers, the three blatantly disrespected them. Goneril instructs her servants to show contempt towards her father, the King. Oswald, one of Goneril’s servants, refers to Lear as “ My lady’s father”, instead of the King. (1.4.68.). Regan and her husband take another brazen attack on Lear’s dignity. While staying at Gloucester’s castle, Regan and Cornwall, her husband, lock Lear’s personal servant up in the stocks. This is a direct insult to not only Lear, but to Gloucester as well. The couple is definitively showing that the King has no authority over them and that they hold more power in Gloucester’s castle than he does. However, the ultimate disgrace for Gloucester comes when his son, Edmund betrays him. Edmund, no longer in need of his father’s trust, sells out Gloucester to Regan and Cordelia. In return Edmund is heavily rewarded and becomes the new Earl of Gloucester. At this point, for both Gloucester and Lear, all parent-child ties are…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gloucester, much like King Lear, misjudges his children and chooses to side with the one who is least loyal. Before he became part of King Lear 's court, Gloucester was an adulterer and conceived a son, Edmund, out of wedlock. Edmund is so angry about his illegitimate status that he becomes bitter and plots against his brother by making it look as though Edgar tries to kill him and their father. Edmund obviously longs for a higher status in the kingdom because of how people of a higher hierarchy are viewed. The irony of this is that Shakespeare writes this theme into the play as it mimics real life. "Distinctions within the aristocracy and, more importantly, between aristocrats and commoners are enforced, both on stage and in public, through performance" (Spotswood, 265). Edgar is forced to leave the kingdom so that he is not killed. But the division of this family does not stop Edgar from staying loyal to his father. Through the years, he disguises himself so he can keep in touch with his father. "In their disguises, their imaginations, and their degraded condition, they reflect the sufferings of the weakest in their society" (Selden 145). Edgar stays by his fathers…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare the portrayal of Lear at the beginning and the end of the act. What does the transformation of the king at this early point in the play suggest?…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FAMILY - Lear banishes his favourite daughter on account of her response to his question of love, and Gloucester gives his estate to his bastard son, Edmund, because of a forged letter from his favourite son "Edgar". King Lear has a few fits that make people question his sanity, while Gloucester blames the kingdom's troubles on superstitious things like eclipses. Another similarity between the two characters is their blindness of deceit from their children. The two men, in addition, seem to both be old and senile. Like Gloucester, Lear is blind to all the evils of his life and his surroundings until it is far too late. For both Lear and Gloucester, affliction brings insight, more valuable than sight. Gloucester is also deceived by his fraudulent,…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship amid Edgar and Edmund is a vital part to the play. Edmund, Gloucester’s illegitimate son, feels as though he’s had enough. He is constantly considered a joke by his father for example when Gloucester says “...his mother fair, there was good sport at his making, and the whoreson must be acknowledged.” This has led him to become angry and frustrated with his life. During his soliloquy, Edmund says “Lag of a brother? Why…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treachery In King Lear

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Gloucester does not see or refuse to see, is the hatred Edmund has for him because of his cavalier treatment of him. Edmund wants all control of Gloucester's money and power. He fools both Edgar and Gloucester, destroying both their characters, he turns them against each other, causing chaos and destruction in the natural universe. Although Edmund, Regan and Goneril’s main motives are to inherit all their fathers' kingdom, Edmund seems to have a more complicated objective than the Lear sisters. In his soliloquy, he expresses his anger towards society because it has prevented him from inheriting Gloucester's kingdom, and furthermore, the words "bastard" and "base" give the impression that he is worthless: "...the curiosity of nations to deprive me" . For that…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear And Cordelear

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When combining this possibility with Edmund's final scene, in which he tries to save Cordelia and Lear, Edmund clearly shows himself to be of different fabric than Goneril, Regan, and Cornwall. In many ways, Gloucester is responsible for what Edmund becomes. Edmund is as much Gloucester's son as is Edgar. In embracing the man-made laws that reject Edmund's legal rights, Gloucester is denying natural laws that would make Edmund and Edgar equal.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Analysis

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In Act I Scene ii Edmund receives a letter from his brother that mentions if their father was dead Edmund would inherit half of the father’s fortune even though he is a bastard. The father, Gloucester walks into the room while Edmund is rereading his brother’s letter. Edmund doesn’t want his father to read the letter until he knows his brother’s intentions, but Gloucester sees Edmund try to hide the letter and asks his bastard of a son what he is hiding. After Edmund fruitlessly tries to not let his father’s eyes read the letter Gloucester reads the letter and becomes furious. With Gloucester furious at his son Edgar, Edmund can now pit these two together for his own personal gain.…

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear is first presented in the first scene as an egocentric man who is ignorant of the many flaws in his personality. Lear has formed himself a personality and defined himself as an individual and utterly refuses to give up this vision of himself, one can only imagine the figure that Lear must have once been considering the absolute dominance and control that he exerts over the others around him. As is revealed in the first act, Lear is drastically unrealistic about what is to happen to him during and after relinquishing the throne, and as the result of this great misunderstanding he banishes his loving daughter, Cordelia, leaving only his unloving, and eventually evil daughters, Goneril and Regan, to care for him. The fact that Lear requires his daughters to express how they love him in words, and his irrational reaction to Cordelia’s response, shows that King Lear needs to feel that he is loved to remain mentally stable.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the passage, Edmund is seen to warn his brother Edgar to “Forbear Gloucester’s presence” because their father has been offended by Edgar somehow. Edmund is established as a duplicitous character almost immediately because the audience has seen Ed himself manipulate Gloucester. Shakespeare’s use of dramatic irony not only engages the reader but also gives them an insight into Edmund’s true personality. This serves a pantomime style purpose where the audience understands Edmunds ill intentions yet Edgar cannot. Once again the playwright is influencing the audience’s negative feelings towards Edmund and increases sympathy for Edgar due to his helplessness.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Parallel Points

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The emotional effect is heightened in King Lear with Shakespeare’s use of a subplot that mirrors the father-child relationships, the corruption of political power, and the death of the protagonist in the main plot. The subplot of Gloucester, Edmund, and Edgar in King Lear serves three main purposes. The main plot is the betrayal of King Lear by his two elder daughters, to whom he abdicates his power, during the first part of the play. The subplot is the similar story of the betrayal of the Earl of Gloucester by his illegitimate son Edmund. In both cases, the other victim of the conniving children is the one child who was truly faithful to the father: Cordelia in the case of the king Lear and Edgar in the case of Gloucester. Both betrayals occur because the fathers foolishly believe their sinister children who trick them into believing that their good-hearted siblings are the villains.…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gloucester’s rift in his relationship with Edmund began with the simply embarrassing his son by discussing a very sensitive topic, to his son’s birth, stating “There was good sport at his making and the whoreson must be acknowledged” (Act 1). Due to Gloucester’s insensitivity Edmund ultimately goes onto a path of becoming power hungry, going as far by besmirching the good name of his brother, Edgar. This also leads to Gloucester’s demise as he perishes under the alliance of Cornwall and Edmund, as he is punished for entrusting vital as well as traitorous information to Edmund. And for Edmund the is end is evident after his brother learns the truth of his sinister deeds and Edmund is soon no more The relationship between Edmund and Gloucester shows that there was trust built into the relationship between Edmund and Gloucester, however it also shows that it can easily be torn down and the ability of it to be exploited. Trust is a key factor that is needed where family is involved, and when there is no trust there cannot be a stable family.…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lier Relationships

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Secondly, The relationship between Lear and his daughters was not the only dysfunctional one in the tragedy. Edgar and Gloucester’s relationship slowly breaks more or less the same as that of Cordelia and Lears in the beginning of the play. Gloucester feels betrayed by Edgar, although it was Edmund, who is the one planning to kill him and therefore frames Edgar. It is evident that Gloucester and Edgar had a poor relationship to begin with, because as even Edmund pointed out, he is a…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays