Preview

Keystone Xl Pipeline

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Keystone Xl Pipeline
President Obama should reject the Keystone XL pipeline.
Canadian Alberta Oil Sands production is set to double by 2020, and the oil companies must find new markets for this oil. The key enabler to transport all this excess oil into new markets is a company called TransCanada, a Canadian pipeline company. Keystone XL pipeline is a project proposed by TransCanada with 1,179 mile (1,897 km), 36-inch diameter crude oil pipeline beginning in Hardisty, Alberta, Canada and extending south through American Midwest to Steele City, Nebraska, US. The oil sands have nearly 2 trillion barrels of oil in place, but Alberta has limited refineries and is landlocked. The Keystone XL pipeline is expected to transport the excess heavy oil to the refineries in the coast of the Gulf of Mexico into a lighter variety. This benefits Canada because, the lighter variety oil would demand a higher price per barrel, have access to world markets by sea in addition to being available in larger quantities for America’s growing needs. The current Keystone pipelines export a certain amount of oil. Previously unprecedented production of oil is creating an unprecedented bottleneck in Cushing, Oklahoma, which means that there is excess supply and hence, a discount in the selling prices of this oil. Canadian oil companies want to overcome this situation and meet the following goals: get excess oil supply to the market, get best possible price, and limit market risks. They have three options to do this. First, transport the oil to the pacific coast and refine it in Asia. They can use Alberta’s northern gateway pipeline to transport the oil. The key challenges in this scenario are increased tanker traffic and hence increased likelihood of a spill, and environmental challenges because the oil would pass through environmentally sensitive areas. Second, set up refineries in Alberta. The key challenges of this situation are: Alberta has no coastline, which means it would be difficult and expensive to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In general, the level of investment and growth in the oil sands has hurt the province’s conventional oil and gas industry. Rising real estate costs and general inflation have hurt sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing particularly hard. Consequently, today there is a growing income split between those Albertans who are employed in the oil sands…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a pipeline system that holds oil and it runs through the United States and Canada. More specifically, it starts in Alberta, Canada at the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and travels to oil refineries in Texas and Illinois as well as oil tank farms and an oil pipeline distribution center located in Cushing, Oklahoma. The Keystone Pipeline consists of three phases as well as one more operation that was awaiting approval but has been rejected. The first phase is the pipeline bringing the oil from Hardisty, Alberta to a connection in Steele City, Nebraska which then disperses into refineries in Illinois. The second phase is an extension that leads from Steele City to distribution and storage facilities…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to CBS News writer, Bruce Kennedy, “Some critics contend that the pipeline could cause gas prices to rise, especially in the Midwest. That 's because the oil that would be transported is not intended for American consumers. Rather, the Canadian oil currently sent to refineries in Illinois, Ohio and elsewhere in the Midwest would end up being diverted to Keystone, chiefly for export to markets…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The development of the tar sands project against the purpose of harness private interest to serve the public interest. The term “Public” contains two aspects: the public human aspect and the public environment aspect. First of all, the booming economies of the developing countries and the obsessive oil needs of the developed countries have triggered massive oil sand exploitation in countries like Canada. Pipeline transport companies like Keystone and Enbridge captures this opportunity to make financial growth. Instead of harness private interest to serve public interest, these companies embrace their private interest and ignore the public interests. While…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Keystone Xl Pipeline

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A proposed oil pipeline project will have the capacity to transport thounsands of barrels of crude oil to refineries in Oklahoma, Illinois, and the Gulf Coast of Texas. The Keystone XL is a 1,711-mile pipeline delivering Canadian crude oil to United States oil markets. This project is a response to the market demand for heavy crude oil in the Unites States. The pipeline will also be used to transport crude oil to the Cushing tank farm in the Midwest region. Many refineries in the Gulf Coast region provide millions of barrels per day, This region accounts for almost half of U.S. refining capacity. The refineries produce large amounts of refined petroleum product, like gasoline and jet fuel. The negative impacts of the Keystone XL project are too immense to outweigh the need for heavy crude oil in the United States.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Keystone XL pipeline

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First, the Keystone XL pipeline would travel through rivers such as Missouri river, Yellowstone, and Red rivers. Two million of population is depended on these rivers for drinking water. If somehow oil spill into these river, it would be a great disaster because people will be out of water until is completely clean again. Also, there marine life will die because of oil which will affect the business of the marine industry. In short, Keystone Xl pipeline will become expense for government. The expenses would be greater than the taxes gathered by the Keystone Xl pipeline…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Oil pipelines are prone to environmentally devastating spills, and have never proved to be an effective long term solution for the transport of crude oil. A pipeline the size of the Keystone XL would simply be a disaster waiting to happen. The proposed pipeline would stretch over 2,000 miles, and go directly above the Ogalalla Aquifer in the central United States. The Ogalalla aquifer is one of the largest, and most important in the entire United States, “About 27 percent of the irrigated land in the United States overlies this aquifer system, which yields about 30 percent of all ground water used for irrigation in the United States. The aquifer system supplies drinking water to 82 percent of the 2.3 million people (1990 census) who live within the boundaries of the High Plains study area.” (Dennehy) The sheer size of the aquifer makes it so that the Keystone XL would have to go over it in order to reach it 's destination, so what damage a spill would have is only magnified by the agricultural importance of the aquifer. There have been 24 oil pipeline spills in the US alone over the last decade, spilling over 680 thousand tonnes of oil.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These arguments in favor of construction and operation of the pipeline are decreased gas prices, stronger national security through reduced foreign oil import dependence, and creation of jobs. In the United States, oil supplies 36 percent of our energy sources and is all so the principal fuel for transportation around the world. Oil in particular fuels around ninety-four percent of our nation’s transportation sector (Petroleum & Other Liquids, 2013). This makes oil an important commodity to many nations including our own and the market for oil very competitive between nations as they seek to compete over oil exporters and nations with convenient access to oil reap the economic benefits. Therefore, the pricing of crude oil is controlled by multiple factors; supply, demand, markets, accessibility, and physical balancing. Although the United States holds position as a major consumer of oil, our nation solely alone as minute effects on crude oil cost, even for refineries in our own country. According to an academic journal by Edwin Slade titled, The Keystone Pipeline Addition: Assessing the Potential Benefits of Reduced Gasoline Prices and Increased National Security, U.S. refineries’ crude acquisition cost change with geopolitical events, such as increasing oil demands in foreign countries such as China and those in the Middle East. Keystone supporters argue that by making oil transports more available to our country and to the global market, we impact the cost of crude oil in a more effective way that depends heavily on Keystone exports. Benefits of oil availability can be viewed on a local scale primarily in Midwest. Prior to Keystone operation, Canadian oil imports accumulated in Cushing, Oklahoma, since oil refineries and pipelines are centralized in this area, and resulted in an abundance of excess oil known as the Cushing glut. This resulted in increased…

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a system that transports oil from Canada into the U.S. The owner of this Pipeline is TransCanada, who proposed the idea back in October of 2005. However, the construction on the Pipeline didn’t go under way until 2008. It took TransCanada over two years to acquire all the necessary state and federal permits for the pipeline. The pipeline runs for over 2100 miles, through a number of states and provinces throughout the United States and Canada. There is said to be many advantages of having this pipeline; such as an increase in revenue for the U.S. and Canadian economies. It’s supposed to open a countless amount of jobs and is said to have economic and national security advantages. However, many have argued that the pipeline should not exist due to its negative effect on the environment and will reduce our energy security.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, I believe the Keystone XL Pipeline would be a bad investment for America as it will cause negative externalities, displace residents from their homes and property and minimal employment once the construction of the pipelines…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    proposed pipeline would ship fossil fuel from the oil­rich tar sands of Alberta, Canada, to the…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arctic Oil Drilling

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge provides many immediate economic benefits for the United States. Given the current economic struggles that Americans are already facing, jobs have been hard to obtain. With the approval to drill in the Arctic, job opportunities can be created which will decrease the job struggle. Over a million jobs will be created if Arctic drilling is approved to drill and transport the new oil. These new jobs would provide secure employment for Americans who are unemployed. This is a definite beneficial short term advantage of approving the right to drill for oil in the Arctic. In 2007, the United States imported 330 billion barrels, or sixty percent of the United States total oil (“Top Ten”). The biggest domestic source of oil is located in the North Slope oil fields. These oil fields cover nearly 214 thousand acres, and produced 25 billion barrels a day at one point and are operated by BP and Phillips. With a majority of the nation’s oil being imported, it not only needs to be transported, usually by ship, but costs a great deal more for the country as well. Georgia’s Senator, The Honorable Zell Miller, who has continually been fighting for drilling in his…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Government wants to build on Indians reservations. The pipe line would run through a sacred burial ground. Also, it would run under a lake the tribe considers a crucial water source for them. The Dakota Access pipeline is a $3.7 billion project that would carry 470,000 barrels of oil a day from the oil fields of western North Dakota to Illinois, where it would be linked with other pipelines. The plaintiffs claim the tribe was not properly consulted before the US Army Corps of Engineers approved the pipeline project.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people would most likely feel conflicted if a very large pipeline was being built through their back yard. Some would even take action. In the article, “Native Americans Celebrate pause of North Dakota Pipeline, Vow to Fight on,” the author, Dave Thompson, claims the Native Standing Rock Sioux Tribe feels the same way about their sacred land. However, through growing efforts the Native people of the local region of the pipeline’s construction to discontinue this pipeline they are making progress in halting the continuation of the pipeline. The author provides the readers with mostly fact used to inform the audience of the article…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the pipeline will create a bunch of jobs which will help the people of this country. According to Trans Canada, “It would create 20,000 jobs, 13,000 in construction and 7000 in manufacturing. According to Barak Obama, it will only be around 2000 jobs to build and those jobs will only last one to two years. In reality, according to the wall street journal, the Keystone XL pipeline is estimated to cost 5.4 billion dollars to build. Is that really worth the estimated 50-100 jobs to sustain the pipeline after it is built? According to Emer Hughes with heavy.com, the Keystone XL is one way to transport oil, and if it is built, then it will find another way to get distributed. She also says that “transporting by rail is more hazardous than pipelines. While this is true, according to NPR the pipeline will transport 830,000 barrels of oil per day. This oil will boost climate change in a bad way. Some people also think the pipeline will lower gas prices in the southern United States, but According to Jeff Brady, the oil the pipeline is going to carry is more expensive than most oil to produce, which will make it hard for the oil companies to make money off of it. So in reality, gas prices my go up with the pipeline. Almost all things that seem good about the keystone pipeline are not as good as they…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics