The Evolution of Management Accounting Robert S. Kaplan The Accounting Review, Vol. 59, No. 3. (Jul., 1984), pp. 390-418. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0001-4826%28198407%2959%3A3%3C390%3ATEOMA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F The Accounting Review is currently published by American Accounting Association.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/aaasoc.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact email@example.com.
http://www.jstor.org Sun Apr 1 18:02:28 2007
THE ACCOUNTlNG REVlEW Vol. LIX,No. 3 July 1984
The Evolution of Management
Robert S. Kaplan
ABSTRACT: This paper surveys the development of cost accounting and managerial control practices and assesses their relevance to the changing nature of industrial competition in the 1980s. The paper starts with a review of cost accounting developments from 1850 through 1915, including the demands imposed by the origin of the railroad and steel enterprises and the subsequent activity from the scientific management movement. The DuPont Corporation (1903) and the reorganization of General Motors (1920) provided the opportunity for major innovations in the management control of decentralized operations, including the ROI criterion for evaluation of performance and formal budgeting and incentive plans. More recent developments have included discounted cash flow analysis and the application of management science and multiperson decision theory models. The cost accounting and management control procedures developed more than 60 years ago for the mass production of standard products with high direct labor content may no longer be appropriate for the planning and control decisions of contemporary organizations. Also, problems with using profits as the prime criterion for motivating and evaluating short-term performance are becoming apparent. This paper advocates a return to field-based research to discover the innovative practices being introduced by organizations successfully adapting to the new organizationand technology of manufacturing. HE challenges of the competitive environment in the 1980s should cause us to re-examine our traditional cost accounting and management control systems. Virtually all of the practices employed by firms today and explicated in leading cost accounting textbooks had been developed by 1925. Despite considerable change in the nature of organizations and the dimensions of competition during the past 60 years, there has been little innovation in the design and implementation of cost accounting and management control systems. Therefore, it is not only appropriate but necessary that we understand the sources of today's practices, reflect on the new demands for planning and control information, and develop a research strategy to meet these new demands. Section 1 traces the development of
Editor's Note: This paper served as the basis for a plenary address given at the 1983 Annual Meeting of the American Accounting Association. It was subsequently submitted and reviewed for publication.
I greatly appreciated conversations with and articles and references provided by Professor H. Thomas Johnson of the University of Puget...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document