Pre AP English II
27 April 2014
Morals usually are the guiding principles in just about everybody's life. Humans generally tend to do what is considered to be "right" and astray from what is "wrong", but in some cases, people choose to do what is considered "wrong". However, people believe that children should be dealt with much more lightly because they're not adults yet. On the other hand, I disagree that children should be exempt from punishment, and I fully agree with the four justices that believe a child who commits a heinous crime should be punished with a prison sentence of life without parole. The eighth amendment bans cruel and unusual punishment to protect its citizens. If a child commits a murder and goes unpunished, is that not a cruel punishment for the victim's family? In Jennifer Jenkins' "On Punishment and Teen Killers", she states that there is: "no regard to the impact on victims' families"(10). The justice system is not doing its job if it is not getting justice for the victim's family. Therefore it would be unconstitutional for the law to not punish the criminal for their heinous crime. Additionally, there have been researches and studies conducted in order to answer why teenagers act the way they do. Research shows that the brain is the very reason for these children’s actions. In Paul Thompson's article "Startling Finds on Teenage Brains", he claims, "massive loss of brain tissue loss occurs in the teen years" and that it is, "only being lost in the areas controlling impulses, risk-taking, and self-control"(7). This may explain why children act in this horrific manner, but it does not give them an excuse to commit crime. A rebuttal to Thompson's claim of defense would be Marjie Lundstrom’s article "Kids are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes", when it points out: "they're only kids. That is, until they foul up. Until they commit crimes"(4-5). Kids are kids until they choose to make an...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document