Preview

Juries

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juries
After the Norman Conquest in Britain, the concept of jury system were then imported, though in presence function were quite different compare to the early. The jury system is considered important in the English Legal system now, although only a small number of cases were used. It is absolute necessary role to ensuring the criminal justice system works for the advantage of the public rather than advantage of the unjust leader. In the trial process in England and Wales were involved. In the magistrates' courts, magistrates will decide whether the person is guilt or innocence. In the Crown Court, a jury consist of twelve ordinary layperson will determine the verdict.

Jury is function to collect the evidence and make up a mind on what the exact facts of the case are and what the case actually happened. The judges have to do his part by giving the direction to the jury on the related law and summarize the evidence before it is in order to reach the verdict. The judges then will call up the jury to reach a unanimous conclusion. The jury can request to gives a majority verdict which one person disagree or more either 10-2 or 11-1. If they reach a verdict in a reasonable time but could not come up with a unanimous conclusion then majority verdict will be granted. The judges will get an order of the court to discharge a jury if they are not able to arrive a majority decision and the re-trial will be perform.

There are two types of cases uses the jury system that is the civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, the jury is to decide the amount of money to be compensate or awarded from the damages. While in criminal cases, the defendant has a right to a trial by jury. Jury can try a case in Crown Court and if the defendant found not guilty, and the trial continue to proceed, the defendant then will be tried before a jury. Jury is to come up with a verdict to decide guilt or innocence without given a reason then judges will decide the suitable sentence. It is the jury

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ocr Law Unit1 Chapter 5

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    MUST be heard and sentenced at crown. If an indictable offence is plead not guilty then it must be tried by a jury.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Twelve jurors are given the job, by the judge, of deciding whether a teenage boy is innocent or guilty of killing his father. They must separate the facts from the fancy and provide a verdict of guilty if there is no reasonable doubt to the claims, or non-guilty if there is reasonable doubt. The decision must be unanimous. The charge against the defendant is Murder in the first degree – premeditated homicide (death sentence).…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    cja 344

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury nullification is a constitutional doctrine that allows juries to acquit defendants who are technically criminals guilty, but who do not deserve punishment. It occurs in a trial when a jury reaches a verdict contrary to the judge 's instructions as to the law. A jury verdict contrary to the letter of the law does not belong only to the particular case before it. If a pattern of acquittals, however, develops in response to repeated attempts to prosecute a statutory offense, it can have the de facto effect of invalidating the statute. A pattern of jury nullification may indicate public opposition to an unwanted legislative enactment. In the past, it was feared that may unduly influence a judge alone or a panel of public officials to follow established legal practice, even if such practice had drifted from its origins. In most modern Western legal systems, however, often instruct juries only serve as "finders of facts", whose role is to determine the veracity of the evidence, and the weight accorded to evidence, to implement these tests the law and reach a verdict, but not decide what the law is .…

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law greatly reflects moral and ethical standards in relation to the use of juries as juries ensure an accused is judged by their peers and members of the community, however, the selection process in a jury can also result in a jury which does not fully reflect community standards. Under the Jury Act 1977 (NSW), any Australian citizen may be called to serve on a jury, and citizens are randomly selected from the electoral roll. This means that the jury is essentially a representation of the community and its interests, thus, enabling the views and opinions of society to be upheld when deciding a verdict. It also allows an accused to be judged by their peers and fellow citizens, instead of a judge, who may not be in touch with the ethical…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role the jury trial plays in criminal cases is fundamental to the American scheme of justice.1 The right to a jury trial is rooted in our legal tradition2 and is articulated in the U.S. Constitution.3 This protection extends back to British common law, and serves as a check against government oppression by ensuring that a defendant’s fate lies in the hands of a jury of ordinary citizens rather than the government’s prosecutor or judge.4 Coupled with the presumption of innocence, the right to a jury trial serves as a “cornerstone of Anglo-Saxon justice”5 that limits potential government tyranny. At the heart of jury trial protections and the presumption of innocence lies the concern that it is better to let a guilty man go free than to convict an innocent man.6…

    • 8780 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the trial, both the prosecutor and the defense attorney will present evidence and testimony. The jury containing 12 members of society chosen to reach a verdict will listen to and evaluate evidence and testimony to determine an outcome. When the trial takes place, the courtroom is generally open to any citizen wishing to visit. Friends, family and members of the press cannot be barred from a courtroom trial.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    juries

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juries are a panel of citizens selected randomly from the electoral role to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, thus are a fundamental part of how the adversarial system functions. The right to a trial by jury is enshrined by the right to a fair trial. Juries enable a fair trial as they are members of the community who are making an impartial judgement based on what the two opposing sides presents to them, hence they are less prone to bias and bigoted views enabling them to improve access to justice. When a verdict is made, it is often made unanimously so there should be no doubt on the jurors mine as to whether the accused is guilty or not. There are some circumstances, when a majority verdict takes place 11 against 1 or 10 against 1, but only if deliberation has surpassed a reasonable time ( usually 8 hours ), so this allows for a fairer system. Being such a fundamental part of the adversarial system, if a jury is unable to make a verdict, it becomes a hung jury in which the case is dismissed and a retrial is ordered therefore ensuring that there is an equal opportunity for each party to present their side of the case and know that an impartial judgement will be made. Overall, since the right to a fair trial is significant in the adversary system, the juries are a pivotal reason as to how natural justice is achieved.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Trial Discussion

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both the prosecution and defense present evidence and call witnesses, in front of a judge and a twelve-member jury. The jury will examine the evidence and return a verdict. The judge will interpret the verdict for sentencing, according to state law.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trials And Verdicts

    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The constitution is the basis of all criminal law as well as trials and their verdicts. The constitution and the state and federal court systems have been in effect since the nineteenth century. Each and every court case has their own unique processes related to the different courts and how the case made it to any specific one, taking a plea bargain as an alternative to facing trial and what happens to the wrongfully accused will help understand a little more about the ins and outs of trials and verdicts.…

    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both sides of legal dispute have the rights and are entitles under the Constitution to request a jury trial. When judge decides on a case without a jury, it is considered a bench trial. Judge usually takes on two roles and are the “referee” to rule the admissibility of evidence and decides a resolution that can determine credibility based on evidence (Hg Legal Resources, 2017). The advantages to a jury trial is the amount of money that jury award and ruling is based on passion whereas a judge rule based on evidence (Hg Legal Resources, 2017). The disadvantage to a jury trial is selecting a panel and utilizing a licensed attorney during this process (Hg Legal Resources, 2017). Also, finding the right attorney to handle the case is the key to a…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the criminal justice system the individuals are spoken to by two different yet similarly imperative gatherings. These gatherings incorporate the police who research the wrongdoing and the head prosecutors who arraign the wrongdoers. At the point when there is a trial, a specific number of people are called into the witness of the court which are known as the jury. It is not just the right and obligation of juries to judge the realities, additionally what is the law. To at last focus a decision, the jury must look into all data in addition to the ethical goal of the blamed In the lawful equity framework for the United States, there are numerous of benefits , for example, being on the jury.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Selection

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury selection are various methods used to decide who will be on the jury. The jury pool is initially chosen from among the community utilizing a random strategy. Jury records are gathered from voter enlistments and driver permit/state id. From these records, some people are mailed. They will be addressed in court by the judge and/or lawyers in the U.S. According to Shari Seidman, in some cases such as capital punishment, the jury must be death qualified. Jury procedures are taught in law institutions to law students. The jury chose is said to have been empanaled.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On Jury Trial

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    These jurors are usually brought into the court where they are given some basic information about the case such as how long the trial might last. The judge then asks if anyone has reason to be dismissed for cause or hardship - such as taking care of sick family, leaving a business unattended, and other such things. These people are usually dismissed from service but may be called again in the not too distant future.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Selection

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At present (April 2001) only the state of Oregon has a statute permitting doctor-assisted/physician-assisted suicide (DAS/PAS) and then only within very narrowly prescribed circumstances, i.e., for a terminally ill patient. In the November 1998 elections, voters in Michigan defeated a ballot measure to legalize doctor-assisted suicide. Earlier in the last decade, voters in California and Washington state defeated similar ballot measures. A bill similar to Oregon's PAS law died in the Maine Legislature's Judiciary Committee in February 2000 and the issue before Maine voters as a referendum in the November 2000 election was narrowly defeated by some 51% of those voting [yeas 315,031; nays 332,280]. Such measures although often introduced often die within committee hearings and seldom reach the floor of the full legislative body. An example of such proposed legislation is California AB1592 THE DEATH WITH DIGNITY ACT, proposed early in 1999-- presented here in an analysis form. Permissive DAS legislation is overshadowed by measures prohibiting DAS under penalty of law. The Death with Dignity National Center has compiled a summary of current legislative efforts to permit and prohibit doctor assisted suicide.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Selection

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The selection of a jury is the process that occurs right before the actual trial, and after the trial initiation and the arraignment and plea. Only about 10 percent of actual arraignments see an actual trial, because 90 percent of cases that are preparing for trial end up accepting a plea bargain (Schmalleher, 2009).…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics