Junior Research Paper
Are U.S. airport security regulations for flying too strict?
“Since 9/11, (America’s airport security has) largely been a line of defense ahead of a departure gate to keep dangerous people and dangerous materials off a plane. By Bin Laden’s calculations, its cost $56 billion since 9/11. In one sense, it is worked as planned: No planes have been blown up or hijacked for a decade” (Airport Security Statistics). This quote explains that since 9/11 the airport security’s line of defense has been successful so far in keeping the people and the dangerous materials off the planes. While there are people who think that airport security is too strict, there are others who think that it is just fine the way it is right now. “They check every little thing you bring on to make sure it is not a bomb” (Airport Security Regulations). “Regulations at U.S. airports are not strict, the Bureau of Homeland Security and the T.S.A work very hard to ensure that we are safe when flying” (Airport Security Regulations). Airport security regulations for flying are not too strict. While some may argue that airport security is too strict, it violates our privacy, inconveniences travelers, it is clear that the current rules and regulations are needed for our safety.
The first reason why airport security regulations for flying are not too strict is because safety is more important than convenience. Whenever Americans board a plane they have to go through security first. Part of the process is going through security is too take off shoes. “The reason passengers must remove their shoes in many airports around the world came ten years ago to when Richard Reid, a British Citizen, set out to blow up a bomb in his shoe on board American Airlines Flight 63, from Paris and Miami” (Frischling). By being safer it is important for people to check any materials or belongings and any explosives before they leave their homes. People should pack only necessary things so that there will be minimal problems
“Since 9/11, (America’s airport security has) largely been a line of defense ahead of a departure gate to keep dangerous people and dangerous materials off a plane. By Bin Laden’s calculations, its cost $56 billion since 9/11. In one sense, it is worked as planned: No planes have been blown up or hijacked for a decade” (Airport Security Statistics). This quote explains that since 9/11 the airport security’s line of defense has been successful so far in keeping the people and the dangerous materials off the planes. While there are people who think that airport security is too strict, there are others who think that it is just fine the way it is right now. “They check every little thing you bring on to make sure it is not a bomb” (Airport Security Regulations). “Regulations at U.S. airports are not strict, the Bureau of Homeland Security and the T.S.A work very hard to ensure that we are safe when flying” (Airport Security Regulations). Airport security regulations for flying are not too strict. While some may argue that airport security is too strict, it violates our privacy, inconveniences travelers, it is clear that the current rules and regulations are needed for our safety.
The first reason why airport security regulations for flying are not too strict is because safety is more important than convenience. Whenever Americans board a plane they have to go through security first. Part of the process is going through security is too take off shoes. “The reason passengers must remove their shoes in many airports around the world came ten years ago to when Richard Reid, a British Citizen, set out to blow up a bomb in his shoe on board American Airlines Flight 63, from Paris and Miami” (Frischling). By being safer it is important for people to check any materials or belongings and any explosives before they leave their homes. People should pack only necessary things so that there will be minimal problems
Cited: "Airport Security Statistics: 56 Billion U.S.D Spent since 9/11." The Stat Spotting. Stat Spotting, 6 Dec. 2011. Web. 11 Mar. 2013. . "Are U.S. Airport Security Regulations for Flying Too Strict?" Debate.org. Debate.org, 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2013. . Frischling, Steven. "10 Years Ago Today Airline Travelers Lost Their Shoes" ["The Blog For Those Who Fly and Those Who Want To Fly Smarter"]. Boarding Area. Flying with Fish, 22 Dec. 2011. Web. 9 Mar. 2013. . Grant, Jason. "Report of Fake Bomb at Newark Airport Prompts Call for Security Review." New Jersey.com. New Jersey.com, 9 Mar. 2013. Web. 9 Mar. 2013. . Levi, Ned. "Pack Your Bags to Avoid Security Hand Inspection Loss." Consumer Traveler. Consumer Traveler, 6 June 2011. Web. 20 Mar. 2013. . Montaldo, Charles. "New Airport Security Carry-on Regulations" ["What You Can Now Carry Onto a U.S. Commercial Planes"]. The Crime and Punishment. Crime and Punishment, 2013. Web. 8 Mar. 2013. . Richard, Cicely A. "Air Travel Laws and Regulations." U.S.A Today. Travel Tips, 2011. Web. 20 Mar. 2013. . "Risking Health to Secure Airports" ["Body Scanners: The Story so Far"]. ProPublica. ProPublica, 5 Dec. 2011. Web. 8 Mar. 2013. . "The Truth behind the Airport Full-Body Scanners" ["Airport Body Scanners Catch Drugs, Not Explosives"]. Airport Body S-canner Truth. Phoenix New Times, 14 Sept. 2010. Web. 8 Mar. 2013. . Vegas, Rachel. "Long Airport Security Lines Are Necessary for Safety." Daily Trojan. Daily Trojan, 13 Jan. 2010. Web. 8 Mar. 2013. .