Preview

Judicial Crisis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
531 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Crisis
1988 Judicial Crisis

In 1988,on the ground of misconduct, Tun Salleh Abas by then Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohammad was brought before a tribunal and this tribunal was chaired by Tun Hamid Omar. Due to the constitutionality of the tribunal, Tun Salleh Abas filed a suit in the High Court of Kuala Lumpur and while proceeding, interim stay against the tribunal was applied by Tun Salleh Abas until July 4, 1988 but the request then denied. Later,however, an interlocutory order was granted to Tun Salleh Abas by five judges of the Supreme Court. Tun Salleh Abas’s solicitor, upon receiving the order, rushed to Parliament to lay down the chairman of tribunal of the Interlocutory order.Unfortunatly, Tun Salleh Abas mission was delayed as the gate leading to Parliament was locked and the representatives of Tun Salleh Abas had to call in the police to allow a passage into the Parliament and eventually it was brought up to the tribunal chairman. Soon after, those five judges (Tan Sri Eusoffe Abdoolcader, Tan Sri Azmi Kamaruddin, Tan Sri Wan Hamzah Mohamed Salleh, Datuk George Seah and Tan Sri Wan Suleiman Pawanteh.) was suspended which also, eventually, suspended the Supreme Court.The challenge towards the legality of tribunal could not be heard due to the suspension. But later on, three other judges were repositioned. Due to the inproper dismissal of Tun Salleh Abas led the Bar Council of Malaysia refused to acknowledge the new Lord President.
The sacking of Tun Salleh Abas considered as abhorrent by many ranks of opposition as well as our former government for example Tunku Abdul Rahman but it was insisted by supporter’s of Mahathir that it had liberated the judidciary of Malayia from colonial mindset. The sacking was justified by claims that these several judges been abusing public funds for their personal expenses as in purchasing luxury furniture from Italy. It was also insisted that by the removal of those judges, the efficiency of court was regained.
Having

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Discuss the presentation of the legal establishment in Act One Scene 2 and elsewhere in the play…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Brethren, co-authored by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, is an in-depth documentary of the United States Supreme Court from 1969 to 1975, under the leadership of Warren Burger. The book attempts to present the reader with what "really" goes on in the Supreme Court. It describes the conferences, the personality of justices, and how justice's feel toward each other, items which are generally hidden from the public. This book is comparable to a lengthy newspaper article. Written more as a source of information than of entertainment, The Brethren is the brutal truth, but not boring. The storytelling is clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried.In this trial, the defendant is being tried for killing his father. Some of the men in the jury are chosen very poorly. One example of them being chosen poorly is their past clouds their judgment. Juror number three had a bad past with his son which lead him to believe that all children are ungrateful and useless. “You're right. It's the kids. The way they are you know? They don't listen. I've got a kid. When he was 8 years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I told him right out “I'm going to make a man out of you or I'm going to have to bust you up into little pieces trying.” When he was 15 he hit me in the face. He's big, you know. I haven't seen him in three years. Rotten kid! You work your heart out.... All right let's get on with it.” This is unfair to the defendant because he's now seen as ungrateful and rotten to juror number three even before the case. The US should look…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Judicial Branch is made up of courts. Those courts are the Supreme Court, Circuit Courts and District Court. There are no qualifications for becoming a federal judge. The constitution sets no qualifications but Congress and the departments of justice have their own criteria. The United States Senate has to approve all presidential appointments to the Supreme Court. This is an example of the United States using…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Develop a detailed outline of your third main point. (For assistance with your writing skills, refer to the Ashford Writing Center)…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution and to apply these interpretations to legislation that has been made by Congress as to avoid them from making unconstitutional law. In doing so this is called judicial review in which the Supreme Court takes an active role in intervening in politics. If a law is suggested as being unconstitutional the Supreme Court will either accept or decline and if they accept, this will result in the judiciary then looking at the case and determining whether or not the accusation is true or if the question is entitled to make a claim. In some instances this can be taken too far by the court and they can intervene and end up making a substantial decision on some very controversial issues which would be deemed as unfair by one of the parties, other times their intervention is adequate and justified. I will argue that they are not politically neutral due to the appointment process; however I think they are less like politicians in disguise and more just actively doing their job and interpreting the constitution as how it is supposed to be.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial branch is one of the three branches of the federal government. This branch includes criminal and civil courts and helps interpret the United States constitution. At the constitutional convention of 1787 the birth of the judicial system was born and soon after became adopted to the future of the federal government judicial system. Because of this, the convention it went down in political history and showed the United States how organized and prepared the government was when it came to the court system. But despite the fact that the government was prepared there is a slight controversy that the Judicial branch happens to be the most powerful branch out of the three. What is your belief on the ability and capability of the judicial…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Judicial Branch is the most important branch of the United States government, due to the significant role it plays in interpreting and determining if laws are constitutional. Even though the Judicial Branch is the smallest in size and has smallest budget of any branch in our nation’s government, it exercises enormous power and is equal to other branches of the government because it has the power of Judicial Review. Judicial Review is the review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    "[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Hamilton explained when analyzing the Judiciary’s initial intent. Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution grants the Supreme court “The judicial Power of the United States.” this power can be given to inferior courts such as circuit and district courts as “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Later, in article 3 section 2, the Judicial branch is granted power that “extend[s] to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.” The Judicial branch has explicit power to interpret the intent of past laws, treaties made, and…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Definition of judicial restraint, mention Marbury V Madison (1803). Set out argument strict constructionists argue that the SC should stick to the original intentions of the FF whilst loose constructionists argue that the SC must reinterpret the Constitution in order to move with the times and bring it up-to-date. Judicial restraint has an impact on many members of US society that are not protected under the original Constitution. Main- All decisions whether restrained or activist have huge political significance. E.g. abortion, Rights of African Americans, etc. If restrained, the court can turn away cases and choose not to even hear them. The SC can pick and choose (they only choose between 90-100 cases to hear a year). Liberals argue…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let me first point out that no one man is better than the other. Human life has no color only skin in its various shades. The Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution at times is interpreted out of the original context that it was intended in my opinion. Despite the students in this law suit are…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court Analysis

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I think some of the work of the Supreme Court is constrained by institutional roles and procedures but the vast majority of work done by the Supreme Court is autonomous. One of the first examples of constraint by an institutional role and longstanding tradition in the book “A Wild Justice” is “In the early 1960s, the notion that executions were cruel and unusual punishment seemed fanciful. When the Founding Fathers drafted the Constitution, the death penalty was mandatory for most felonies and used in every state. The Fifth Amendment referenced capital crimes explicitly and implicitly when it said no person should be deprived of “life, liberty, or property” without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment, adopted in the aftermath of…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By establishing fixed sentencing periods, judges have minimal discretionary powers to influence the penalty. Any question of partiality of the sentencing portion of a trial would be removed and consequently, judges would be able to make unbiased and principled decisions (Determinate Sentencing Pros and Cons 2014). In doing so, they would be able to maintain the rule of law. The rule of law in the contemporary Australian legal system promotes equal access to justice for all (Vines 2013, p. 319). As significant figures of the judicial system, judges must ensure that courts are independent, impartial, open and transparent and provides a fair and prompt trial (Rule of Law Institute of Australia 2015). This could be an issue with indeterminate sentencing…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Review

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the 1920’s a heightened suspicion of communist activities on domestic American land arose, the Red Scare. Benjamin Gitlow, a prominent member of the Socialist party, was arrested and convicted on charges of violating the New York Criminal Anarchy Law of 1902 during these drastic times. What was his violation? The publication and circulation of the Left-Wing Manifesto, a mere pamphlet, in the United States was his infringement. He appealed the decision on the basis that it violated his First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and press and it was passed on to the United States Supreme Court. The court ruled 7-2 in favor of Gitlow on the basis of Section 1 of the Fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution states, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Gitlow v. New York exemplifies the protection of civil right and liberties with judicial activism.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Selection

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In recent years judicial selection has become an issue of great debate with many different views and ways to make it better. In Texas, judicial selection is carried out by partisan elections where voters get to choose the judges and justices. This form of judicial selection has many advantages as well as some disadvantages.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics