Preview

Joseph Conrad, Chinua Achebe, and the Question of Racism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1321 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Joseph Conrad, Chinua Achebe, and the Question of Racism
Victoria Saha

1/15/13 * Is it Racism if We Are Portraying Our Own Race? * * Throughout history racism has always been an issue. Joseph Conrad and Chinua Achebe are both literary philosophers. Although they have different opinions, both writers have written about a particular race. In 1899 Joseph Conrad had written the infamous Heart of Darkness and in response to what Achebe thought was racism towards Africans Chinua Achebe wrote Things Fall Apart in 1959 to prove Africans were civilized. There has been much controversy over Joseph Conrad being a racist, but it can be proved that Conrad is in fact not a racist because he was writing about what he saw on his journey to Congo. It was an entirely different time period where imperialism had taken over and Chinua Achebe is also contradicting himself by writing negative things about both people of his race and of Europeans. While traveling to Africa, Joseph Conrad seems to have witnessed crucial parts of the African culture. As a white man in unfamiliar atmosphere he was being realistic about what he saw and stating them through the eyes of the protagonist “Marlow” an imperialist in Africa. While living in the forest for quite some time with the native Africans Marlow had soon begun comparing the humanity between Europeans and the Africans. Marlow states, “This suspicion of their not being inhuman. It would come slowly to one. They howled and leaped and spun and made horrid faces, but what thrilled you was just the thought of their humanity-like yours- the thought of your remote kinship with this wild and passionate uproar”(HOD pg 89).
Marlow slowly begins to see slight resemblance of kinship with the native Africans. The circumstances of his surroundings in the wilderness compel him to see humanity in Africans, which he thought was impossible. Even to the extent that Africans and Europeans originated from the same place. Cedric Watts,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, the main character, Marlow travels through the Congo, witnessing scenes of torture, cruelty and near-slavery. The incidental scenery of the book offers a harsh picture of colonial enterprise. The book is regarded as an attack on imperialism and criticizes the immoral treatments of the European colonizers in Africa in the 19th century. However, the dehumanization of the Africans, and use of Africa as a backdrop setting for Marlow’s thought process, rather than an important focus has to do with hypocrisy inherent in the rhetoric used to justify imperialism.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 19th century, Britain was the most powerful and influential nation in the world; its Empire was spread throughout Europe, Asia and Africa. Explorers were constantly going to these newly conquered lands to spread English culture in an attempt to “civilize” the natives that were living there. Joseph Conrad was an explorer who traveled around the world to the various regions under Britain’s control. Even though he may have taken pride in the extent of the British Empire’s territory, it does not mean that he agreed with their method of “civilizing” the natives after experiencing it first hand on his trip to the Congo. One might ask, how does Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’ feed the concept of postcolonial criticism? Throughout the entirety of the work, we are shown British Imperialism through…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He outwardly castigates Conrad’s novel as being racist and demeaning to non-white cultures. Chinua Achebe criticizes Conrad’s depiction of Africa as being stereotypical in the views of Western culture. One of Achebe’s fundamental arguments is that Conrad is advertising a false version of the African continent and its people. He portrays them as being hostile and uncivilized through the accounts of the main character, Marlow. Achebe is infuriated at this notion because Conrad’s style of writing covers up the true nature of its meaning. He believes that this form of writing emanates from Conrad’s own racist beliefs and upbringings as a child. Specific citations from the story indicate that Conrad put the Europeans on a higher pedestal as he characterizes them as being “illuminating”, and “twinkling” with brilliant ideas (Achebe 3). Conrad’s racism is delineated perfectly when there is an encounter with a black man and he describes his feelings as being “blind, furious, and unreasoning rage” when he encountered this man (Conrad 11). This vast disparity of descriptions of the two races show his inner thoughts and his hatred towards non-whites. According to Achebe "Conrad appears to go to considerable pains to set up layers of insulation between himself and the moral universe of his story”(Conrad 14). This is exactly how Conrad uses his stylistic form of writing to cover up these feelings of hatred and detest towards the African continent and its population. Achebe also points out that Conrad’s depiction of the rivers is a symbolic sign of his inherent racism. He states in his story that "going up that river was like traveling back to the earliest beginnings of the world” (Conrad 9). This is referencing the Congo River that led to Africa and Conrad uses a negative connotation in describing…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the imperial conquests of Africa, Europeans in general held very low opinions of those that they dominated. Instead viewing the native African people as sub-human, or tools if they were particularly fond of an individual. While Heart of Darkness presents itself as anti-imperial, Marlow, and by extension Conrad still display an astonishingly undesirable view of the tribes assisting himself and Kurtz. For example, there exists an International Society for the Suppression of Savage Customs that Kurtz writes a report for. To Marlow it is an elegant paper that he cannot help but praise for its elegance. The contents of this paper suggest that the Europeans, to, “exert a power for good,” must appear as gods, deities, and supernatural beings…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He explains how innocently people make racial comments against the other races, and still regard themselves as none racists. He further informs the reader about men who are known to be friendly but make innocent comments and in the end concludes that their comments renders them “open to the accusation” (Bissoondath, p. 84) thereby making them vulnerable to be considered as racists. In the same manner, Conrad’s use of racial inhumane words through Marlow renders his work sensitive to racial accusations. The Europeans cruelty was seen on the way they overworked the natives, mistreated them, gave them neither food nor proper medical care and left them to die. Marlow mercilessly describes a pair as bundles, “two more bundles of acute angles sat with their legs drawn up […]” (Conrad, p. 28) a position that could be seen as defensive or a way in which they used to keep warm. Marlow also calls one of them a “creature that arose to his hands and knees and went off on all-fours toward the river […]” (Conrad, p. 28). The natives are overworked and underfed and have grown weak to support their human posture. Just because the particular native was unable to walk himself to the river does not guarantee Marlow the right to call him a creature. Also through Marlow’s eyes, they are also seen as shapes when Conrad describes them as “black shapes […], moribund shapes […] that crouched […], clinging to the earth, half coming out, half effaced […]”(Conrad, p. 28). Marlow himself witnessed how miserable and at a point of death this natives were, and having being led to an unknown land, all they could do was to defend their lifeless body from any further attack. It is completely unethical for Marlow to also describe them as “raw matter” (Conrad, p. 25) and their leader as “one of the reclaimed, the product of […]” (Conrad, p. 25) or does it seem correct for him to call them “strings of dusty niggers…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right as Marlow arrives at his station for the first time, he realizes how brutal Kurtz and his men treat the natives. As he walks to his building, some natives walk by with "black rags wound round their loins, and the short ends wagged to and fro like tails" (18). The verb "wagged" gives the natives animalistic qualities as they appear to have tails. Typically a dog 's tail wags when it is running or works hard. Marlow consciously makes this comparison of dogs with the natives, which shows his apathetic feeling towards them as he knows he reduces them to less than human, yet he continues to do so. This emphasizes how racism flies under the radar as Marlow is giving humans the qualities of an animal without even thinking about it. Furthermore, just as Marlow gets off the ship and continues towards his cabin, he sees several "black shapes crouched . . . between the trees" (19). Conrad 's usage of "crouched" likens the natives to feral cats, such as panthers or lions. Adding to this dehumanization is the metaphor of the natives as "black shapes" that aren 't even identifiable as human. This metaphorical concept is extended throughout the text with other inanimate objects as stand-ins for the natives. The apathetic tone appears again in their unwillingness to…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, I think that the racism claims are overstated, in two ways. A) Conrad's racism, such as it is, is directed not at black people as a whole but rather as Africans. I think the prejudice must be recognized as activism, or whatever the proper term is, rather than as racism. B) Conrad is critical, not solely of Africans and their way of life, but also of European culture. He's just as anti-white as he is also anti-black. Additionally, I think that Conrad may be considered a racist if and only if you decide that the definition of racism is thinking your race is better, but I really don't think that he could be considered a white supremacist or that he really contained a deep hatred for Africans. In fact, I don't think that he was even that serious on his own race. It is because that overtime he describes the presence of the white imperialist or any white people in general, he describes them in a bitter, dark way. And while he describes the Africans in a sort of blunt way as natural, rustic, raw people. I also think he does it in a much lighter way. I don't think he criticizes the way they were. I just think he is ignorant of the political correctness found in today's society.…

    • 629 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a mystery to Marlow why the slaves refrain from allowing the primitive hedonistic nature of hunger to run its course. In a brief moment he is dazzled by slaves restraint, they are acting more civilized than his colleagues are in the face of danger. Marlow considers this fact to be “…like a ripple on an unfathomable enigma, a mystery greater—when I thought of it—than the curious, inexplicable note of desperate grief in this savage clamour that had swept by us on the river-bank…(Conrad 38). As a ripple alters perception Marlow’s ability to make sense of humanity is in constant transformation. The imperialism of Africa is subject to grand interpretation, for Marlow it near impossible to comprehend. A symbol of the white conquest of Africa is displayed as “the foam on the depths of the sea” (Conrad 38). Moreover, Africa is equally foreign to white people as the depths of the ocean; only the exterior can be discerned. Throughout the story Marlow is constantly challenged by the “unfathomable enigma”(Conrad 38) that is the imperialism of Africa. The madness of…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belonging

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Conrad explores the element of not belonging to a great extent through the presence of cultural barriers dictated by the European exploitation of the natives. Contextually, Africa was seen to be the ‘antithesis to Europe’, hence the natives were seen to be ‘less civilised’ and inferior, hence were unable to express their own personal opinions due to their oppression in the hierarchical structure, hindering societal and cultural belonging. Throughout the novella, they are referred to as ‘negros, savages and rudimentary souls’ who work for the Europeans, yet get nothing in return except mistreatment. The list of ruthless descriptions creates a detached tone that conjures a sense of isolation. The horrific sensory imagery of the natives with ‘iron collars around their neck tied together with a chain’ symbolically represents the subjugation…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1: Achebe is right in saying, Conrad's portrayal of the african civilizations and africans is just as damaging. Conrad looks at them in a negative light. He writes “ the men were inhuman”, and “ They howled and leaped, and spun, and made horrid faces on the shore of the river; but what thrilled you was the thought of their humanity-the thought you may be related to them and their wildness in some way. Conrad sees their culture as strange, because it is new and different. He does not attempt to show the good side of the culture, like Achebe when he writes about the peoples beliefs and festivities.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hawkins argues that Conrad implements the evolutionary trope in Heart of Darkness, but also exposes the downfall of Europeans by showing their desire for merciless control and inhumane actions to control the African colonies. An evolutionary trope is a developmental logic that white civilization is more advanced than African civilizations (Lecture 2/16/17). Kurtz himself is a representation of Europe because he is a civilized man who becomes barbaric and savage after living in Africa. In addition, Hawkins noted that in Heart of Darkness, racism explicitly occurred as “Conrad likely didn’t show more of the Africans because he wanted to focus on the Europeans” (370). Much like Kurtz himself, Conrad and Marlow conceal a lot in their use of sophisticated words and diction. In addition, their high-strung eloquence is very underrated; people will do anything that the voice asks them to do, including the African people. Ultimately, by denying the humanity of Africa, Europeans are destroying their own humanity, and therefore, Europe is destroying…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To allow the convicts to proceed up the trail, Marlow steps into a grove of trees. How does his impression of the Africans there compare to his attitude towards the convicts?…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Heart of Darkness: Cruelty

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    white men with the Africans. Conrad knew that the white men who come to Africa…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conrad uses this to show that the consumer society is ignorant to the atrocities that must happen to support their economy. The colonist working for the company are constantly under the false impression that they are there to better the people of Africa, "the laborer is worthy of his hire" (58), which distracts them from their real purpose, which is exploiting the land. The only time that the readers get the literal sensation of this is when Marlow is stuck in the fog while going up the Congo. The fog obscures the workers from the jungle, and Marlow from his sense of direction. “It was very curious to see the contrast of the expressions of the white men and the black fellows of our crew, who were as much strangers to that part of the river as we" (97).…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Achebe's "An Image of Africa : Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness" (The Massachusetts Review, 18 (1977) : 782 - 94) expresses a passionate objection to Conrad's point of view and portrayal of Africa and Africans in his novel Heart of Darkness. Achebe's novel, Things Fall Apart, can be considered the direct opposition to Conrad's Heart of Darkness and is seen to as a challenge on Conrad's western views. I shall explore the validity in Achebe's "An Image of Africa : Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness" with regards to language, characterisation, religion and culture. Other opinions from critical readings will also be included and referenced to the two novels ( Things Fall Apart & Heart of Darkness ).Achebe felt that Conrad's Heart of Darkness "others" Africa and Africans, when he says "others" he means that it represents the Africans as a colonised people who have little "common sense" and no authority. Furthermore it shows them as a separate race or species to further illustrate how they were treated as animals and savages. The term "common sense" used earlier also illustrates how Achebe took offence to the Western ideologies in that "common sense" is a term invented by Westerners. "Common sense" is the general term one uses for Western beliefs and values but other cultures (especially African cultures) have not been included as a part of this terminology. African cultures are, in fact, criticized by the term "common sense", which once again Achebe took offence to. Achebe felt that Heart of Darkness was also a way of "writing back to the centre" in that it represented the Western people or Colonists as the dominant and superior force, to Achebe it was an alienation of the Africans and Africa. Heart of Darkness, therefore displaced the Africans in the novel; instead of them seeming good and familiar, they were distanced from the reader. Hence, one can see how Achebe was a strong believer in the "Postcolonial Theory" whereby he mostly challenged but also reflected…

    • 3071 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays