Preview

Joseph Andrews

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1380 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Joseph Andrews
Stephen Conway
1996
Plato, Aristotle, and Mimesis

As literary critics, Plato and Aristotle disagree profoundly about the value of art in human society. Plato attempts to strip artists of the power and prominence they enjoy in his society, while Aristotle tries to develop a method of inquiry to determine the merits of an individual work of art. It is interesting to note that these two disparate notions of art are based upon the same fundamental assumption: that art is a form of mimesis, imitation. Both philosophers are concerned with the artist’s ability to have significant impact on others. It is the imitative function of art which promotes disdain in Plato and curiosity in Aristotle. Examining the reality that art professes to imitate, the process of imitation, and the inherent strengths and weaknesses of imitation as a form of artistic expression may lead to understanding how these conflicting views of art could develop from a seemingly similar premise. Both philosophers hold radically different notions of reality. The assumptions each man makes about truth, knowledge, and goodness directly affect their specific ideas about art. For Plato, art imitates a world that is already far removed from authentic reality, Truth. Truth exists only in intellectual abstraction, that is, paradoxically, more real than concrete objects. The universal essence, the Idea, the Form of a thing, is more real and thus more important than its physical substance. The physical world, the world of appearances experienced through the senses, does not harbor reality. This tangible world is an imperfect reflection of the universal world of Forms. Human observations based on these reflections are, therefore, highly suspect. At best, the tangible fruit of any human labor is "an indistinct expression of truth" (Republic X, 22). Because knowledge of truth and knowledge of good are virtually inseparable to Plato, he counsels rejection of the physical in favor of embracing reason in an



Cited: Aristotle. “Poetics” The Critical Tradition. Ed., David H. Richter, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1989. Plato. “Republic, Book X” The Critical Tradition. Ed., David H. Richter, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1989.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Danto begins “The Artworld” by going after Socrates’ and Plato’s view of art as imitation or a mirror. He calls this the “Imitation Theory” or “IT”. If this were accurate then any image reflected in a mirror would also be considered an artwork. Although, many artists during Socrates’ and Plato’s time and later tried to imitate nature into their art. The advancements of photography ultimately ended this as an artform and proved the Imitation Theory to be false.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The painting should be an original, not a reproduction” (Winterson 8). The reproduction of art diminishes the originality and authenticity of the piece. Not only does this diminish originality but bypasses giving the appropriate credit to the founder. In the novel Art Objects: Essays on Ecstasy and Effrontery Winterson asserts that an artist needs to be familiar with past art, this is important in ensuring that contemporary artists do not plagiarize past work.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato felt that there are two different levels of reality compared to Aristotle who felt that there was only one level of reality. Plato’s way of thinking always came from ideas from within that were applied to the outside world as opposed to Aristotle whose ideas came from the outside world and then were applied within. These contrast ideas were a result in Aristotle believing that there is one level of reality. He believed that there was only one world, and that forms existed in particular things. Aristotle felt that everything was matter, and certain kinds of matter were composed into different things. He believed that form did not have a separate existence, but existed in matter. Plato, however, believed that there were two levels of reality. Physical and mental were two different things in his eyes. Physical is what is real and you can see and/or touch, and mental is what seems to be real but cannot be seen such as air. Plato believed that there are “two worlds” and that everything real has a form but does not symbolize that form.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All people from Texas ride horses, white guys can’t dance and Asians are very good at math. Some stereotypes are humorous but others for example, one dangerous pre-notion is that African-Americans are more likely to become professional athletes then acquire a real job like a doctor or lawyer. This is an illusion portrayed by the coaches and teachers who promote athleticism over academics. Plato’s “The Allegory of the cave” shows us that “chains” and “shadows” keeps one from being enlightened, just like these young African-Americans. Henry Louis Gates Jr’s “Delusions of Grandeur” tells how this illusion “chains” down the African-American youth to a mindset of professional sports. Gates illuminates the devastating effects of the “shadows” being cast and “chains” being imposed on African-American minds keeping them in a “cave” of ignorance and keeping them unenlightened to the possibilities around them.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believed that reality is more than what we sense around the world (e.g. taste, smell, hear, see and touch), he believed that behind these physical realities lies a perfect version of them in which he called Forms and that the greatest thing we can learn is to have knowledge and understanding of them. Plato’s theory means that what we can sense around us (for example a chair) is just a mere shadow of the perfect version which exists in the world of Forms. The perfect version of a chair is one in which for fills its purpose e.g. to be comfortable and to be sat on. Plato believed that everything had a perfect Form, from objects such as pens and books to things such as beauty and justice. He believed that to experience the world of Forms we had to become perfect philosophers.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato looked for a universal reality, or concept that made an object what it was. For example, a pizza is round. The roundness was an eternal concept . The physical pizza being round was temporary, it would not always be round. If you ate a slice it would no longer be round or if you dropped it and the slices became disorganized, it would no longer be round. But the sponsoring concept of round would always be round. The concept was eternal. It was a form and forms never change. Physical objects were a crude and inadequate representation of their form. To Plato, to understand his theory of forms one must transcend the physical world by going beyond the senses to get to a higher reality where true concepts existed. In this higher reality, roundness (truth) is unchanging. When one reaches this true reality, one then has knowledge and wisdom. He felt that very few people were willing or able to transcend to this higher reality because the human condition was a trap that distracted the mind from truth. He theorized that forms were eternal and one must have forms to gain knowledge and to do that you must disengage from this world to discover an objects form.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Aristotle. Poetics. The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed.David H. Richter. 2nd. Ed. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 42-64.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's theory of forms, also called his theory of ideas, states that there is another world, separate from the material world that we live in called the "eternal world of forms". This world, to Plato, is more real than the one we live in. His theory is shown in his Allegory of the Cave (from The Republic, Book VII), where the prisoners only live in what they think is a real world, but really it is a shadow of reality. According to Plato, to the prisoners in the allegory and to humanity in the material world "truth would be literally nothing but shadows" and he believes us to be as ignorant as the people in the cave. Plato followed the belief that in order for something to be real it has to be permanent, and as everything in the world we live in is constantly changing, he assumed there must be something else. In his eternal world of forms, there is an ideal form of every object there is in this world. Plato answers the question "what is beauty?" by discovering the essence of true beauty. The reason one recognises something has being beautiful is because we have an innate knowledge of something that is beauty, i.e. we know of the form of true beauty in the eternal world of forms, and everything we see compares to that. Something is only beautiful if it shares characteristics with the form of beauty in the other world. The most important form is the form of the good, portrayed by the sun in the allegory of the cave.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greek artists were the first to establish mimesis (imitation of nature) as a guiding principle for art, even as Greek philosophers debated the intellectual value of this approach. The repeated depiction of the nude human figure in Greek art reflects Greek humanism—a belief that 'Man is the measure of all things,' in the words of Greek…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Plato would argue that everything we see and touch is only partially real; they are replicas of the true actuality. On the other hand, justice, courage, moderation, wisdom, and beauty are true realities for Plato. He calls these the Forms. They are not visible to the senses, but by overcoming bodily desires, the mind can straightforwardly perceive these real truths. Plato nearly teaches…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believed that reality is more than what we sense around the world (e.g. taste, smell, hear, see and touch), he believed that behind these physical realities lies a perfect version of them in which he called Forms and that the greatest thing we can learn is to have knowledge and understanding of them.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato vs. Nietzsche

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The central ideas that two great philosophers, Plato and Friedrich Nietzsche, talked about were the reality and appearance; and what they mainly focused on is where we as humans stand between these two. Of course, regarding the fact that Plato and Nietzsche lived in different time periods, they had their differences that conflict with each other’s theories. But they do have something to agree upon; they both argue that humans live in an illusory world of our own that we think is reality when we actually are not. One important idea they disagree on is their concepts on what is reality and what is truth. Plato’s theory is mostly based on his cave allegory where he explains human’s conditions. I will explain the similarities and differences between Plato and Nietzsche through the cave allegory.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a link between what individuals learn and how they conduct themselves. Plato and Tolstoy; although they are thousands of years apart both had the notion that art is able to corrupt minds, but the question at hand is whether or not their theory is still relevant. Pop culture seems to have corrupted the minds of individuals today because it makes its audience feel that engaging in deviant behavior is morally acceptable. Being that the artists convey their visions through their work, and the vehicle that they use to express themselves is through pop culture, their intent can be overshadowed by their desire to appeal to the masses. In James Harold’s article,”A Moral Never-Never Land:Identify with Tony Soprano”, he analyzes Plato’s and Tolstoy’s concerns about the morality of art through the observations of the character Tony Soprano. Although Tony Soprano is a notorious gangster, he is accepted despite his villainous…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Art for Me?

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Art has been created by all people at all times; it lives because it is liked and enjoyed. Art involves personal experiences of an individual accompanied by some intensity of emotion. Art is made of man, no matter how close it is to nature. Although each work of art is evidently the expression of an artists’ personal thoughts and feelings it may be inferred that, like any other individual, he belongs to a million, and he cannot free himself from the influence of his social, economic, political, cultural, geographic, scientific, and technological environment.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays