Preview

John Hick and the Problem of Evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
541 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Hick and the Problem of Evil
I am writing on John Hick’s piece entitled There Is a Reason Why God Allows Evil. In the selection Hick explains a theodicy, a justification of God’s goodness because of evil, the soul-making view of life in this defense of God’s way in the face of evil. The dilemma of the problem of evil is, if God is perfectly loving he must wish to abolish evil. If evil exists then God cannot be all perfectly loving. Hick’s theodicy, the soul-making view, states that God intentionally placed this evils on earth so that we can over come temptations. God wants humans to go through these test of our convictions so that they can choose good, and they can ultimately undergo spiritual growth. Hick believes that this is not evil but good, and most cannot see though the belief that the world is supposed to be a paradise. Hick talks briefly about how man creates its own evils, by its inhumanities and ignorance. He states that stemming from that comes oppression, poverty, and war. Then he goes on the explain their is also natural evils such as earthquakes, tornadoes, and floods. If man was created by God as a fully functional creature, and world is a place that is our paradise to live in. How could it be plausible for an all loving God to have the natural and moral evils to be seeded in his creation, therefor he could not be all-loving. This theory also has the basis of free will, the fact that we can chose the path that we want to take in the face of temptation. The soul-making view is also known as the Irenaean theory. This traditional view comes from the Greek Church, and was added on to by John Hick. It states that God is working with humanity to help with social interactions, moral behavior, and reflection. Hick says that we go through two stages, first is that we are created and have imagination and creation, second is that we struggle and suffer. Doing this process makes us more like God. The other type of theodicy is the Augustinian position. That is that Go created humans

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Here John Wick confronts the classic Christian teaching rejection of evil by introducing Augustine’s theory. Augustine holds the conviction that the universe is inherently good, but if so, where does evil originate? In Augustine’s theory, he suggests that every matter that God creates is in some form of good, however God did not place disorder or distortion of good in the universe. This is what he means that “evil represents the going wrong of something which in itself is good”: while matter is born good, the perception of good varies resulting the outcome of perceived evil. In a social situation, what I perceive as good, others may perceive as off. Every matter is good, until I distort the value of…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Grace Janizen’s “Whose Problem Is the ‘Problem of Evil’”, she points out the philosophers spent too much trying to answer why God created a world with evil in it and not answering more important questions. She starts off by saying that people spend too much on the matter whether good is too God to create a world with evil in it. She also explains the type of people that try to explain evil in the world, the veil of soul-making who believe that evil helps people become a better person. The other type is the free-will defense is God can only do logical things, but a world filled with evil is not very logical. Instead she feels that people should focus on other questions like if God allowed there to evil then should we really try fit those…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    protocol paper 1

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Recall: In "The problem of evil," James Rachels and Stuart Rachels provider some important point: 1) Pain is not body’s warning system needed, because newborn babies did not deserve inexorable pain; 2) Even If we need evil to appreciate the good, but it is does not explain why there is such an extraordinary amount of evil in this world; 3) The doctrine of original sin was absurd. According to authors, it would be come to a conclusion that a newborn baby did deserve terrible disease. 4) The idea that Free Will Defense is in apparent contradiction to the natural evil in the world. 5) Based on the idea that a world without suffering would be void of the virtues necessary for good moral development. It does not explain the reason that God allowed the Holocaust or isolated cases of extreme cruelty to happen. 6) The theory of moral development does not explain the reason why animals suffering.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious folk claim that God is all-benevolent. If this is the case, then why is evil permitted to exist? When faced with this question, believers state that evil exists to promote “the greater good”. The greater good is the idea that some pain and suffering must exist in the world for us as humans to access our second and third level “good” platforms. These levels consist of human qualities such as courageousness, charity and sacrifice. Believers claim that life would not be as good, or as whole, without knowing these feelings, however, I argue that if we never knew any of the “higher level” qualities, then we wouldn’t miss them. If, from the beginning, we only knew the first level good, and knew no pain and suffering, then we wouldn’t know any different. Could it not be a better life, a better world, with absolutely no pain, suffering or evil? So, the question remains, if God is wholly good then how does evil exist? It is possible that God is not completely good, it may be that He permits some evil to exist so we can reach our “greater goods.” On the opposing side of that theory, is it actually that there may not be a God and that evil is a product of our human nature, as well as the good in the world.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A famous Greek Philosopher named Plato was a duellist who believed that the soul is indeed distinct from the body. Plato believed that the soul is more important than the body as the body is apart of the empirical world and like all objects is subject to change (in a constant motion of change). Plato said that the body and its senses cannot be a reliable guide to the truth as it did not pre – exist in his idea of “the world of forms” and so the body can only seek truth from experience which in reality would not be the “real truth”. Plato also believed that the soul enables us to have knowledge as it pre-existed before birth in the world of forms. This is said to be the reason why we can understand things such as beauty in the world as the soul had already experienced them prior to our existence.…

    • 698 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with the free will theodicy is that not all theologies are consistent or hold identical positions (Elwell, pg 1184). Elwell also states, that the “free will defense is an inappropriate answer to the problem of moral evil, since the notion of freedom involved in the free will defense is incompatible with the freedom involved in the Calvinistic system (Elwell, pg 1184).” Elwell writes about another theodicy which is the soul building theodicy, this theodicy rests upon a rationalist theology (Elwell, pg 1186) John Hick asks a good question by saying, “What sort of environment would be most conducive to soul-building?” I feel that would be good reason for sin to be present in everyday life, which allows God to show His mercy and grace. Elwell also writes about the fact of having an Edenic paradise would currently take away from a world to win souls to Christ. With Hick’s theology on the subject, Elwell notes that this would not be accepted by some as a whole due to the way it is outlined (Elwell, pg 1186). The intent of a consistent theodicy is to avoid self-contradiction (Elwell, pg 1187). For example, if you write a theodicy explaining evil and try to justify it by…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Problem of Evil Lyndsey Emry PHIL 1381-17 Introduction to Philosophy Professor Bannister The problem of evil is the problem of reconciling the existence of the evil in the world with the existence of an omniscient God because if God were all-knowing, it seems that God would know about all of the horrible things that happen in our world. The problem of evil also brings up the problem with an omnipotent God because if God were all-powerful, God would be able to stop all of the evil and suffering in the world. Furthermore, the problem of evil also challenges an omnibenevolent God because if God were morally perfect, then surely God would want to do something about it.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophy 8

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chapter III focuses on the problem of evil. The table of contents shows it contains discussions on God and evil, evil with regard to varieties of atheism, and free will with evil. The titles and descriptions of this chapter show how it relates to things this class has already discussed; God’s goodness with respect to evil, and free will. These topics are therefore a continuation of that which we have already learned and are familiar with.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evil Vs Religion

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The presence of evil and grief be situated the furthermost earnest complication in the creation, Also the single serious contest to conviction in the reality of an ethical God. Difficult of evil is difficult of reunion the realism of the evil in the creation with the realism of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and an impeccably virtuous God. The presence of immoral is definite by the inconsistency of the following theistic opinions: First, God is omnipotent means with certainly not any boundaries to what an omnipotent creature can do. Second, God is exclusively good defines as a creature is opposite to evil in a manner that it rejects evil as remote as it can. Third, Evil subsists symbolizes any faultiness in the creation. Fourth, God subsists…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problem Of Evil

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For example, the punishment theodicy proposes the idea that evil is just a form of punishment for sin, although there are many instances that “punishments” seem far too severe for any sin possibly committed. The soul-building theodicy claims that evil is necessary for human development, as “sin and suffering is valuable… because improvement of character.” One of the main responses is with the free will theodicy, though, and focuses on God choosing upon creation of beings to make them free. Though this choice posed the risk of agents freely choosing to do evil, the benefits ultimately outweighed the risk because of the inherent value placed on libertarian free will. Because of free will, people have “moral responsibility for their actions” and can be considered “creators in their own right,” so God is justified in giving people free will, but not responsible for their reprehensible choices (Timmons and Shoemaker, 308). As always, there are objections to this argument, one of the principal ones being that there are many natural evils that occur without a freely willed decision leading to it. For example, hurricanes and disease causing suffering and death. However, where there is reason for believing in a supernatural God, there can be reason for believing in entities such as demons as well. These natural evils could result from the free choices of said demons, thus classifying them as moral evils in the end as well. Another objection to the free will targets the true “benefits” of beings having free will. With free will comes desires to do wrong, but if the wrong is combatted by the desire to do right, and morality wins, satisfaction follows. However, in some extreme cases, is the desire to murder people really worth the “good feeling” after choosing not to? It appears that these immoral inclinations may not seem to be truly…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Shocking Alternative

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For most part, the heaviest question asked throughout this chapter is why evil exists, and why God allowed it to exist. A human being who is probably sick and tired of all the evil and suffering in the world would say that if only evil can just stop existing – if only suffering would stop. If only human beings had no instincts that would push them to do the wrong thing. I used to think this way; why can’t we exist in a world where evil is absent? After reading this chapter and listening to the explanations in class, I realized that evil actually makes way for love. I thought about how it would be much better for evil to exist, than for it to be non-existent but along with it, the absence of love. Several movies have already been made about a utopia – a sort of paradise where everyone is the same and there is only good, but the movie always takes a sour turn and ends up in chaos. I then think about some people who look as if they exist around this concept of evil: hurting other people, not caring about their bodies, swearing off God, thinking they are the masters of their own lives. The thing is, most of the time these people often look happy. Ignorance is bliss, as they say. Sometimes it comes to a point where the temptation kicks on to be much like them. Gladly though, it has never fully consumed me. After much evaluation and some time ‘observing’ these people who seem to be having all the fun in the world, I discovered that their happiness, their so-called love, was fleeting. In a sense, it was not real, it was not true, and it was not pure. A phrase from the chapter then starts to make sense: “What Satan put into the heads of our remote ancestors own as if they had created themselves – be their own masters – invent some sort of happiness for themselves outside…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Why Does God Allow Evil” Richard Swinburne argues that evil exists in the world because of the existence of a good, omnipotent God. His strongest argument is that there is a difference between moral evil and natural evil and each are necessary for the world’s good. Therefore, any wrongdoings by an individual is done with intent through negligence, rather than an act of God. On the other side, in “Karma, Rebirth and the Problem of Evil” Whitley R.P. Kaufman, contends that the problem of evil is constructed around the assumption that there is a God and that is it a universal problem. Karma is not the justification of God for individuals’ wrongdoings, it is because what happened in the former life has a way of punishing you in the present.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays