The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…
Antony Flew wrote that the biggest challenge to the believer is accepting that the existence of evil and suffering is a major problem that demands an adequate response. The problem faced by monotheists demands a solution, not of qualification; in which the nature of God is arbitrarily changed to suit different circumstances – this concept of God ‘dies the death of a thousand qualifications,’ but by the rational justification of God’s right to allow evil and suffering to…
The question of evil is a common hot button topic among atheists and non-Christians who attempt to disprove Christianity. They argue that an omnipotent and omniscient God cannot exist in a world with so much evil. The argument is used by them to try to prove that Christianity is “internally self-contradictory and thereby to be rejected.” Many claim that a benevolent and caring God would certainly not create evil or allow it to flourish in the world that He created. So, the problem of evil is how to explain that there can be a perfect, all-powerful, and all-loving God that exists in a world with so much moral and natural evil.…
Evil comes in as the obstacle coarse in the way of the ultimate prize. After all, with such a great goal, it shouldn't be easy. Though this doesn't really answer the question of where evil came from, or why God allows it. Irenaeus believes that we chose it when humanity fell in Creation. That justifies moral evil. But what of natural evil? Why did God want this journey to take place in such a hazardous environment, with earthquakes and pestilence, and in such frail form, which is susceptible to such dangers? Hick's response is that moral and spiritual development does not take place in a static environment but comes as the result of challenge and struggle and…
There are three major points about Hick’s development of Irenaeus’ argument; we had to be created imperfect, we had to be distanced from god and the natural world cannot be a paradise. The first two account for the existence of moral evil in the world and the last accounts for natural evil. Firstly concerning imperfection; Hick argued that man is in a constant state of creational evolvement. According to the Irenaeun tradition, man is created in two steps, Bios and Zoe. Bios is the physical creation of man in the image of God and Zoe is mans attainment of the likeness of God.…
Rood, Rick (1996) The Problem of Evil: How Can a Good God Allow Evil. Retrieved;…
Summary: James Rachels addresses the conflicts of evil in his book “Problems from Philosophy” by providing various forms of logical problems. The author points out the different possible explanations to why evil would exist. The first major idea Rachels makes is that perhaps pain is essential to caution people of danger. He goes on to suggest that this would not account for why some people are born with deadly diseases. Another idea he makes is that evil helps people appreciate the good in life. One would not be able to distinguish the good in life if evil did not exist. However, this does not explain why the world needs so much evil to exist, instead of letting a few bad things happen occasionally. The third idea the author makes questions why bad things happen to good people. Rachels suggests maybe those bad things that occur in life are…
The problem of evil has been around since the beginning. How could God allow such suffering of his “chosen people”? God is supposedly all loving (omni-benevolent) and all powerful (omnipotent) and yet He allows His creations to live in a world of danger and pain. Two philosophers this class has discussed pertaining to this problem is B.C. Johnson and John Hick. Johnson provides the theists’ defense of God and he argues them. These include free will, moral urgency, the laws of nature, and God’s “higher morality”. Hick examines two types of theodicies – the Augustinian position and the Irenaeus position. These positions also deal with free will, virtue (or moral urgency), and the laws of nature. Johnson decides that God is either evil or both good and evil. Hick believes that the world is the grounds for soul-making and indirectly defends God in the face of evil. Hick’s argument is stronger than Johnson’s. I believe that evil exists in order to teach humans virtue that God has created. I also believe, like Hick suggests, that God, the universe, and His creations are inherently good, and that evil comes from the corruption of the good.…
Evil is necessary for people to exist. He does not seem to like the challenging against God--that God should not be questioned. Hick explains that God is responsible for creating the world, but not for how things have gone wrong. In addition, he contradicts the argument that God could have created a wholly good person; to be a wholly good person would take away freedom. If freedom is taken away, then it contradicts what it means to be a human in this world. He goes on to explain the process of soul-making. Hick argues that if there was no evil in the world--there would be no sense of balance. If there was no pain and suffering, then there would be no need for human traits such as courage and kindness. Hick believes that we need the heartache in the world for things to happen as part of God’s…
The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…
P4: Evil is not due to God but to man’s misuse of the free will that God gave him (McCloskey & Hick, 332 &347).…
Here John Wick confronts the classic Christian teaching rejection of evil by introducing Augustine’s theory. Augustine holds the conviction that the universe is inherently good, but if so, where does evil originate? In Augustine’s theory, he suggests that every matter that God creates is in some form of good, however God did not place disorder or distortion of good in the universe. This is what he means that “evil represents the going wrong of something which in itself is good”: while matter is born good, the perception of good varies resulting the outcome of perceived evil. In a social situation, what I perceive as good, others may perceive as off. Every matter is good, until I distort the value of…
For most part, the heaviest question asked throughout this chapter is why evil exists, and why God allowed it to exist. A human being who is probably sick and tired of all the evil and suffering in the world would say that if only evil can just stop existing – if only suffering would stop. If only human beings had no instincts that would push them to do the wrong thing. I used to think this way; why can’t we exist in a world where evil is absent? After reading this chapter and listening to the explanations in class, I realized that evil actually makes way for love. I thought about how it would be much better for evil to exist, than for it to be non-existent but along with it, the absence of love. Several movies have already been made about a utopia – a sort of paradise where everyone is the same and there is only good, but the movie always takes a sour turn and ends up in chaos. I then think about some people who look as if they exist around this concept of evil: hurting other people, not caring about their bodies, swearing off God, thinking they are the masters of their own lives. The thing is, most of the time these people often look happy. Ignorance is bliss, as they say. Sometimes it comes to a point where the temptation kicks on to be much like them. Gladly though, it has never fully consumed me. After much evaluation and some time ‘observing’ these people who seem to be having all the fun in the world, I discovered that their happiness, their so-called love, was fleeting. In a sense, it was not real, it was not true, and it was not pure. A phrase from the chapter then starts to make sense: “What Satan put into the heads of our remote ancestors own as if they had created themselves – be their own masters – invent some sort of happiness for themselves outside…
Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…
In “Why Does God Allow Evil” Richard Swinburne argues that evil exists in the world because of the existence of a good, omnipotent God. His strongest argument is that there is a difference between moral evil and natural evil and each are necessary for the world’s good. Therefore, any wrongdoings by an individual is done with intent through negligence, rather than an act of God. On the other side, in “Karma, Rebirth and the Problem of Evil” Whitley R.P. Kaufman, contends that the problem of evil is constructed around the assumption that there is a God and that is it a universal problem. Karma is not the justification of God for individuals’ wrongdoings, it is because what happened in the former life has a way of punishing you in the present.…