Preview

John Austin's Theory of Law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
377 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Austin's Theory of Law
John Austin (1790-1859) was a British legal philosopher and was the first Professor of Jurisprudence at London University. His publications had a profound influence on English jurisprudence. They include The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832), and Lectures on Jurisprudence. John Austin is best known for his work developing the theory of legal positivism. He attempted to clearly separate moral rules from "positive law." Austin's theory also falls under Constitutions, International Law, non-sanctioned rules, or law that gives rights.

Austin believed that people have different interpretations of what is wrong and right. Therefore, 'set' laws needed to be established that has to be obeyed. There are three aspects of Austin's theory of law - Analytical Jurisprudence, Legal Positivism and Command theory of law and the theory of legal sovereignty.

Analytical Jurisprudence: It is a method of legal study that concentrates on the logical structure of law, the meaning and uses of its concepts, and the formal terms and the modes of its operation. John Austin's particular form of analysis was reductive. He analyzed legal concepts in terms of non-legal concepts so that the entire law could be understood in non-legal terms.

Legal Positivism: In the 19th century, Austin developed legal positivism theory. The legal positivism states, "What is Law?" Is it written?, Where does it come from? Positivism is from Latin 'root-positus', which means to be certain and fixed. Legal positivism states that laws are derived from written rules, regulations which have been enacted, adopted and recognized by a governmental entity or political institution, including administrative, executive, legislative, and judicial bodies. It is based on the legal philosophy that what is the intent of the enacting body.

Command theory of law and the theory of legal sovereignty: This aspect of Austin's theory is based on the commandment of the sovereign. He realized that there should be fixed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. What effect did the United States Supreme Court’s decision have on the Texas statute?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Questions

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. What effect did the United States Supreme Court’s decision have on the Texas statute?…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persons who believe that law is "discovered" by men and women through the use of reasoning and choosing between good and evil, believe in which school of jurisprudential thought?…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beard Vs Commager Analysis

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In White’s view, Progressive legal realism brought “skepticism toward the ideal of a ‘rule of law’ in American culture that transcended and constrained the particularistic attitudes and agendas of legal decision makers.” Beard and other Progressive historians imposed “their modernist preconceptions about history, law, judicial decision making, and constitutional interpretation on events from earlier time periods.” Historian Jonathan Gienapp addresses the historiographical dimension of Beardian thought. But he also rejects the universalism of economic determinism.Beard, he asserts, “remains as vital as…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into the Wild

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages

    16. What appears to be McCandless’ view of federal and state laws, such as trespassing,…

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Midterm Review

    • 2002 Words
    • 15 Pages

    This theory is based on the premise that law derives its status as law from the fact that it has been enacted by the sovereign with the power to enforce his or her wishes.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Positivism- is the thesis that the existence and content of law on social facts and not on its merits.…

    • 2624 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonetheless, this argument was revolutionize, by Hart which followed those of Jeremy Betham and John Austin, not only expanding on the notion of the Sovereign as the ultimate authority of law, but further arguing in his book, The Concept of Law, that law is separate from…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Texas Constitution began with a Bill of Rights. This is another thing that I like about it because unlike the U.S. Constitution it puts the rights of the people first. The Bill of Rights declared that Texas was a free and independent state, subject only to the Constitution of the United States, that all free men have equal rights, and that the writ of habeas corpus could not be suspended or unduly delayed. It forbid religious tests for office, unreasonable searches, and imprisonment for debt. It also guaranteed liberty of speech and press, the right of the accused to obtain bail and to be tried by a jury, and the right of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interestingly, Mayhew did not interpret the famous passage in Romans that “all authority is derived from God” as justifying whatever those in power said. In fact, in Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy, this view is rare. “Law” was just by definition. If it was not just, it was not a law, but an arbitrary decree. This is a time before legal positivism, and therefore, law was quantitative.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theory - The theory of certain immutable rights possessed by all individuals; and that these rights are not granted by the government but rather they're inherent to human nature. That the main purpose of a benevolent government is to secure and protect these rights. Additionally that government is based on the consent of the governed (the people) who are the sole source of this governmental authority. Finally, that should the government persistently violate the principle of a proper and good government, then the people have the right to overthrow it.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the premise that each state is the ultimate source of law within its own boundaries.…

    • 2849 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The theory of natural law originates from Aristotle’s idea of goodness as fitness for purpose and stoic’s concept of a universal law of reason which is in agreement with nature. What we now call human nature. This point is then furthered by Aquinas who agrees with the argument but furthers it by linking it with his Christian belief by saying following this law is equivalent to following the command of God as human nature is in us inbuilt into us from when God created us.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This author focused on the ideals at the time of the creation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and how societal changes forced lawmakers to pass Amendments in order to change with the times. It also touched a little on how expansion of the United States helped to cause this legal change.…

    • 2809 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS A1. The stability and predictability of the law is essential to business activities. ANSWER: T PAGE: NAT: AACSB Analytic B1. 2 TYPE: AICPA Critical Thinking =…

    • 4405 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics