Jennings and Armington

Topics: Crime, Trial, Law Pages: 2 (278 words) Published: November 27, 2012

Marlene Clarke Kaplan University LS 311-02 Business Law Professor Toni Starcher September 12th 2012


Armington, while robbing a drugstore, shot and seriously injured Jennings, a drugstore clerk. Armington was subsequently convicted in a criminal trial of armed robbery, assault and battery. Jennings later brought a civil tort suit against Armington for damages. Armington contended that he could not be tried again for the same crime, as that would constitute double jeopardy, which is prohibited in the Fifth Amendment to the constitution. In this situation, Armington is incorrect about the double jeopardy law and he should accept responsibility for what he did. The Fifth Amendment offers certain protection to the defendant but the law must maintain fairness and consistency. According to the text, the Fifth Amendment does not allow a person to be tried twice for the same crime. In other words, if a person faces trial for a crime and is found not guilty and later on new evidence is discovered to link the person to the crime, they cannot stand trial a second time. Double jeopardy does not prohibit damages entitled to the victim in a civil suit. A civil tort suit occurs when someone has been hurt so the law allows them to seek...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Jennings vs. Armington Essay
  • Essay about Jennings
  • Comparison of Donne and Jennings Poetry Essay
  • Conflict in "The Nest" Paul Jennings Essay
  • Metamorphasis of Michael Jennings Essay
  • Ezra Jennings Character Analysis Essay
  • Essay about MKT571 JAMES J JENNINGS
  • Old Age and Elizabeth Jennings Ponders Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free