Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

James Rachels' Death and Dying

Powerful Essays
1762 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
James Rachels' Death and Dying
James Rachels ' Death and Dying

James Rachels is one of the most controversial philosophers talked about in today 's society. One of his most talked about topics is whether a person has a right to die or not. Not much is known about Rachels expect for the many articles and books he has written. In the controversy of letting a person die or killing him, he does not try to explain which method is good and which method is bad. He however tries to explain why they both are bad to a certain degree.
Rachels does not take one side, but tries to convince why one is better than the other. In his opinion, letting a person starve to death or just putting him out of his misery by killing him is an ongoing struggle. If you let a person starve to death, it might be putting that person through a lot of pain but he 'll still be alive (who knows, maybe a miracle cure will be found.) If you killed him on the spot with a lethal injection, it would be a more peaceful death but you would be shortening that person 's life. Putting a person to death in a peaceful manner is called euthanasia. Euthanasia is an ancient word that means "easy death." There is also the issue of morality. Would killing someone by their own will or suicide be a moral act? What about a patient that is suffering from cancer? Is it moral to let that person suffer? These are some of the many questions people have been trying to answer for year without success. Euthanasia is a very uncomfortable subject to talk about for most people because who wants to think about having to kill oneself or a person that is dear to his or her life. Even though nobody wants to go through the hardship of deciding whether a person should live or die, it happens everyday. There are two forms of euthanasia. There is an active euthanasia and a passive euthanasia
(Jussim 7-13). This so-called distinction between active and passive was challenged by Rachels in a paper first published in 1975 in the New England
Journal of Medicine. In that paper, Rachels challenges both the use and moral significance of that distinction. He argues that active euthanasia is in many cases is more humane than passive euthanasia. Rachels urges doctors to reconsider their views on active euthanasia. He writes: "To begin with a familiar type of situation, a patient who is dying of incurable cancer of the throat is in terrible pain, which can no longer be satisfactorily alleviated.
He is certain to die within a few days even if present treatment is continued, but he does not want to go on living for those days since the pain is unbearable. So he asks the doctor for an end to it, and his family joins in this request
(Rachels 106-108)." "Suppose the doctor agrees to withhold treatment. The justification for his doing so is that the patient is in terrible agony, and since he is going to die anyway, it would be wrong to prolong his suffering needlessly, but now notice this if one simply withholds treatment, it may take the patient longer to die, and so he may suffer more than he would if more direct action were taken and a lethal injection given. This fact provides strong reason for thinking that, once the initial decision not to prolong his agony has been made, active euthanasia is actually preferable to passive euthanasia, rather than the reverse (Rachels 106-108)." Let 's take for example one of my favorites, Baby Jane Doe. She is a baby that was heavily deformed mentally and physically. The doctors said that she doesn 't have a chance to live if she doesn 't go into surgery. However, Baby Jane Doe has a slight chance of living if the surgery is done, but she would most likely live to be 18 years old or less. She would still be mentally retarded and would need constant attention from her parents. So if Baby Jane goes into surgery, it would be the same as passive euthanasia. The parents of Baby Jane decided that it would be better for them and her if she died peacefully rather than suffering through what was sure to be her death in later years. However, the government decided that it was wrong for Baby Jane to die so they were forced to have the surgery done to their child (Rachels 60-62). So is killing someone worse than letting them die passively? Rachels asks us to consider two cases. Let 's take for example a guy named Mike will gain a large inheritance if anything should happen to his young cousin. One evening while the youngster is taking a bath, Mike sneaks into the bathroom and drowns the child, and then arranges things so it will look like an accident. In the second case, a guy named John will gain a large inheritance and plans to drown his cousin, but as he enters the bathroom
John sees the child slip and hit his head and fall face down in the water. John watches and does nothing. Now, Mike killed the child while John let the child die. Now did either man behave better, from a moral point of view? "If the difference between killing and letting die were in itself a morally important matter, one should say that John 's behavior was less reprehensible than Mike 's.
But does one really want to say that (Rachels 131)?" So in the case of Baby
Jane Doe, no one is to say who 's right. In this circumstances, the government was right because Baby Jane Doe is doing a whole lot better than many doctors speculated. Even though the government might have been right about Baby Jane
Doe 's diagnosis, there are many times when their decisions are completely wrong.
I believe that there are some circumstances when euthanasia is the morally correct action. I also understand that there are real concerns about legalizing euthanasia because of fear of misuse or overuse, and the fear of the loss of respect for the value of life. We need to proceed with caution in my opinion.
We need full and open discussion, improvements in research, and above all we need to think about the topic together. Our best approach at this time may be to modify homicide laws to include motivational factors as a legitimate defense.
Just as homicide is acceptable in cases of self-defense, it could be considered acceptable if the motive is mercy. Obviously, strict parameters would have to be established that would include patients ' request and approval, or in the case of incompetent patients such as a person in a vegetable state, advance directives in the form of a living will or family and court approval. Now there lies the question about the law and how euthanasia can be a legal process. Wouldn 't it be wonderful if the government would make as much sense as 'men ' do? All we need is beer, sleep, nachos, and sex. Then we would have no complications whatsoever. However, the law doesn 't work that way. Our governing law works much like a 'women ' does. It 's so controlling even though it says we have freedom, it spends our hard earned money like crazy, and it 's always changing the rules to its liking. For those who believe that euthanasia is immoral may nevertheless hold that it should not be illegal (Rachels 168).
They may reason that if a person wants to die, it is strictly up to them no matter how foolish or immoral their desire may be. However, the American law makes no distinction between euthanasia and murder (Rachels 182). As everybody knows, there are many loop holes in the government, and if you look hard enough you 'll be able to find them. One of the ways that you can get away with euthanasia is by starving yourself to death. Some people might feel that starving themselves to death is an alternative and an ideal euthanasia. Many old people have died this way (Humphry 63). However this is not as easy as it seems because there are many factors you have to consider. In some cases of self-starvation, the dehydration process can be painful and could take up to 40 days. They may also slip in and out of coma. Because of this, the process of self-starvation euthanasia could take a considerable amount of time and should be carefully considered before preceding (Humphry 63-65). A person may ask why this form of euthanasia is legal. It is because there is always a loop hole somewhere in the government 's law system. The law doesn 't permit force feeding so you can 't force someone to eat. Also the law doesn 't permit any medical treatment without the patient 's consent even if their condition threatens their life (Humphry 65). Death is one of the wonders of Life. I 'm sure that everyone sometime or another has thought about what it was like to be in the state of complete unconsciousness or be dead to put it in simpler terms. In an ironic sense, many people may wonder what it would 'feel ' like to be dead. Many doctors and scientists that have spent many years researching this topic and have come to the conclusion that death occurs when a person 's heart stops beating, respiration ceases, and brain activity comes to a halt (Kung and Jens 8-9). It took a genius to figure that one out. Euthanasia can not be completely argued on until someone knows exactly what happens when someone passes on to the other side. David Hume, the great Scottish philosopher of the 18th century, remarked that the aim of philosophy should be to replace superstition and false religion with reason and understanding (Rachels 1). So it is safe to say that euthanasia is neither right or wrong.

Works Cited

Humphry, Derek. Final Exit: The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and
Assisted Suicide for the Dying. Oregon: The Hemlock Society, 1991.

Jussim, Daniel. Euthanasia: The "Right to Die" Issue. New Jersey: Enslow
Publishers Inc., 1993.

Kung, Hans, and Walter Jens. Dying with Dignity: A Plea for Personal
Responsibility. New York: Continuum, 1995.

Landau, Elaine. The Right to Die. New York: Franklin Watts, 1993.

Rachels, James. The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1986.

Cited: Humphry, Derek. Final Exit: The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and Assisted Suicide for the Dying. Oregon: The Hemlock Society, 1991. Jussim, Daniel. Euthanasia: The "Right to Die" Issue. New Jersey: Enslow Publishers Inc., 1993. Kung, Hans, and Walter Jens. Dying with Dignity: A Plea for Personal Responsibility. New York: Continuum, 1995. Landau, Elaine. The Right to Die. New York: Franklin Watts, 1993. Rachels, James. The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Fenigsen, R.. (2011). Other People 's Lives: Reflections on Medicine, Ethics, and Euthanasia. Issues in Law & Medicine, 26(3), 239-279. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Research Library. (Document ID: 2317026301).…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    For instance, euthanasia may be seen as assisted suicide or having the right to choose when a patients’ quality of life is too diminished. Choosing when to withhold life saving treatment is also a very personal choice and opinions about the appropriate time can be extremely diverse from patient to family to friends to healthcare providers. Patients choosing to continue detrimental behaviors and actions, that may have resulted in the terminal illness, can also prove to be frustrating to nurses and family providing support and care.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the practice of mercifully ending a person 's life in order to free someone from a deadly disease. The Greek word “Euthanasia” simply means “good death”. This refers to the intentional ending of a person or animal’s life to relieve suffering and pain. It is also known as “Mercy Killing”. It is a serious ethical and political issue in today’s society because it goes against the norms of traditional medicine. It is so, because some people define euthanasia as a form of suicide. However, some people actually think that it is a choice that concerns the quality of life. In fact, people have different standards regarding the worth of life. Others believe that being clinically alive is enough to say that a person should live, but for others, it is simply inadequate. If a person’s life is lacking in self awareness or intrinsic presence as a human being, due to extreme physical or mental suffering, then that person should be able to choose a dignified death rather than an undignified existence. This is evident because of moral conscience, social bias or pressure, and financial situations. It is portrayed that nurture or environmental factors plays a role that make euthanasia more appealing. In short, some people tend to disregard the moral and ethical values of life when they see a person suffering. Indeed, despite of the moral and ethical issues that contradict the concept of euthanasia, there are certain factors it impacts society positively, which leads it to be more socially acceptable.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    is feasible to take the life of another human being in order to ‘put them out of…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nurses and other medical personnel normally confront ethical dilemmas when caring for terminally ill patients. Correct understanding of the fundamental ethical principles aids the nurses to examine major dilemmas in the delivery of healthcare to the very sick patients or terminally ill patients. Due to a boost in medical knowledge and expertise, so are alternatives for healthcare. These alternatives present intricate moral dilemmas when decisions arise regarding the treatment of dying patients. Majority of the medical personnel are faced with the decisions related to the treatment of dying patients to ease a patient’s final misery. Conceivably, a decision will need to be made about whether to allow a patient to continue living or to end his or her life by terminating treatment when all's said and done. Often, these decisions concerning the care of a dying loved one confront people from all walks of life (Butts and Rich, 2005)…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    intentionally end a patient's life. This could be done with an administering of a lethal…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buddhism in Euthanasia

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Buddhists might also argue that helping to end someone's life is likely to put the helper into a bad mental state, and this too should be avoided.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To illustrate, there is a case where the patient has terminal throat cancer and is in terrible pain that cannot be alleviated with the use of pain medication. The patient along with the immediate family asked the doctor to end their life because he cannot stand to live the rest of his days in unbearable pain. If the doctor chose passive euthanasia and only withheld the treatment from the patient, it could actually prolong his life but he will still suffer in agonizing pain (Rachels, 1975, 79). Since the patient will die in a few days it is inhumane to let the patient suffer when there is an alternative way. If the doctor wants to do what is best for the patient and has given the patient options, the choice is ultimately up to the patient. If the patient wants the lethal drug then it’s their choice, the doctor will have explained all their options and made sure the patient is competent that they know what’s going on. (Rachels, 1975, 80).…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    those who are suffering, and for the matter as a whole in order for assisted suicide to be made a…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Euthanasia, killing would be a justifiable act. According to the article, “They tried all kinds of medications… so not only was she in horrible pain, but she was throwing up all the time” (Thompson). This evidence helps prove that medicine won’t always help people who have been sick for a while, so they will just keep getting worse and worse. The next article states, “The Stratford woman sat helplessly as her beloved mother waged a futile battle against breast cancer that eventually spread to her bones, causing excruciating pain” (Thompson). This verification reveals that a serious disease like cancer is very painful and most people can’t defeat it.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To talk of someone voluntarily taking their own life is still abominable in many societies today. Historically, it was unthinkable and unethical to even consider asking a physician to help one take their own life. It is evident that, with all the advancements in medical technology in our society today, our capabilities to extend the lives of patients suffering from different medical conditions has greatly increased. Because of this, a virtuous person would opt to…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    a very hard topic. It is as a human being you want to go with a slow peaceful death, not a…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are other matters like money and fame that lure and attract people to the path of death. Money and fame are one of those issues that every man longs…

    • 565 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most assisted suicides take place in the patients home. It is comforting to the patient's family and the patient because it is a sense of piece to them. If the patient is in the hospital he or she is probably not where they want to die at. Assisted suicide normally takes about five minutes for the patient to slip into a coma and to never wake up. The cheapest form comes in pills that are very bitter and have to be busted open and mixed with applesauce or water (Engber).…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine a person who is in between the boundaries of life and death and is suffering extreme pain. What could be more humane than to put to rest that person? Keeping him alive while he is in extreme pain will not make his life livable. How can life be…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics