One suspects that this is almost unavoidable, in a society where to raise the need for one national language, say “Filipino” (as mandated by the Constitution) is certain to arouse immediate opposition. Or, if not immediately, it is deferred and sublimated into other pretexts for debate and argumentation. Fortunately, we have not reached the point of armed skirmishes and violent confrontations for the sake of our mother/father tongue, as in India and other countries. My partisanship for Filipino (not Tagalog) is bound to inflame Cebuanos, Bicolanos, Ilocanos, and so on, including Filipino speakers-writers of English, or Filipino English. We probably try to defuse any brewing conflict quickly by using the colonizer’s tongue, or compromise babel-wise. My view is that only a continuing historical analysis can help explain the present contradictory conjuncture, and disclose the options it... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2012, 03). Isyu Sa Wikang Filipino. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 03, 2012, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Isyu-Sa-Wikang-Filipino-945531.html
"Isyu Sa Wikang Filipino" StudyMode.com. 03 2012. 2012. 03 2012 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Isyu-Sa-Wikang-Filipino-945531.html>.
- MLA 7
"Isyu Sa Wikang Filipino." StudyMode.com. StudyMode.com, 03 2012. Web. 03 2012. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Isyu-Sa-Wikang-Filipino-945531.html>.
"Isyu Sa Wikang Filipino." StudyMode.com. 03, 2012. Accessed 03, 2012. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Isyu-Sa-Wikang-Filipino-945531.html.