Preview

Is Whistle-Blowing Good for an Organization or Not?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1133 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Whistle-Blowing Good for an Organization or Not?
Is Whistle-blowing Good for an Organization or Not?

This paper will explore whistle-blowing by giving a definition, a brief history of a couple of famous whistle-blowers, and how whistle-blowers have a positive effect in today’s business.

Origins of the Whistle-blower:

“The term whistleblower derives from the practice of English Bobbies (police officers) who would blow their whistle when they noticed the commission of a crime. The blowing of the whistle would alert both law enforcement officers and the general public of danger”. (wikipedia)

In more modern terms related to the business world, a whistleblower is an employee, former employee, of a business or government agency, who reports misconduct to people or entities that have the power and presumed willingness to take corrective action. (wikipedia) Generally, the wrongdoing is a violation of a law, a rule, a regulation, and/or a direct threat to public or shareholders. The whistle-blowing report may include; fraud, health or safety violations, corruption, or lack of concern for the law.

Brief History

Attitudes toward whistle-blowing have evolved considerably during the past 50 years in corporate America, from the early days of the "company man", where loyalty to the company was the norm, to the present time when public outrage about corporate misconduct has created a more positive climate for whistle-blowing.

Persons who blow the whistle generally do so out of a sense of public duty arising from high personal moral standard and the need to maintain professional integrity and standards. Because of the high personal risk attached to whistle-blowing, reporting is not taken lightly as whistle-blowers become vulnerable to unfavorable actions being taken against them by way of retaliation.

Prior to the 1960s, corporations had broad employee policies and could fire an employee at will. Employees were expected to be loyal to their organizations at all costs. Among the few exceptions to this



References: Frontline With PBS. (n.d.). Retrieved January, 2008, from Karen Silkwood Web site: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/interact/silkwood.html Injuries, V. (n.d.). Lieff, Cabraser, Helmann, & Bernstein. Retrieved January 27, 2008, from Bridgestone/Firestone Tire Recall Web site: http://www.vehicle-injuries.com/firestone-tire-recall.htm?gclid=CJDR3o6Ll5ECFScXagodTir7OQ Miethe, T. Whistle-blowing at Work. Unknown. (n.d.). History of Asbestos News. Retrieved January 26, 2008, from Legal Help Center Web site: http://www.legalhelpcenters.com/History-Of-Asbestos-Lawyer_279.html Unknown. (n.d.). Whistle-blowing. Retrieved January 27, 2008, from Wikipedia Web site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblowing Wigand, J. (n.d.). Dr Jeffrey Wigand. Retrieved January 27, 2008, from Dr Jeffrey Wigand Web site: http://www.jeffreywigand.com/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This incident Challenger present us a case study in organizational communication, ethics and culture as it promotes or discourages necessary communication and the ethics of whistle blowing.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to DeGeorge, for whistle-blowing to be considered ethical there first must be a serious harm that the whistle-blowing aims to prevent, which is greater than the harm it causes the firm and stakeholders. In this case, the corrupt activities are very serious and would have posed a greater harm going undetected than the negative media attention and charges brought against the firm. DeGeorge’s second condition states that the whistle-blower is required to first attempt to prevent…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA’s Edward Snowden, FBI’s Mark Felt, White House Staffer Linda Tripp, Kerr-McGee’s Karen Silkwood and Sherron Watkins of Enron are all on the same list of famous whistleblowers. All of these people have become famous because they provided information with the sole purpose of revealing wrongdoings by someone or a company. Some believe whistleblowers are traitors and should be punished: while others believe they are heroes and should be honored. Whistleblowers are being acknowledged as a great threat to companies and managers are realizing that they need to know who they are and what they will do if their company is faced with this situation.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chap 21 outline law

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    F. Whistleblowing-occurs when an employee tells government authorities, upper-level managers, or the media that her or his employer is engaged in some unsafe or illegal activity.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A worker being fired for actions ranging from filing a workers’ compensation claim to reporting safety violations to government agencies is called…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct 573 Week 1 Homework

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whistleblowers are the main ones that expose white-collar crimes in contemporary society. Whistleblowers are the ones that let the authorities and the public that another person is being involved in illegal activities occurring in the work place. Illegal activities can include fraud, violations of rules, laws, and or procedures. A whistleblower may tell someone within his or her organization or someone in law enforcement. In order to be a whistleblower according to federal authorities, the…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whistle blowing does not violate company’s loyalty because they comapny is lying to themselves, employees, and consumers. Bok argues that whistle blowing does violates company loyalty while Larmer argues that whistle blowing does not violate company’s loyalty. This paper support Larmer’s argument with examples, research, and laws.…

    • 47 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the nineteenth century a legal rule was developed giving employer’s unfettered power to “dismiss their employees at will for good cause, for no cause or for cause morally wrong, without being thereby guilty of a legal wrong.” (Halbert, 2012, p. 49). This legal rule is commonly known as Employment-At-Will and ultimately the employer has the rights to sever the employer-employee relationship at any given time for any given reason and whether or not the employee thinks wrongful separation. It is a topic that is debated for many years and in today’s current economy and unemployment rate steadily increasing “Employment-at-will” is a doctrine that is being used more frequently as employers experience their present day lows. Employers however have to keep in mind the other that in 1960, federal civil rights laws created remedies against employers who fire workers because of their race, national origin, color, religion, sex, age, or disability (Halbert, 2012, p. 49). Later, in 1970s and 1980s, federal and state statutes include protection from retaliation for employees who report violations of environmental or workplace safety laws and those individuals are commonly known as “whistleblowers”. In essence, whistle blowers are typically long term, highly loyal employees who feel strongly that their company should do the right thing, because in the wave of scandal with major firms such as Enron and World.Com; Congress enacted corporate fraud reform legislation which provides provisions to protect those who report financial misconduct in publicly traded companies. This law is known as Sarbanes-Oxey, or SOX (Halbert, 2012, p. 50).…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whistle blowing is also one of the ethical issues users can use and relate to. This is when an…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doing what’s right is never an easy decision one when it comes to work. However, when it comes to whistleblowing, this may be the hardest choice that someone will ever have to make in their life. Handling a whistleblower claim means dealing with the possibility that repercussions may come in the terms of unemployment, drop of income, loss of friendships, and reputation. The choice of a whistleblower can be impossible to make, in terms, of how they are going to bring to higher authorities.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mike Rich

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The whistleblower poses no single entity, whether it being a single person or a business as a whole, to count itself immune to the dangers of corruption or malfeasance. Those who blow the whistle can neither risk the silencing of themselves for reasons of concrete evidence that question the proper moral and ethical interests of the public eye. According to Sissela Bok, “’Whistleblowing’ is a new label generated by our increased awareness of ethical conflicts encountered at work. Whistleblowers sound an alarm from within the very organization in which they work, aiming to spotlight neglect or abuses that threaten the public interest.” Take Frank Serpico, for example, a man whom was willing to risk his life, yet alone his career, to sound the alarm on the corruption within the very organization for which he worked for, the New York Police Department. Here in my discussion, we will examine and discuss Serpico’s case in correlation to the points made by Sissela Bok’s discussion on whistleblowing.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CU235P

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Whistle blowing policy in my workplace makes it clear to me and to staff that it is staff’s responsibility to report improper…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Hutson (2014), “It is generally accepted that there are two types of whistle-blowing: internal and external. Internal whistle-blowing typically involves reporting concerns up the chain of command within the organization in the hope that whatever the problem is, it will be resolved. External whistle-blowing involves reporting concerns outside the organization and in particular, the media” (p. 251).…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inequalities in Nursing

    • 5724 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Rothschild, J and Miethe, T.D (1999) Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation, Work and Occupations, 26 (1), 107-128.…

    • 5724 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Raybeck, 2010) This misconduct can be in the form of: a violation of any law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement or waste of funds; abuse of authority within the workplace; as well as specific danger to public health and safety. Whistleblowers can be employees, suppliers, contractors, clients or any individual who somehow becomes aware of illegal activities taking place in a business either through witnessing the behavior or being told about it. They may hold a position that will enable them to know exact what type of wrongdoing has occurred within an organization. They can remain report wrong doing confidentially; however, they are able to attend any proceedings related to the…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics