Preview

Is Nuclear Power Generation Friendly to Our Environment?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Nuclear Power Generation Friendly to Our Environment?
Our planet, Earth is in crisis! The glaciers are melting, the oceans are rising and the weather system seems out of control. Are we killing our planet? Are we causing global warming by burning fossil fuels for power generation? In 1821 Michael Faraday invented the first electric motor (Bellis). Since that time, man’s appetite for electrical power has grown exponentially. World population growth, and developing nations determined to be more modern are consuming natural and electrical resources at an ever growing pace, we are putting a strain on our ecosystem that may be harming the planet’s environment beyond repair. Electrical power can be generated many ways, Coal, Natural Gas, Hydro Dams, Oil, Solar, Wind, and Nuclear are the major options. All of these choices have advantages and disadvantages regarding the impact to our environment. Considering all of the options for generating power and the implications to our environment, nuclear power may be the safe, environmentally friendly, responsible way to power our future. In 1938 a discovery was made called fission, the nucleus of a uranium atom was split by a neutron generating more than 100 million times the energy released in any chemical reaction. This discovery was made by two German scientists, Otto Hahn and Fritz Straussman.
Letourneau_R Page 2
Unfortunately the first use of nuclear energy was not for power generation, or any other peaceful venture, it was used in the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima (Metcalf 19). Over 15 years later in 1953, Congress passed amendments to the Atomic Energy Act, which allowed for the commercial development of electric power generation using nuclear power. Within one year the United States government built and started generating power from a nuclear reactor. Arco, Idaho was the first town in the United States with its electrical requirements generated by nuclear power. During the next 24 years almost three nuclear power plants were built per year



Cited: Baird, Stephen L. "A GLOBAL NEED, a GLOBAL RESOURCE NUCLEAR POWER AND THE NEW MILLENNIUM." The Technology Teacher 1 Oct. 2004: 21. ELibrary. Moses Greely Library, Dracut. 04 July 2008. Keyword: Nuclear Power. Bellis, Mary Cravens, Gwyneth. Power to Save the World. New York: Alphred a. Knopf, 2007. 1-30. Gray, Paul E KEMENY, LESLIE. "Nuclear Powers Climate Hope." Canberra Times (Australia) 28 Jan. 2008, Final ed., sec. A: 19. Lexis Nexis. CQ Researcher. Middlesex Community College, Dracut. 7 July 2008. McWILLIAMS, DAVID Metcalf, Tom And Gena. Fueling the Future Nuclear Power. Farmington Mills: Greenhaven P, 2007. 17-98. Murawski, John Taylor, John J. "The Nuclear Power Bargain." Issues in Science and Technology 1 Apr. 2004: 41. "U.S Walker, J Samuel. A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective Three Mile Island. Berkley and Los Angeles California: The University of California P, 2004. 71-209. Wilson, Robert

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As a society grows and develops, there are many issues the people must face during the process. One of the most important problems modern civilizations must solve is where and how they get their energy. In our day and age, we rely heavily on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil. Patrick Moore, a writer for the Washington Post, composes an argument for nuclear power and recommends that it should be the future for all things energy. Moore’s argument is a convincing article that would most likely pull many neutral readers to see his side very clearly. The article gives all the pros to the uses of nuclear energy, and does an excellent job of addressing all possible counter-arguments.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Todd H. Otis, A Review Of Nuclear Energy in the United States: Hidden Power, (New York, NY: Praeger Publishers,…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's world where technology and advancements has flourished, majority comes to one main source to run on… Energy. There is several alternative methods on producing energy, some more efficient or safer than others. The most common and traditional source of energy in today's world is coal power, but other alternatives do exist such as that of natural gas, solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is the 3rd most common source of our energy. Nuclear energy was first introduced in 1954 in Russia with the first power plant. Nuclear energy provides about 20% of today's electricity and does provide a substantial amount of energy, but does provide threats of radioactivity.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hansen, James, Ph.D. "4th Generation Nuclear Power." Ossfoundation.us. OSS Foundation, 18 Jan. 2009. Web. 02 Sept. 2013.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mariotte, Michael. “Second Thoughts on Nuclear Power.” Futurist Nov. 2009: 23. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2009. <http://search.ebscohost.com/‌login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=44523422&site=ehost-live>.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paul L. Joskow & John E. Parsons. “The Future of Nuclear Power After Fukushima”. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. (2012): 1-30.…

    • 3083 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a result of the current global warming issues and the ever growing scarcity of our current energy resources we may be forced to resort to nuclear energy. The Department of Energy has already given its support to energy companies who have decided to construct nuclear power plants. It appears that nuclear power is the right course to take, but before this decision is finalised it is important to weigh the multiple advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power. There are many pros and cons, but they weigh up almost equally which makes it a hard decision to choose the right course of action, nuclear power or non-nuclear power.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    living wastes known to man. The technology to safely dispose of this waste has yet to…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Miming Industry

    • 3184 Words
    • 13 Pages

    MIT. (2009, September 17). The Coming Nuclear Crisis. Retrieved May 12, 2011, from Technology Review: http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24414/…

    • 3184 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an era of untold gasoline prices and frequent political dialogue about finding and using alternative forms of energy. Some of these alternative energy sources that are being bantered about and, in some places, implemented include solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. The majority of Americans would agree that all of these forms of alternative energy are safe and should be pursued as new means of powering the country. However, there is one well-known energy source that stirs up dissent and division among the country’s citizens: nuclear power.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is Nuclear Energy Safe

    • 3019 Words
    • 13 Pages

    EPA,. “Nuclear Energy.” Environmental Protection Agency. Print As-Is, 17 10 2012. Web. 4 Mar 2013. <http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-and-you/affect/nuclear.html>.…

    • 3019 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays