Research Paper One
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has been filtering out information from its people for many years. The Government of china takes special restrictions for blocking out what “they” say is safe for their people to read. The PRC takes extreme measures to block out keywords for the freedom of china and even the Urumqi riots back in 2009. So one could see were hiring a third party could come in as a scapegoat, or simple add to the already massive filter system put into place right now. The PRC is a communist country that has a certain set laws that the entire population must follow. Things from what religion, to clothes, to even what kind of car they can drive. With implications like this, one can only imagine what kind of a blocking protocol that would ensue. China has blocked and filtered more than any other country in the world and does so at no secret to anyone. The Chinese government uses many different forms of blocking protocol including DNS redirection, keyword filtering, web server IP address, and DNS server IP address. The websites themselves such as www.yahoo.com, www.altavista.com, and www.google.com where asked by the government to impose certain regulations with their search engines to aide in filtering out banned content. Some arguments say that these companies themselves should not have to pre-filter out their sites. That it is taking a biased view when agreeing to this kind of stance in helping out a communist country. But others simple state that it only helps in the long wrong and the money is probably nice too. Google is one of the few companies that have severed their ties with china and moved stopped self-censoring its search engine. Google stated that the reason for severing its ties happened when an internet hack occurred that originated for china. The PRC also blocks social network and notable news sites in order to keep only what they want in their country allowed. Now setting in place filter from my company would help the government keep their control over what content gets filtered in and out of their firewalls. That it could help safe guard information that the PRC deems unsafe and threatens national security. It would also censor negative comments against the government and protect a revolution. In a way it could also prevent crimes by limiting the negative and disturbing things the population can view. Putting a filter designed by a private company could come at a cost though. The people of the nation would have their information come at a minimum and they would only get a biased view of the world. Also in keeping up with protecting national security it wouldn’t help the company’s reputation if something went bad. Say for example the Geneva Convention passed a law saying that filtering out information for one’s personal gain was illegal. Then the ramifications would come back on the said company for participating in such an activity. In another stand point, the population could possible turn against the company. They could boycott any of their products and slander their name. Also, people should have a more broaden sense of view about the world, not just what a government and its protocols want it to know. Activists have been fighting for years to free the world and give everyone knowledge. If word was to get out that the filter was in place by another company then it would ruin itself to the ground. Ethically there are two sides to the story here, the government and the people themselves. As the world is ever changing and people become more and more vocal, it becomes more of a challenge for the country to stop everything. Some would argue that no filtering should be in place and that all information should be know, regardless of what harm may or may not come from the information itself becoming exposed. While others, mostly the government, argue that necessary steps need to be in place in order to safe guard the people. The...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document