Before the Civil War, America developed a Manifest Destiny that, in part, meant the expansion of the original thirteen colonies into a great nation. This meant expanding from the original borders past the Mississippi River toward the Pacific Ocean. As that Manifest Destiny was being fulfilled after the Civil War ended, a new Manifest Destiny had been conceived by the U.S. Congress. This new Manifest Destiny began a new period of expansion beyond the boundaries of the continental United States, which gave rise to the Imperialist ideals, having the United States in direct competition with England, France, Germany and Spain for the more underdeveloped countries globally. In this paper, I will summarize the United States’ involvement in international affairs during the late 19th century, explaining the extent to which American involvement in international affairs affected global politics.…
The source presented talks about the Canadian government’s upcoming actions as it deals with the country’s economic affairs. It can be inferred that the author feels that economic prosperity is the most important sign of progress and a good quality of life for Canadians, as jobs and economic growth can lead to “long-term prosperity” that will benefit every citizen of the country. An example of this envisioned economic prosperity is the Harper government’s economic action plan, which seeks to supply more jobs in order to prolong and strengthen Canada’s performance economically. By saying that costs must be reduced or eliminated in international affairs, it can be assumed that the author favours nationalism over internationalism. The speaker’s stance can then be assumed that he or she would most prefer to have their country reap the most benefits through the improvement of economic budgeting, over being a world citizen who cares more for the welfare of the world as a whole, and can be inferred that their position supports unilateralism, wherein a country’s decisions are made by themselves, without international influence. An example of favouring nationalism over internationalism is the recent backing out of Canada from its military participation in Afghanistan, due to its expensive costs. This example shows the challenge between balancing both nationalism and internationalism, as Canada’s purpose of providing military aid to Afghanistan shows that the country seeks to be of help during international crises, but then its withdrawal shows that as much as Canada seeks to aid Afghanistan, it has to prioritize its own welfare first in order to keep giving help. The speaker’s sentiment in the last sentence shows exactly that the programs and benefits must be beneficial to Canadians, not in international affairs where they feel that giving our resources only hinders Canada’s path to economic prosperity. Some would agree with the source, as Canada’s…
"Nationalism is an infantile disease, the measles of mankind." [Albert Einstein] Nationalism, to a far extent, can eat away and setback mankind, like a disease. When asked should either nationalism or internationalism be promoted in society, the following questions must be answered: How does a nation handle conflict? Are peoples subjugated? What are the consequences of nations being overly dependant on others? The answers to these questions are the driving force behind the ideologies of Internationalism and Nationalism. Internationalism is a focus on betterment of oneself while benefiting the world, and stresses cooperation and teamwork. Positives of internationalism include improved aid and development throughout the world, increased cooperation though collective security as well as increased growth through economic alliances. Conversely, internationalism can include a loss of sovereignty and independence that signals a turning away from self-sufficiency. International agreements may not always be honored, and it may leave a nation without the mutual defense it had counted upon. On the other side of the continuum lies nationalism, a belief that prioritizes one's nation over others, while other nations may benefit, it is indirect, unlike internationalism. Nationalism creates a unified society with one national identity, and leads to patriotism that can be brought about by a strong military presence. Nationalism stresses the importance of remaining independent and sovereign, but nations that discourage trade with other nations through tariffs can suffer economically. Also nationalistic territorial expansion tends to ignore the cultural needs of other nations, and this can lead to the subjugation of a cultural group. Upon analysis, this remains a complex issue, but the best way to cooperate between nations stems from effective use of internationalism. With internationalism, free trade can directly benefit a nations economy, and diplomatic negotiations before action…
The business world is becoming increasingly global. As a result of this, many companies, such as Costa Coffee and Dyson, have changed their strategies in relation to the markets they target or where they produce. Does the increasingly global nature of business mean that all organisations need to change their strategies significantly to achieve higher profits? Justify your answer with reference to Costa Coffee, Dyson and/or other organisations that you know.…
Isolationism refers to America's longstanding reluctance to become involved in European alliances and wars. But American isolationism did not mean disengagement from the world stage. Brought up with the question if America can remain isolationist, the answer is no. Here are some reasons why.…
The United States declining to give aid to Hungarian Patriots in 1849 was an example of isolationism. Isolationism is the belief to remain apart from the affairs of another country. The U.S. did not want any conflict with other countries. The United States would not support Hungry and their fight for independence. The only involvement that the United States had in this conflict was freeing Hungarian leaders out of prison.…
Before World War II, the United States had a policy of isolationism, where they did not want to interfere in the affairs of any other country. Instead, Americans chose to work on domestic problems like the Great Depression, while foreign countries in Europe and Asia started to give rise to fascist dictators. Members of the America First Committee, like Charles Lindbergh (refer to doc. F) wanted to keep the US from intervening in these countries. However, public opinion started to change more and more as problems in Europe and Asia rose. Starting in the 1930s, the United States was forced into rejecting isolationism and heading to war instead due to economic, political, and social reasons. The US was in a depression and businesses saw a market in war supplies. As dictatorships rose in Europe, Roosevelt felt the need to intervene. Public opinion started to sway as Americans learned of innocents affected by the war.…
The Spanish American War which occurred in 1898 was a conflict between the United States and Spain that had ended Spanish colonial rule in the Americas. It also resulted in the United States acquiring territories in Latin America and in the western Pacific. The war originated in Cuba where people struggled for independence from Spain in February 1895. Spain’s cruel measures to stop the rebellion were graphically showed off for the United States public by several over dramatic newspapers and American sympathy for the rebels started to rise. The increase in popular demand for United States intervention became an frazzling event after the unexplained sinking in Havana harbor of the battleship USS Maine on Feb. 15, 1898, which was sent to protect United States citizens and property after the anti-Spanish rioting in Havana.…
Which agency oversees the foreign policy establishment, irons out the differences among the key players in foreign policy, and integrates their members’ positions in order to help the president make his foreign policy? National Security Council…
To what extent should internationalism be pursued, this is one of the most controversial questions of our government and the world today. Internationalism should be pursued to the fullest extent for many different reasons, some of them being fair spread of economic wealth around the world and to prevent wars over governmental issues like communism and democracy. Some people argue against internationalism, their argument being certain parts of the world are being used for outsourcing, but we will argue why that is not a valid point.…
Currently in international circles there is a great debate over globalisation and whether it is a force for good or bad. The statement oversimplifies the matter, of course. But the issue of globalisation and our collective response to it promises to define who prospers and who does not well into the 21st century.…
International relations helps better explain the relationships between states (for example, why the UK and the USA have such a close coalition) and explains why there is international interdependence, as in why member states of the UN have to accept decisions that don’t necessarily facilitate their own needs. International relations explain the governmental systems of dominance and dependence that can help, and hinder countries in their decision-making (e.g. Capitalism, Imperialism and communism). International relations explains more than just the actions of individual and collective states, it also explains the actions of governmental and non-governmental groups, such as terrorist organizations, guerilla militia groups and Green Peace. The I.R theory exists solely to help us understand the world and guide policy decisions. Different theories of I.R. can help provide different perspectives of world events.…
There are many organizations than promote internationalism; two of them are the United Nations and the World Trade Organization. Both of these organizations help promote internationalism, but in different ways. The World Trade Organization is an international non-governmental organization that promotes fair trade between countries. One important aspect of internationalism is that it encourages people all over the world to interact and become more involved in one another's culture. Although the World Trade Organization has been criticized for the way it allows wealthy countries control the system, it still consistently negotiates equal trade for countries that need it, ultimately supporting and promoting internationalism. When it comes to trade,…
I am writing today to inform you about Globalism. I will begin with . “In 1962, the Canadian communications theorist Marshall McLuhan predicted the electronic transformation of the planet earth into a “global village”. In the global village, communication between geographically remote parts of the world would be almost instantaneous, and every important new development—technological, ecological, political, economic, and intellectual—would affect every villager to some degree. Social and geographic mobility, receptivity to change, and a sense of collectivity would be the hallmarks of this new world community. Over the past four decades, McLuhan’s futuristic vision has become a reality” (Fiero). Through the decades art has been such a great form of expression for all, from the people who create, to the people who just like to look or collect. Art has also gone through such an incredible form of change. When I think of art I think of Vincent Van Gogh, Pablo Picasso, Salvador Dali, Donatello, ect. These are the most prominent artists of the last thousand years. But now there is so much more that people can do with art because of modern technology as well as the freedom of expression that, in my opinion, has made artists in this century a little more creative. “While accelerated by electronic technology, it owes much to a broad array of late twentieth-century developments: the success of anticolonial movements, the fall of the Berlin Wall and subsequent collapse of Soviet communism, and the end of the cold war. With the elimination of these obstacles to freedom of communication among the populations of the earth, global cultural integration became a possibility, than a reality” (Fiero).…
The Logic of Internationalism: Coercion and Accommodation by Kjell Goldmann approaches international relations from a completely different perspective. Goldman argues throughout the book that the key to the success of mankind can rely solely on the idea of internationalism. Internationalism is the increase in cooperation between nations in many aspects of a relationship. These may include economics, institution building and any further cooperation leading towards peace between the two nations. He believes that interaction and institutions are related to peace and security and therefore should be examined. Many believe that internationalism cannot be achieved and is unrealistic due to the fact that international relations…