This disillusionment of rational religious terrorism in this conflict must begin with an expanded discussion of rational versus irrational terrorism. As previously stated, rational terrorism involves using violence against civilians as a clear means to an end. Irrational terrorism is the use of violence against civilians for no clear end. Irrational terrorism can include violence for the sake of enjoyment, to gain publicity, etc. Religious fundamentalism is not a rational justification of terrorism in this conflict. A clear and concise understanding of the religion the two sides use as a plausible sympathetic defense for terrorism actually leads to an irrational classification of its use and delegitimizes justification of civilian violence. The only rational justification for terrorism is the strictly politically motivated territorial dispute over the land both the Arabs and the Israelis inhabit. This point will be examined more closely in the analysis that follows.
Also relevant to this discussion is a brief historical analysis of the two countries’ beginning. Much of the religious justification of terrorism comes from the fundamentalist belief of both parties that they have a divine right to the land now called Israel. In the book of Kings God tells the people that the Kingdom of Israel would belong to David and his descendants forever, as they were God’s chosen people-use actual source. At first glance this seems to support a rational religious justification for the use of terrorism to expel the arabs from their divinely promised land. However, this is not the context in which the territorial conflict came about. In the 1930’s, European Jews were facing increased discrimination and persecution for their religious beliefs, and pressured Great Britain to form a Jewish State out of colonial Palestine. The nation state of Israel is formed in 1939, followed by a mass emigration of Jews from Europe to the old Palestine. The Jews thought their immigration would cause the Arabs to immigrate into the surrounding Muslim countries to make room for their new population. Unfortunately for the Jews, the Arabs also felt they had a divinely inspired claim to the land. Source entry. This is where both sides forge claims of rational religious terrorism: Israel via the Zionist movement, and the Arabs via their resistance to expulsion.
The Zionist movement refers to the “retaking” of their homeland through whatever means necessary. Zionists hide behind the illusion of a religiously mandated return to the promised land to justify their uses of terrorism. When the Arabs refused to immigrate out of the land they had been living in for years, the Zionists felt they had the right to use any means necessary in order to achieve the end goal of a Jewish state because it was divinely mandated end, implying that the means used to accomplish this goal also were divinely justified and acceptable. Evidence for this is found within the biblical accounts of the Holy Land, where God leads the Israelites into battle and emerges victorious with them because it is his will that they settle in that land. Source entry. Terrorism, or the use of instilling fear amongst a group of civilians, seemed to be the most rational choice. Fear would cause the Palestinians to leave, giving the Jews their own homeland for once. This justification is fabricated from the “true religion” (what it actually is) in order to fit a rational definition that would endear itself to sympathizers. The fact is thought that the Israelites have no rational religious justification for terrorism. The ten commandments mandates that “Thou Shalt not Kill” source. The Jews lose their homeland to the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Romans and a whole mess of other civilizations. The claim that God gave them this land is completely a radicalized reading of the text implying that they have a divine mission to complete this return home, which is not supported in any reading of the texts when examined closely. Understanding this, the Jewish justification of divinely inspired violence holds no merit. It was an excuse to distract the public from the purely political motivations behind the terrorism. The terrorism was not used to preach the name of God and instill the fear of God, which was the purpose of slaughtering and destruction in the Book of Joshua. Source entry The purpose of this terrorism is to hurt people for the sake of territory. God has no stake in the land gains of either side, but the politicians do, which is why they hide behind His “holy word.” Therefore, because the religious ideology is flawed and the use of violence based on that flawed ideology is not justified, the terrorism loses any religious rationale and becomes solely a rational political technique. Based on the earlier definiton of rational terrorism, there is no longer a religious end justifying terrorism as its means. There is no divinely mandated Jewish state guaranteed to the Jews. That is the basis of their religious argument, which can be concluded to be an irrational form of terrorism. Continued use of this religious premise will have serious consequences for the Jewish community in the future if they do not move away from their irrational ideology and at least acknowledge one that is rational, such as the political dispute involving the territory. Whether or not violence is ever justified, a rational approach to it is easier to understand that basing violence on completely irrational facts or feelings because it loses legitimacy and takes the form of cruelty and abuse, which is not good for public support and sympathy. The Muslims of Palestine also hide behind the religious guise in order to support their continued use of violence. Granted, the Arabs were the initial victim in this conflict, having their established homeland given away by a country in a different continent to a foreign group of people. This concept of Jews being foreign is yet again more evidence to the fact that their takeover of colonial Palestine was purely political. The Arabs almost had no choice but to fight religion with religion. However, fighting religion by also claiming divine providence gives substance to whatever the conflict is. Even though they were forced into this conflict, they did not have to validate their actions by means of religion. Just because the Jewish immigrants decided to justify themselves through a completely radical and incorrect reading of the biblical texts in order to achieve an illusioned rationality, the Arabs were not under the same pressure. The Palestinians could have operated solely from a political perspective, retaliating under the political context instead of a religious one. Instead however, they chose to counter the publicity of Judaism with the relatively unknown Islam through globalized acts of violence. The taking of hostages at the 1972 Olympics in Munich, source, and the hijackings of the planes in Jordan, source, brought national attention to the conflict at hand, Muslims versus the Jews. However, this is the wrong conflict that needed to be brought to attention. It is not the religious conflict between the Jews and muslims but a political conflict between the arabs and the jewish people. The Muslims decided to globalize the conflict through the religious context, one that didn’t exist. The only reason for the conflict was an invasion by a foreign group of people resulting in a territorial dispute. It is the same thing as saying that World War II was a religious conflict because it took place between Catholics and Protestants, which is clearly not the cause of the war. The only difference is that both these religions have broadcasted it so forcefully religious that the media and mass population do not question it. This failure to question has let the lie go on without any reason for it to stop. Without religion as a justification, new members are not as easily persuaded to join. Continue along the line of recruitment, ideology, morale, fervor, cause.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
There are many different definitions of domestic terrorism. However, I define domestic terrorism as physical violence, actual or threatened, against an organization to create fear in order to effect some kind of political and or social change within the United States. Unlike international terrorism, domestic terrorism is usually carried out by local citizens who have become offended or feel threaten or believe they have or will be mistreated by organizations within their own society (government and religious structures). There are two specific types of domestic terrorism. They are "terrorism from above" and "terrorism from below"…
- 365 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Palestine, or is it Israel? Either way, it is a highly contested land between two major Semitic groups: the Arabs, and the Hebrews. From the late 19th century, and throughout the 20th century it has been the focal point of Arab nationalism and Jewish Zionism. Today, it has become the Jewish state of Israel with occupied Palestinian Territories called the West Bank, which lies on the West side of the Jordan River, and the Gaza Strip, which borders Israel and Egypt. But, should the Palestinians deserve a state of their own? This essay will investigate the Palestinian side of the argument, their Biblical and Quranic ties to the land, the State of Palestine should have been created under Jordanian Egyptian as well as Israeli occupation of the land, and finally Israel’s poor relations with Palestine and colonial occupation of the land has led to the formation of many radical groups.…
- 2176 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
Ellingsen, T. (2005). Toward a Revival of Religion and Religious Clashes? Terrorism and Political Violence. Retrieved July 30, 2009, from EBSCOhost doi: 10.1080/09546550590929192. (University Library).…
- 948 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Many of these will be incidents that are examples of the horrors of that day that Lance talks about. His experiences in law enforcement have taught me countless lessons and shown me how many people out there will follow through with violence when they don’t get their way. Though he is always strictly guarded with the confidences of his profession, he has always given me with a firsthand show of the impact that domestic terrorism has on the citizens and law enforcement. I learn the details of some of these incidents without the media’s exaggerations. Some of these facts are not known widely about the infamous bombings. These impacts include the monetary damages that terrorism inflicts, along with the injuries and mental trauma to the victims…
- 778 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Terrorists may be left or right wing, from any religious background or any race. This is what makes identifying these groups of people very difficult. While law enforcement would like to say that a typical terrorist is a young, affluent, white male, for example, it is impossible to make that distinction. There is no profile that would fit terrorists in their entirety. It is possible for a terrorist from a certain group to fit a certain profile. A white supremacist group would have a certain type of person as a member. A black militant group would have a totally different type of person. With this being the case, it is important to identify the group of people rather than the individual. Some groups focus on a single issue such as anti-nuclear power or anti-fur trade while others call for greater…
- 2686 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
September 11th, 2001 was one of the most disconsolate days in the history of the United States. Around 9:00 A.M., American Airlines Flight 11 slammed into the north tower of the World Trade Center, and United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into another tower after twenty minutes. About one hour later, another airplane, American Airlines Flight 77, hit the Pentagon, and United Airlines Flight 93 crashed into a field in Pennsylvania (Schmemann). Due to these attacks, all passengers died in the air crashes, and hundreds of people were killed because they didn’t escape from the Twin Towers before collapsing. This series of malicious attacks not only killed 2,947 people, but also left thousands of people suffering in sorrow ("Sept. 11: A Day for Remembering"). It is well known that 9/11 was plotted by a group of religious fanatics called Al-Qaeda. It is an international terrorist group, and its main goal is to fight a jihad (a war waged by Muslims against infidels) against the Western world and Jews. Being based on a frenzy of Islamic fundamentals, Al-Qaeda organized many violent attacks, such as assassinations, suicide bombings, and hijackings to show their respect to Allah (Bajoria and Bruno). Someone can say Al-Qaeda is merely a group of lunatic people who were under the slogan of religion, and they are not religious believers. However, honestly, by either reviewing the history or looking at contemporary era, there are plenty of examples that can show that religion is relevant to violence because of religious fanaticism and demonization. The main reason that religion causes violence is religious fanaticism. Throughout history, it is easy to find some religious wars, such as the Crusades, the Muslim Conquests, the French Wars of Religion, and the Reconquista, which were always related to religious zealotry. Above…
- 1446 Words
- 6 Pages
Best Essays -
Stern, Jessica. Terror in the name of God. Why Religious militants kill. Harper Collins Publishers Inc. 2003…
- 1293 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The recent terror attack in Mumbai was condemned severely by various governments across the world.What is the effect of this attack.??…
- 13433 Words
- 37 Pages
Good Essays -
Terrorism. It is a word that strikes fear into many. Terrorism has been around since the beginning of time, and has caused empires to rise, fall, and allowed people to gain power. Terrorism is a growing problem in this unstable world. A simple act of terrorism can cause tensions to break between two countries, as seen with Israel and Palestine’s conflicts due to religious beliefs and territory disputes. Among the various potential threats are wars with neighboring countries, missile attacks on cites, biological and chemical terrorism, suicide bombings, and hostage taking. In an April 1999 survey the most feared terrorism was bombings on US soil. (Cole, 1) There are many ways to combat terrorism. First, would be an international team that is always on call to respond to terrorist threats, and retrieve hostages with minimal loss of life. The second is gun control, which would limit the weapons accessed by potential terrorists. The last thing is to recognize terrorist organizations before they have a chance to attack. Terrorism has been around since the days of ancient Egypt. People have been killing leaders of countries to try and overthrow the government, and for the past one hundred and twenty years terrorists have had ne…
- 529 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Russia has pursued a multi-vector foreign policy since 2000, when Vladimir Putin began his first term as Russian president. Putin focused on establishing strong alliance – type relations with the United States and on further integration with the European Union as part of what was called Russia’s “European choice.” That short period was characterized by Putin’s support for the U.S. after the events of 11 September 2001 and was highlighted by Putin’s speech to the German parliament in October 2001. By the middle of the decade, however, Russia had left the West’s political orbit to position itself in opposition to the U.S. on key global policy issues. The culmination of that period is the five-day Russian-Georgian war in 2008, and its most prominent “literary testament” is Putin’s Munich speech of February 2007. The third period was Dmitry Medvedev’s in form, but Putin’s in essence. It was marked by a ‘reset’ in Russian-U.S. relations and textually characterized by an order from the Russian government to foster ‘modernization partnerships’ with developed states. The change in Russian foreign policy orientation does not coincide precisely with the presidential terms of Putin and Medvedev, but there is some connection there. Russia’s foreign policy has changed again following Putin’s return to power, but the change in presidents is certainly not the main reason for that. Putin remained the leader under Medvedev and it was he who determined the foreign policy vector. New key factors include significant changes in Russia’s domestic situation and a shifting global environment in which this policy is implemented.…
- 510 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
2.Terrorism and religious terrorism are viewed as victories and exultation in the eyes of people who are supportive of the religions and who advocate such acts. The act of the 'Holy War' is something that occurs after much oppression or is caused by some elemental hatred that stems from something far more disastrous. There are various terrorist groups operating in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Israel and they have been targeting either the people of other religions or the crowded public places where innocent people are their primary victims.…
- 878 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
M.G.Marshall – Global Terrorism: An Overview and Analysis (Draft 09/11/02) Page 2 of 48 “Dulce bellum inexpertis” 1 – Erasmus Overview The subject of “terrorism” seized the world’s attention in late 2001 as a result of one fairly brief, yet highly dramatic and destructive, attack on two of the core symbols of the world’s most powerful political actor, the United States of America. The targeting of the World Trade Center in New York City, the symbol of the United States’ enormous global economic power, and the Pentagon Building in Washington, DC, the symbol of the United States’ overarching military superiority, was well planned, coordinated, and executed. The attack itself attained symbolic stature as an affront to the established global order, a challenge to the world’s dominant power, and an announcement that the prevailing US-led global order was not viewed, or valued, equally by all those whose daily lives are increasingly caught in the vortex of post-Cold War change. Of course, the problem of terrorism was already well-known when the planes struck their targets in full view of a vast, global, tele-connected audience and created their indelible psychic images of sophisticated savagery. The politics of terror, and the overpowering fear that terror produces in its wake, lay at the very foundation of the evolution of social order. And it is the ultimate irony of societal development that modern acts of savagery have attained such high levels of sophistication. In its most simple terms, terror has stood as the stark alternative to civility in social relations from the time of humankind’s earliest recorded reflections. As Hobbes explained in his 17th century treatise, “Out…
- 23466 Words
- 94 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There is terrorism in certain parts of the world because people do not share the same views as other people there are people who share different religious beliefs so if you do not share their belief they feel you have to be eliminated. People do not talk about the problems that they have with each other they rather kill that person or innocent people to get their point across. Violence never solves anything it just makes the other person want to do something more drastic and so many innocent people die when they did not have to. Sometimes people hate people for no reason if the person is gay or of a different race or they just want that power or status. Osama bin laden wanted that status by letting everyone know he was behind the crime that kill so many Americans I think he should of spend his time behind bars death was too easy for him. The sites where terrorist pick to bomb they have one thing in common a deep rooted hatred for example on July fifth two thousand and two forty one year old hesham Mohamed hadayet open fired on people while they were standing in line at the Israel el al ticket line at the los angelos airport he was armed with a forty five caliber handgun and a nine millimeter handgun he killed two people and wounded four before a security guard killed him he also had a six inch knife in his possession. The mayor of los Angelos at that time believe it was an isolated incident and president bush agreed with him Israel official view the incident differently they said it was at an Israel ticket line so he was connected to some terrorist organization. I do not think laws and procedures or organizations could prevent terrorist’s attacks because as much as you plan something to counterattack terrorism nothing is full proof they can have a different strategies just in case that one does not work. Attackers stormed the United States consulate in Saudi Arabia they over powered the guards at the gate and burned the American flag five of the…
- 841 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The events of 11 September 2001 present military lawyers—like the rest of the U.S. armed forces—with a variety of new challenges. Indeed, the war on terrorism raises complex legal issues (not the least of which is whether it is a “war” at all!). As difficult as it may be to determine what law applies to a particular question, the even more challenging task is to translate the legal analysis into something understandable to commanders and their troops. The purpose of this essay is to try to facilitate that assignment. What follows is a series of predicable questions occasioned by recent events. Each is accompanied by a suggested response. These answers are not intended to be comprehensive dissertations on every aspect of the topic queried, but rather on designed to give the nonspecialist a cogent statement of the key points. Realistically, the practitioner would be well served to consider the responses more as vectors for further study as opposed to final and definitive declarations. It is especially important to ensure that the proposed answers are “Shepardized,” so to speak, to ensure compliance with the most current authorities and national policy. Nevertheless, it is hoped tha5 the format and citations would provide legal professionals and their clients with a useful starting point in addressing the emerging challenges of America’s first “war” of the 21st century. 1. What is terrorism? Legally, terrorism is defined in the U.S. Code as “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents….”1 The U.S. Department of Defense defines it somewhat more broadly, calling it: “The calculated use of unlawful violence or the threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political,…
- 5571 Words
- 23 Pages
Good Essays -
Some three thousands innocent civilian deaths were accounted for in the past terrorism attacks on the September 11, 2001. Do you think that 's a problem? Despite, other global problems such as pollution, natural disasters, and global warming, terrorism tops all problems with the world we live in today because it results in many innocent lives, social issues, as well retaliation. This is an issue that has shown up all over the world and effects many countries. It seems to never stop only escalating into many of these problems discussed.…
- 679 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays