Preview

International Relations- Just War Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
International Relations- Just War Theory
JUST WAR THEORY | September 132011 | This project is based on the chapter of structures and processes of war under which the ‘Just War Theory’ is analyzed in reference to the US military intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks in US. | America’s Just War Theory |

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

CASE STUDY
Study is made on the US military attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan in post 9/11 era.
Nature of study is qualitative and library based.

SCOPE
The study of the project is limited to the era after the terrorist attack of 9/11 on US. The action initiated by George Bush to combat against terrorism which is famously known as the ‘BUSH DOCTRINE’. The military attacks made by the US on the gulf countries i.e. Iraq and Afghanistan in the light of Just War Theory.

RESEARCH QUESTION

1. What is just war theory? 2. Relation of just war theory in contemporary times? 3. Was just war theory justified by US military invasion on Iraq and Afghanistan?

INTRODUCTION

Just War Theories attempt to conceive of how the use of arms might be restrained made more humane and ultimately directed towards the aim of establishing lasting peace and justice. Contrary to facile accusations of absurdity, the idea of fighting for peace actually does make sense in theory. There is no more contradiction in waging war to keep warfare in check than there is in fighting fire with fire (which firefighters do all the time). Unfortunately, however, what makes sense in theory too often fails in practice. World War I was touted in the U.S. as "the war to end all war." Yet, the world has seen a lot of warfare since the end of World War I, some of it in more or less direct consequence of that war. Armed human conflicts turn out to be more complex, varied and difficult to control than something as relatively simple and predictable as fire.
In the following project, the researcher had tried to present an evaluation of the just war theory (JWT) using the US Military



References: iii. M. Walzer, ‘Justice and Injustice in the Gulf War’ in (ed.) D. Decosse, But was it Just? Reflections on the morality of the Persian Gulf War, (Doubleday: London, 1992) iv [ 4 ]. Childress, James F. (1978). "Just-War Theories: The Bases, Interrelations, Priorities, and Functions of Their Criteria". [ 7 ]. See U.S. Constitution Article II, para 2; War Powers Resolution, Publication Ltd. No. 93-148, 87 Stat. 555 (1973). [ 9 ]. The U.S. attacks were so precise that one critic described them as " 'pinprick ' bombing attacks." Paul Wolfowitz, Clinton 's Bay of Pigs, Wall Street Journal, Sept. 27, 1996, available in Westlaw, Allnews Database. [ 10 ]. (http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0313-04.html) (Published on Tuesday, March 13, 2001 in the Cape Cod Times , America 's 'Just War ' Theory by Sean Gonsalves)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Storm of Steel Paper

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to answer this question it is first important to determine the fraises “pro-war” and “anti-war”. The term “pro-war” describes an attitude in which war is desired, necessary or justifiable. The term “anti-war” describes the opposite; war is viewed as immoral and is generally opposed and condemned. This paper will argue that there are grounds in the book to support both proposition.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9/11 Summary

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The attack on the United States on September 11, 2001 (better known as 9/11) by Osama Bin Laden rammed a wedge into the relationship between the United States and the Islamic world. In result the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and the invaded Iraq. Professor Irogbe’s article on the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq argues that the U.S. actions are igniting rather than reducing global terrorism and if U.S. were to withdraw troops from these countries it would promise for global peace and security. The article covers the cost of human and financial resources of the war, abuses committed by invaders including the application of extraordinary rendition, the indefinite detention of prisoners…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Foreign Policy

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is common today that the United States foreign policy has been inspiring to a lot of nations worldwide. It is argued by a lot of political scholars that the 9/11 terrorist attack actually shaped the United States foreign policy. Even though it is debatable to if the 9/11 attack did shape the United States foreign policy and how it did that can be discovered at the end of this essay. This will be proven by analysing a theoretical view of terrorism and a little background of what happened in September 11, 2001 and the United States foreign policy before the 9/11 attack followed by policies like the Bush doctrine, Obama doctrine and also looking at their criticisms.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz, C. On War. Michael Howard and Peter Paret, eds. and trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Just War In Vietnam

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The focus of this investigation is the theory or concept of just war, and what makes a just war “Just.” This investigation will explore the question: To what extent can the Vietnam War be justified as a just war? Throughout this investigation, the philosophy of a just war will be broken down into its fundamental components. The purpose of this is to identify the extent of which…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision to go to war has nothing to do with the individuals fighting the war. The warfighters are merely following the orders of the politicians and heads of state who have decided to enter into a war. Walzer claims, “We draw a line between the war itself, for which soldiers are not responsible, and the conduct of the war, for which they are responsible, at least within their own sphere of activity” (39). Soldiers are only responsible for what they directly take part in, so as long as both sides, whether fighting a just or unjust war, follow Jus in Bello principals all soldiers should have the same moral equality. However, Jeff McMahan presents a refutation to this belief in his piece, “Rethinking the ‘Just War’ Part 1”, in which he poses the idea that soldiers are directly responsibility for justice/ injustice of a war. McMahan adheres to a school of thought known as the revisionist approach which believes, “ … that it is the individual…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Below is a free essay on "10 Commandments" from Anti Essays, your source for free research papers, essays, and term paper examples.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phillips, Rachel. "Counterpoint: ‘Enemy Combatant’ Is an Illegitimate Exercise of Uncontrolled Power." Points of View (2011). Ebscohost.com. Points of View, 23 June 2011. Web. 21 May 2012.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics