Intercultural Relations

Question: There is no need to study intercultural relation. Discuss
Communication occurs between individuals who have varying degree of intimacy within each other. Intercultural relations capability is the degree to which people effectively adapt his/her nonverbal and verbal messages to the appropriate cultural context (Kiss 2008). Intercultural relations can be taken place when individuals influenced by different cultural societies exchange shared meanings in communication. Yet, intercultural relations can be formed of different nationalities, different ethnic and even different religion, as well as communication among individuals of different sexual orientation. However, communicating and exchanging values within different culture of individuals is complex as communication process is apparently complicated involving cognitive process, cultural background, individual’s linguistic capability and even biological process.
Stienfatt and Roger 1999, claims that one of the most illuminating aspects of intercultural communication is that it opens our minds to the interplay of varied influenced. The world these days is facing great challenges of an increasingly diverse in cultures. Interaction and exchanging values between individuals from different cultures can lead to a whole host of benefits, for instance establishing good relationships within society and healthier communities. Yet, culture allows individuals to connect in small communities to larger communities through exchanged experiences and values (Lull 1995). Intercultural relations assist students step back from their characteristic point of view of seeing the world and demonstrates the influences that have constructed the ways of viewing this world. Cited in Stienfatt and Roger 1999, Gitlin 1995 indicated the concept of people thinking that human think within the intellectual and cultural currents that surround them.
Back into the last decade, invasion; colonialization; and warfare brought individuals among countries with divergent cultures into face-to-face contact. An improvement of technologies in communication and rapidly evolving the transportation has changed the way individuals interact and communicate with each other in terms of intercultural relations and communication. However, people from different cultures are usually representative of divergent norms and psychological elements. The crusade explored that communication through various cultures occurred among individuals by human nature. Jerusalem is one of great examples cities in Middle East where people in different cultures and religions; Muslims; Christian; and Jews living together in relative peacefulness and harmoniousness. After the fall of the Roman Empire, Jerusalem indicated that communication effectiveness among divergent cultures and religions are not relying on the study of intercultural relations. Nevertheless, cited in Yinyan 2013, Y.Y. Kim (1988) argued that person who wishes to accomplish an effective intercultural interaction in terms of intercultural relations must be equipped with skills and abilities to be capable and deal with dynamics of cultural diversity. Yet, cite in Sydney morning herald article, Munro (2009) had explored the experiences of an Australian diplomat who worked in Jakarta decided to resign from her workplace due to the strict rules of international diplomacy.
The purpose of this essay is demonstrated the necessity of intercultural relations for human being and discuss the terms of intercultural. People are socialized in their own culture and also different in cultures are different norms. An effectiveness communication in intercultural relations can occur by human being in every generation as indicated in our predecessors in Crusades which is people should be culturally sensitive.

Bibliography
Kiss, G.(2000). A theoretical approach to intercultural communication. Communication, 7, 435-443
Lull, James (1995). Media, Communication, Culture: A Global Approach, UK: Polity Press in Association with Blackwells, pp.129-159
Munro, C.(2009, November 19) The cultural conundrum of losing face. Sydney morning herald, p.4.
Rogers, Everett M. and Stienfatt, Thomas M.(1999). Intercultural Commination, Illinios: Waveland Press, pp. 1-38
Yinyan, H.(2013) Psychocultural factors affecting intercultural communication effectiveness. China: Dalian Institute of Light Industry.

Bibliography: Kiss, G.(2000). A theoretical approach to intercultural communication. Communication, 7, 435-443 Lull, James (1995). Media, Communication, Culture: A Global Approach, UK: Polity Press in Association with Blackwells, pp.129-159 Munro, C.(2009, November 19) The cultural conundrum of losing face. Sydney morning herald, p.4. Rogers, Everett M. and Stienfatt, Thomas M.(1999). Intercultural Commination, Illinios: Waveland Press, pp. 1-38 Yinyan, H.(2013) Psychocultural factors affecting intercultural communication effectiveness. China: Dalian Institute of Light Industry.