Preview

Integrating Self-Regulation Theories of Work Motivation Into a Dynamic

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
16610 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Integrating Self-Regulation Theories of Work Motivation Into a Dynamic
Human Resource Management Review 18 (2008) 1–18

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Human Resource Management Review j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / h u m r e s

Integrating self-regulation theories of work motivation into a dynamic process theory
Jeffrey B. Vancouver ⁎
Department of Psychology, 200 Porter Hall, Ohio University, Athens, OH 4501, United States

a r t i c l e

i n f o

a b s t r a c t
Instead of merely combining theories of self-regulation, the current paper articulates a dynamic process theory of the underlying cognitive subsystems that explain relationships among longused constructs like goals, expectancies, and valence. Formal elements of the theory are presented in an attempt to encourage the building of computational models of human actors, thinkers, and learners in organizational contexts. Discussion focuses on the application of these models for understanding the dynamics of individuals interacting in their organizations. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Self-regulation Control theory Goals Computational modeling Dynamic processes

“The challenge to motivation theory now is more theoretical and research-based than practical. We have many of the pieces to the puzzle, we simply need to figure out how to assemble them.” (Landy & Conte, 2004, p. 364) The field of human resource management (HRM) is premised on the notion that HRM is facilitated by understanding the nature of the resource (i.e., humans). Part of this understanding relates to individual differences in knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics (e.g., personality), and part to the processes and parameters that affect motivation (Campbell & Pritchard, 1976). Of these two parts, the latter has arguably been the more difficult and disarrayed (Mitchell, 1997). Yet, most comprehensive theories of motivation were abandoned or grossly simplified, often by their originators, because of the



References: Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50, 179−211. Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (1999). Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 231−292. 16 J.B. Vancouver / Human Resource Management Review 18 (2008) 1–18 Anderson, J. A. (1995). An introduction to neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124−140. Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370−398. Ashmos, D. P., & Huber, G. P. (1987). The systems paradigm in organizational theory: Correcting the record and suggesting the future. Academy of Management Review, 12, 607−621. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359−372. Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338−375. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman & Co. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87−99. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462−479. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617−645. Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 707−721. Image theory. Beach, L. R. (Ed.). (1998). Theoretical and empirical foundations Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1990). Image theory: A behavioral theory of decision making in organizations. In B. Staw, & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12. (pp. 1−41)Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc. Beck, R. C. (2000). Motivation: Theories and Principles, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99−112. Blount, S., & Janicik, G. A. (2001). When plans change: Examining how people evaluate timing changes in work organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 566−585. Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory — The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197−208. Brehm, J. W. (1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 3, 2−22. Brief, A. P. (1998). Attitudes in and around organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193−217. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432−459. Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191−214. Campbell, J. P., & Pritchard, R. D. (1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 63−130). Chicago: Rand McNally. Campion, M. A., & Lord, R. G. (1982). A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 30, 265−287. Cannon, W. B. (1939). The wisdom of the body. New York: Norton. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19−35. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chulef, A. S., Read, S. J., & Walsh, D. A. (2001). A hierarchical taxonomy of human goals. Motivation & Emotion, 25, 191−232. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cortina, J. M. (2002). Big things have small beginnings: An assortment of “minor” methodological misunderstandings. Journal of Management, 28, 339−362. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671−684. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Dailey, R. C., & Kirk, D. J. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover. Human Relations, 45, 305−317. Diefendorff, J. M., & Gosserand, R. H. (2003). Understanding the emotional labor process: A control theory perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 945−959. Edgell, S. E., & Roe, R. M. (1995). Dimensional information facilitates the utilization of configural information: A test of the Castellan–Edgell and the Gluck–Bower models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1495−1508. Edwards, J. R. (1992). A cybernetic theory of stress, coping, and well-being in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 17, 238−274. Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Forgas, J. P. (2002). Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 1−28. Forgas, J. P., & Ciarrochi, J. V. (2002). On managing moods: Evidence for the role of homeostatic cognitive strategies in affect regulation. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 28, 336−345. Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3−34. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Garst, H., Frese, M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2000). The temporal factor of change in stressor–strain relationships: A growth curve model on a longitudinal study in East Germany. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 417−438. Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., & Ehrhart, K. H. (2002). Methodological issues in cross-cultural organizational research. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 216−246). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 166−195. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The Psychology of Action (pp. 287−312). New York: Guilford Press. Hammond, K. R., Stewart, T. R., Brehmer, B., & Steinmann, D. O. (1986). Social judgment theory. In H. R. Arkes, & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 56−76). New York: Cambridge University Press. Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1229−1245. Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (2000). Explanation-based decision making. In T. Connolly, H. R. Arkes, & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and Decision Making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 212−228)., 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy theory: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319−340. Hill, W. F. (1985). Learning: A survey of psychological interpretations, 4th ed. New York: Harper & Row. Hulin, C. L., & Ilgen, D. R. (2000). Introduction to computational modeling in organizations: The good that modeling does. In D. R. Ilgen, & C. L. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline: 3–18 Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association. Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Hyland, M. E. (1988). Motivational control theory: An integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 642−651. Jagacinski, R. J., & Flach, J. M. (2003). Control theory for humans: Quantitative approaches to modeling performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237−251. Kanfer, R. (1990). In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology, 2nd ed. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1. (pp. 75−170) Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists ' Press. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285−308. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons. J.B. Vancouver / Human Resource Management Review 18 (2008) 1–18 17 Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 150−172. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254−284. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331−378. Kukla, A. (1972). Foundations of an attributional theory of performance. Psychological Review, 79, 454−470. Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the 21st Century. Annual Review of Psychology. Landy, F. J. (1978). An opponent process theory of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 533−547. Landy, F., & Conte, F. (2004). Work in the 21st century. New York: McGraw-Hill. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper. Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). In J. Hunt (Ed.), Levels of aspirationPersonality and the behavior disorders, Vol. 1. (pp. 333−378) New York: Ronald Press. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal-setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2004). What should we do about work motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29, 388−403. Lord, R. G., & Levy, P. E. (1994). Moving from cognition to action: A control theory perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 335−367. Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology, 2nd ed. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2. (pp. 1−62) Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists ' Press. Luce, R. D. (1995). Four tensions concerning mathematical modeling in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 1−26. Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (Eds.). (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356−376. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. Oxford: Irvington. McClelland, K. (1994). Perceptual control and social power. Sociological Perspectives, 37, 461−496. McPhail, P., Clark, R. K., Powers, W. T., & Tucker, C. W. (1992). Simulating individual and collective action in temporary gatherings. Social Science Computer Review, 10, 1−28. Mellers, B. A., & McGraw, A. P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 210−214. Miller, J. G. (1978). Living Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill. Miller, G., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley. Mitchell, T. (1997). In B. Staw, & L. Cummings (Eds.), Matching motivational strategies with organizational contextsResearch in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 19. (pp. 57−149) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530−547. Mook, D. (1996). Motivation: The organization of action, (2nd ed.) New York: Norton. More, K., Yoder, R., & Vancouver, J. B. (2004, Junee). Resource Allocation under Various Levels of Self-Efficacy and Valence. Poster presented at the annual American Psychological Society conference, Chicago. Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226−256. Mowday, R. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 195−229. Naylor, J. D., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pearce, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (2001). Theories of associative learning in animals. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 111−139. Phillips, J. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. (1996). Prevalence and prediction of positive discrepancy creation: Examining a discrepancy between two selfregulation theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 498−511. Pinder, C. C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine. Powers, W. T., Clark, R. K., & McFarland, R. L. (1960a). A general feedback theory of human behavior: Part 1. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 11, 71−88. Powers, W. T., Clark, R. K., & McFarland, R. L. (1960b). A general feedback theory of human behavior: Part 2. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 11, 309−323. Pressing, J. (1999). The referential dynamics of cognition and action. Psychological Review, 106, 714−747. Pritchard, R. D., Holling, H., Lammers, F., & Clark, B. D. (2002). Improving organizational performance with the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System: An international collaboration. Huntington, New York: Nova Science. Quiñones, M. A., & Ehrenstein, A. (Eds.). (1997). Training for a rapidly changing workplace Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Richardson, G. P. (1991). Feedback thought: In social science and systems theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306−1314. Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108, 370−392. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policycapturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66−80. Scherbaum, C.A., & Vancouver, J.B. (2002). Testing a computational goal-discrepancy reducing model of discrepancy production. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada. Schmidt, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2007). What to do? The effect of discrepancies, incentives, and time on dynamic goal prioritization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 928−941. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday. Seo, M., Barrett, L. F., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). The role of affective experience in work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 423−439. Shoda, Y., LeeTierman, S., & Mischel, M. (2002). Personality as a dynamical system: Emergence of stability and distinctiveness from intra- and interpersonal interactions. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 6, 316−325. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. New York: John Wiley. Simon, H. A. (1992). What is an “explanation” of behavior? Psychological Science, 3, 150−161. Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1973). An opponent-process theory of motivation: II. Cigarette addiction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81, 158−171. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1997). A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behavior modification on task performance, 1975–95. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1122−1149. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1978). Commitment to a policy decision: A multi-theoretical perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 40−64. Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10, 291−330. Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence; an experimental study of the associative processes in animals. New York: Macmillan. Van Eerde, W., & Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom 's expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 575−586. Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: Understanding humans, organizations, and social processes. Behavioral Science, 41, 165−204. Vancouver, J. B. (2000). Self-regulation in organizational settings: A tale of two paradigms. In P. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 303−341). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 18 J.B. Vancouver / Human Resource Management Review 18 (2008) 1–18 Vancouver, J. B. (2005). The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 38−52. Vancouver, J. B., & Day, D. V. (2005). Industrial and organization research on self-regulation: From constructs to applications. Applied Psychology: International Review, 54, 155−185. Vancouver, J. B., More, K. M., & Yoder, R. J. (2008). Self-efficacy and resource allocation: Support for a discontinuous model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 35−47. Vancouver, J. B., & Putka, D. J. (2000). Analyzing goal-striving processes and a test of the generalizability of perceptual control theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 334−362. Vancouver, J. B., Putka, D. J., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2005). Testing a computational model of the goal-level effect: An example of a neglected methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 100−127. Vancouver, J. B., & Scherbaum, K. L. (2003, Aprill). Computational model accounting for relationship between self-efficacy and resource allocation. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando. Vancouver, J. B., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2008). Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models. Computational and Mathematical Organizational Theory, 14, 1−22. Vancouver, J. B., Tamanini, K. B., & Yoder, R. J. (in press). Using dynamic computational models to reconnect theory and research: A socialization by the proactive newcomer exemplar. Journal of Management. Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships between self-efficacy, personal goals and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605−620. Vancouver, J. B., & Tischner, E. C. (2004). The effect of feedback sign on task performance depends on self-concept discrepancies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1092−1098. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley. Weiss, H. M. (1990). In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Learning theory and industrial and organizational psychology, 2nd ed. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1. (pp. 171−221) Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists ' Press. Whyte, G. (1993). Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach.. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 430−455. Wright, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1989). Energization and goal attractiveness. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 169−210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (2005). Theories of learning. In K. Lamberts, & R. L. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition (pp. 161−182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Zurada, J. M. (1992). Introduction to artificial neural systems. St. Paul, MN: West.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Course Project Gt 591

    • 4537 Words
    • 14 Pages

    References: Aamodt, M.G. (2007). Industrial/Organizational Psychology: An Applied Approach (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth Corporation.…

    • 4537 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Jft2

    • 3988 Words
    • 16 Pages

    References: Cliffe Notes, (2012). Retrieved from http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/ Motivation-Theories-Individual-Needs.topicArticleId-8944,articleId-8908.html DeLong, T. and Ager, D., (2004). HBS cases are developed solely as the basis for class discussion. President and Fellows of Harvard College. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 1-800-545-7685, write Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA 02163, or go to http:// www.hbsp.harvard.edu. This document is authorized for use only in JFT2 — Organizational Management —14 by Faculty at Western Governors University from October 2012 to July 2014. Kreitner, R., Kinicke, A. (2010). Organizational Behavior, 9th Ed., McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NY. Wikipedia, (2012). Leadership retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Leadership.…

    • 3988 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fred Maiorino Case

    • 8426 Words
    • 34 Pages

    Humphreys, J. (2003). The dysfunctional evolution of goal setting. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 96-96. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from Business Source Complete database.…

    • 8426 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cole, N. (2009). Journal Of Business & Psychology. Journal of Business & Psychology, 24(4), 363-372.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comm 222 Outline

    • 2380 Words
    • 10 Pages

    John Molson School of Business Department of Management Comm 222: Organizational Behaviour and Theory Winter 2013 General Information Comm 222 Section E Class times: Monday & Wednesday 8:45 – 10:00 Class location: MB 3.430 Credits: 3 Instructor:…

    • 2380 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Ivancevich, J. M., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M.T. (2011). Motivation. In Organizational Behavior and Management. (9th ed., pp.119-148) New York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 2084 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Industrial-Organizational (I/O) psychology is the study of human behavior at work and it is concerned with the development of and application of scientific principles to the workplace (Spector, 2008). In this field of I/O psychology there are many topics that outlined how individuals will perform at work and how successful they will be. Some of these topics are as fallows Goal setting, Selection, Employee Motivation, Job satisfaction, Emotions at work, Burnout, and Occupational Stress. In the film, 12 Angry Men (Rose et al., 1957) shows various topics of I/O psychology that are concerned with the 12 jurors in their workplace and their decision-making. In this paper I will explain how the film, 12 Angry Men (Rose et al., 1957) explains several topics of I/O psychology on how they are applied in the workplace. I will begin by given a short synopsis of the film and then explain five different I/O psychology topics that were portrayed in the film. The I/O psychology topics that I will discuss are as fallows, goal setting, job satisfaction, emotions at work, occupational stress, and finally group think…

    • 3471 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    I/O Psychology and the Union

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Dunnette, M.D. & Hough, L.M. (1994). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., vol. 4). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.…

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2008). Introduction to Organizational Psychology. In S. M. Jex, & T.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goal Setting Theory

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If we would apply this example to a theory of industrial and organization psychology, we would look at…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cascio, W.F. 1998, Applied psychology and human resource management, 5th edn, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    As companies continue to grow and profit, employees are seizing opportunities to gain profit as well. Every industry is being impacted by employee theft. Although there is statistical data that provides a multitude of motivating factors why an employee will commit theft, no one really knows the mindset of the employee. Ingram (1994) stated that “most employees see stealing as an unofficial compensation and a justifiable pay back for what is viewed as employer greed.” However, there is no one factor more significant than the other as to why an employee you trust would come to work, do the job given, then steal…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kyle L. et al., (2007), “Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes”, Department of Management, USA , Volume 103, Issue 2, July 2007, Pages 159-178, Available at: www.sciencedirect.com, (Accessed:12 November 2007 )…

    • 2436 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Job redesign and workplace awards are ways to improve employee performance and the organization’s productivity. It is important that the organization get the maximum from an employee while at the same the employee should be satisfied in the workplace. In this paper, I will address the system of goal-setting, performance evaluation, and workplace rewards that impact productivity, both positively and negatively, and job satisfaction at my place of employment.…

    • 1884 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Motivation in the Workforce

    • 3927 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Managing employees is cited as being the biggest problem to small business owners. This is because employers very often don't know how to handle employees. Effectively managing employees is a skill acquired through training and practice. Many books have been written on the subject, and courses are regularly offered through educational institutions.…

    • 3927 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays