Integrating Leadership Styles
Effective leadership methodology creates channels of communication pertinent to employee/manager/leader succession. Leadership is adaptable, and is capable of changing technique as best fit for organizational and employee progression. Singular approaches toward leadership ability (e.g. trait, behavior, power-influence) are all significant in scope, and in combination, can be highly effective in generating trust in subordinates. The capability to transgress leadership style between approaches is known as the integrative approach, which “involves more than one type of leadership variable” (Yuki, 2010, p. 15). Incorporating various methods strategically allows for transitional communication and leadership requirements that alternate between individuals. Employee interactions are all different, and fragile, and are in need of individual accommodation to understand leadership at full capacity. Strengths in Integrating Leadership Approaches
The primary strength for integrating leadership approaches is the ability to lead through different channels. Reception to leadership is unique to individuals, and most subordinates do not share similar competencies in terms of listening and communicating objectives. For example, combining trait and power-influence behavior as an approach to guide a specific group of employees may be more effective than the passive managerial style. Leadership development is in constant transgression, where “organizations—commercial, not-for-profit, and government—need leaders with different skills and a richer set of them to lead us into the future” (Goldsmith, Hesselbein, 2006, p. 174). Singular methods of communicating expectations are becoming obsolete for the direction of business and the capability to create lateral movement organizationally is an underlying job function for employees willing to succeed. The subordinate and manager must work together to meet organizational goals. The...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document