Preview

Intangible Assets as a Source of Competitive Advantage

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Intangible Assets as a Source of Competitive Advantage
Intangible Assets as a Source of Competitive Advantage
Look No Further
Managing Intangibles seems to be a smart idea. But to bet on it, one has to create a whole new organization. The concept of intangibles is not new, but across the globe, companies are slowly coming to grips with it. tury back physical, tangible assets created wealth; today, it’s intangible assets that are creating wealth. It’s a concept that packs a lot of punch but has no form as such. It questions capitalism for its emphasis on buying assets like plant and machinery, and hiring executives and workers to run those to make money in the process. Managing Intangibles seems to be a smart idea. But to bet on it, one has to create a whole new organization. Management control systems are built around the framework of strategy, structure and systems. Typically, the top management is considered as the resource allocator and is the grand strategist, while the junior management is considered as implementors and middle management as administrators of the strategy. Using intangible assets means that you move from this structure to the purpose, process and people structure. Here the role of the top management is only to create an overarching purpose and allow people the freedom to deliver. Companies which are hot on intangible assets look out for a completely different set of signals in business than those which are not. Researches have shown that customer loyalty and employee commitment are two of the most important intangible assets. As such a company that believes in intangible assets wouldn’t so much look for market share figures as it would for customer satisfaction figures. As the concept of intangible assets gathers
EFFECTIVE EXECUTIVE

S T RA T E G Y

F

orget plant, machinery, capital. Think of people, processes, brands, relationships…. World over, business is moving into a new era, where competitive advantage comes from intangible assets. Welcome to the age of a new asset, the Intangible

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The internal forces being analyzed include processes and systems, technological, and intellectual property, during the implementation of a strategy in a company. Strengths allow an organization to gain competitive advantage by properly using resources and capabilities. Weaknesses limit the company ability to meet customers’ needs and put the organization in disadvantage (Pearce & Robinson, 2009). MCS biggest strengths are the ability to implement, control, and monitor new processes, which have allowed the company to offer quality services in a timely manner. The use of technology is also one of the biggest strengths for MCS. The company counts with a good information system, which has streamlined many processes within the organization, and at the…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Costco Analysus

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Intangible resources: brand image, buyer loyalty, goodwill reputation and the strong human assets and intellectual capital of managers. The compensation system and the motivation level of company personnel…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bus 530 IFL

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ballow, J., Burgman, R., Molnar, M. (2004) "Managing for shareholder value: intangibles, future value and investment decisions", Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 25…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    T&D is how organizations invest in their employees (Cartwright, 2003). It’s the structured, planned, and targeted facilitation of “employees’ learning of job related competencies (Noe, 2010, p.5).” However, developing proficient, adaptable, and innovative team members is not a simple process. It has proven to be one of the most critical aspects of an organizations overall strategic objective. Organizations that embrace T&D easily adapt to their operational environment. It allows organizations to grow and learn from change by developing (or reinforcing) the requisite skills, knowledge, and attributes needed to remain competitive.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jetstar Internal Analysis

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Hubbarb, Rice and Beamish (2008) organisation resources can be defined as the tangible and intangible assets of the organisation. Tangible assets are those items that are easy to identify and both fixed and current assets for example machinery, buildings, lands and inventory. For Qantas Jetstar Domestic, the tangible resources would be the 10 new aircrafts and with up to 64 daily services that is going to be adding on to the business from September 2012(Saurine 2012). The reason for Jetstar for doing this is because they just owned the title of the most late-running planes of all major Australian domestic airlines in the past year (Saurine 2012) therefore this is one of their strategy to try to keep up with the business. On the other hand, the intangibles assets would be their organisation reputations and operating knowledge and experiences. This is where the tangible comes in handy because by having the tangible assets, it helps Jetstar to build up their reputations (Hubbarb et al. 2008) for examples they are trying their best to make sure they have enough plane and will be on time for every route so that they will have great reputation and also gained back the consumers’ trust. They also make sure their staffs have minimum requirement before hiring them and also offers them travel benefits to keep them happy (Jetstar 2012) as Harter (2011) mentioned that research shows that staffs perform better when the organisation keeps them happy and especially with the skills and requirements that they already got, they will provide outstanding services to the customers and keep the customers happy.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A) What kind of intangible assets might a health care products company have? Does the composition of these intangibles matter to investors-that is, would it be perceived differently if all of Merck’s intangibles were goodwill, than if all of its intangibles were patents?…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    valuable asset a business can have. A business with well trained and very motivated staff,…

    • 2954 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identify all tangible interrelationships – examine value chains of each business unit for actual and possible opportunities for sharing…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gucci Strategy

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    -3) organizational capabilities: competencies and skills a firm employs to transform assets to outputs. Refers to what a firm does with the resources under its control. Capacity to make decisions, coordinate resource usage. Like processes and routines.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brynjolfsson, a professor of management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Sloan School of Management and the codirector of the Center for eBusiness@MIT, is one of a new breed of economists who invoke the concept of "organizational capital" to describe a whole range of intangible assets and investments necessary to leverage IT investments into fully productive parts of a successful, even innovative, business. His in-depth studies of more than 800 of the Fortune 1,000 companies—extending back to the pre-Internet economy—have provided some of the most tangible evidence of the value of the intangible assets that make up "organizational capital." At the end of a two-hour interview with journalist Mark Kindley in his office at MIT, Brynjolfsson mused on how he would characterize organizational capital. It's not so much an economic theory or an accepted fact. Rather, he said, "It's a perspective. It lets you see things you might not otherwise see." CIO INSIGHT: What is organizational capital? BRYNJOLFSSON: I think of organizational capital as analogous to physical capital. Just as you make an investment in the bricks and mortar of a factory, you could also make an investment in a new supplychain system, inventory-management system or a new accounts-payable process. They may take hundreds or thousands of person-hours to redesign and implement; they may require consultants and special software and be very costly to put into…

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a world where competition gets tougher and tighter, it does not pay to play around and settle with typical and average situations. It is not valuable that we settle for anything less. Hence, it is necessary that we improve on what we got and acquire some assets that we do not possess.…

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Value is created when intangible resources are deployed and degrades when they remain unused. Today knowledge or more colloquially, intelligence and brainpower have become the key determinant for the economic and business success. The key success factor of an individual business enterprise is no longer its sheer size or the number of tangible assets it controls – It is its Human Capital.…

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120. Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (2000): The dominant logic: retrospective and extension, Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1), 5-14. Boekestein, B. (2006). The relation of intellectual capital and intangible assets of pharmaceutical companies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7 (2): 241-253. Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management, 18: 433-462. Bontis N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3:41-60. Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M. & Hulland, J. (2002): Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows, Journal of Management Studies, 39 (4), 437-469. Bromiley, P. (2009). A prospect theory model of resource allocation. Decision Analysis, 6 (3): 124-138. Chen, M., Cheng, S. & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital, and firm’s market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6 (2): 159-176. Davis, J.P., Eisenhardt, K.M. & Bingham, C.B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods, Academy of Management Review, 32: 480-499. Dierickx, I. & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage, Management Science, 35 (12), 1504-1511. Donaldson, G. & Lorsch, J. (1983): Decision Making at the Top, Basic Books, New York. Firer, S. & Williams, S. M. (2003). Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4 (3): 348-360. Forrester, J. W. (1961): Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Gary, M. S., Wood, R. E. (2011). Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity, Strategic Management Journal, 32: 569-594.…

    • 7029 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Achieving Strategic Fit

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Strategic fit express the degree to which an organization is matching its resources and capabilities with the opportunities in the external environment. The matching takes place through strategy and it is therefore vital that the company have the actual resources and capabilities to execute and support the strategy. Strategic fit can be used actively to evaluate the current strategic situation of a company as well as opportunities as M&A and divestitures of organizational divisions. Strategic fit is related to the Resource-based view of the firm which suggests that the key to profitability is not only through positioning and industry selection but rather through an internal focus which seeks to utilize the unique characteristics of the company’s portfolio of resources and capabilities.[1] A unique combination of resources and capabilities can eventually be developed into a competitive advantage which the company can profit from. However, it is important to differentiate between resources and capabilities. Resources relate to the inputs to production owned by the company, whereas capabilities describe the accumulation of learning the company possesses. Resources can be classified both as tangible and intangible:…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kaplan, R. S., Norton, David P. (2004), Measuring the Strategic Readiness of Intangible Assets, Harvard Business Review 82(2): 52-64.…

    • 18329 Words
    • 74 Pages
    Powerful Essays