Preview

Inna files

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
612 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Inna files
INNARTI NUR RIZKI RIFA’I
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS/C-1
POLITICS
I think the political system is suitable for the Indonesian Constitutional Democracy Pancasila . Why ? Because the philosophy of Pancasila is a nation that represents the people of Indonesia as well as a barometer of national life . While the '45 Constitution as the basic foundation of the state has a fundamental position in the administration of the country .Pancasila Democracy Constitutional concept that I offer here is how Democracy containing the sense that the supreme government is in the hands of the people get the strengthening of the nation's two main pillars of Pancasila and the Constitution '45 . The assumption , with our return on the two foundations of the Guidelines will be 'revived ' remember this moment we like ' lost its way ' as new policies are loaded with foreign intervention , particularly in the formulation and manufacture of Law .
And Parliamentary is a concept that I feel is right as the Indonesian system. Why ? Because in running a government that should be the barometer is not who the president or leader of his country , but its fundamental basis . My assumption going in a presidential system the president's powers overlap than as head of state as well as head of government , this resulting in instability and performance superiority that gave rise to the ' addictive power '. In addition , printed clearly on the 4th Sila , " Democracy guided by the wisdom in deliberation representation " . This clearly illustrates that the state administration was done by consensus , which means that the cabinet is necessary to have a high position that the Assembly or Parliament as the representative body of the people have a vital role in every policy and political direction of the country , not just as a formality institutional.
From the people, by the people, for the people. We use parliamentary system with cabinet, with pancasila constitutional democracy. The people of Indonesia and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jakarta Post. (2004, June 7). Scholars try to find a universal definition of democracy. (1) Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu:2048/pqcentral/docview/288289930/Record/1A031DF500CF4132PQ/1?accountid=12085#…

    • 7910 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wireshark

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Setting up a new government system for Anation is a difficult and slow task. Anotion should be a democratic nation. Since democracy is a nation is which every citizen has an equal say Anation should feel like this governmental system is what works best for them. Federalism would be utilized in this nation. By following the principles of common federalism power would be distributed at regional, national and supranational levels. By setting up a democratic government Anation can make choices that the citizens have a say in. The fact of the matter is that you cannot make everyone happy with any decision that is made. It is just not possible. So by have a democracy and electing officials and voting it gives the fairness or at least the illusion of fairness. I think that for Anation which is a country with several different religious factions this is a system that would work the best.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Parliamentary system in Great Britain and the Presidential system in the United States both have histories marked by an absence of abject failure, yet neither system can be considered truly perfect. Consequently, the analyst cannot conclude that either system is better; rather, he must recognize that there are merits and faults in both systems. The Parliamentary system tends to legislate efficiently, whereas a presidential system tends toward gridlock. However, the presidential system grants both elected representatives and citizens greater influence in government. The Parliamentary system tends to favor Prime Ministers who have much experience, whereas the Presidential system…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Dilemma

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many systems of governments that can be classified into different types. Some of them being common amongst countries and some of them not so much. The two main organizations and/or alternatives that are most familiar are the presidential systems and the parliamentary systems. Various distinctions between these two types of systems can be distinguished. In a presidential system, the president is set apart from the legislative branch where as in the parliamentary system the chief executive (prime minister) is part of the legislative branch (the parliament).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay, the authors aim to compare the systems of governance in Indonesia and Singapore, as well as how their differences have led to varied repercussions in both countries; those (repercussions) that will be closely examined here are the growth/development of stable governmental institutions, as well as the just rule of law. These are relatively newly-decolonized states existing side by side, in recent years taking different paths of governance. This resulted in wildly different outcomes. What was it about their different political paths that caused the difference? Is the fault with the democratic process, or with their implementation? Is there a certain developmental threshold within which democracy is just doomed to failure? Many of these questions traverse along peripheries of political doctrine and liberal ethics. Certainly, democracy is an unpredictable, and often messy process. Only by answering hard questions like these can it be better understood, and refined. This is what the authors hope to achieve.…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genocide In Indonesia

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Indonesia’s strong nationalism lead to their independence from the Dutch, who ruled for 350 years. With ethnic policy in the beginning of the 20th century, the Indonesians were given the ability to participate…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two most common types of democratic governmental systems are Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems. For many years, people have studied the effectiveness of both and have given reasons why a certain country should obtain a certain form of government. Examples of two countries that use these systems are Canada and the United States. Canada uses a traditional parliamentary system, and the United States uses a presidential system. In this paper, I will focus on the strengths of a parliamentary system, and the weaknesses of a presidential system, to prove my argument. Canada is better off with a parliamentary system then a presidential system for many reasons. In order for my argument to be persuasive, I will explain the differences in the two. In comparison to a presidential system, a parliamentary system has more closure in making decisions, the parties that exist within the system tend to be stronger, and there is a responsible government, which allows for the government leader to be more actively involved with its citizens.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Newmont Mining

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Political-legal environment in Indonesia has been challenging in decades. With Indonesia’s independence on August 17, 1945, Armed Sukarno became the first president and established “Guided Democracy.” In the mid-1960’s general Suharto’s Communist Party (PKI) led “New Order” administration and constructed a strong centralized and military-dominated government. At this period, Indonesia experienced significant economic growth and industrialization, dramatically improving health, education and living standards. After the Asian financial crisis of 1997, Abdurrahman Wahid, the founder of the National Awakening Party (PKB), elected president of Indonesia with the fall of Suharto’s regime. At his presidency, political-legal environment decentralized and government was not able to restore the Indonesia’s economic recession and avoided corruption. It caused political uncertainty among the business and industry sectors. Because of political-legal confusion, foreign firms faced conflicts in operation with local government’s law and policy and deterioration court system. The local Minahasa district demanded $8.2 million in back pay of taxes for waste material which under the central government of Suharto exempted before.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political systems

    • 7882 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Hard to say who wins, if there is a conflict between the president and the parliament, because they have the same legitimacy. Army decides many times. That’s why this system isn’t good for new democratic states.…

    • 7882 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A nation’s choice of government defines how the nation’s executive, legislative and judicial branches are to be arranged. All nation –state require some sort of government to avoid lawlessness. Democratic governments are those that allow citizens of nations equal say in how their government are manages either directly or through elected representatives. Two of the most popular types of democratic governments are presidential and parliamentary systems. These two forms of government are completely different from authoritative types of government that stop or limit the direct participation of citizens. Yet which form of government organization is the best, what are their distinct…

    • 3062 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    -direct democracy- people are directly responsible for making all the decisions, NO country governs this way…

    • 1700 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    III. Is Representative Democracy Best?A. For a representative democracy government to work their must be:i. A opportunity for genuine leadership competition1. individuals and parties be able to run for office2. free communication 3. voters perceive that meaningful choices existii. Guidelines for fair leadership campaigns.B. Framers of the constitution -i. Thought that representative democracy was best because -1. less chances of it offices being manipulated2. help prevent political offices being used for private gain3. reduce the need for constant pollsii. Set up government to protect -1. Civil rights of all people2. Minorities 3. From concentration placement of power. IV. How is Power Distributed in a Democracy?A. Elitei. Persons who possess…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similar parliamentary systems came into existence in states like Germany, Sweden, India, Japan, New Zealand, and Australia. The central feature of these systems is a fusion of legislative and executive power, that government is parliamentary in that it is drawn from the assembly or parliament. The strength of this system is that it supposedly delivers effective but responsible government.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparative Politics

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    between the executive and legislative bodies created with presidential systems. The focus of parlimentary systems is that the chief executive (prime minister, premier, etc.) is usually a member of the parliament. The prime minister appoints members to a cabinet as does a president. The dependency of support from the parliament allows an easier removal of the prime minister than the removal of a president. Parliament can oust a prime minister and his cabinet (government) with a vote of no-confidence. A president has a set time he/she will serve and is elected independently. The legislative body of a presidential system has no such capabilities to remove the president. The ease or cabinet removal by parlimentary systems causes instability in systems without a party majority in parliament. Presidential systems are more stable because of the inability of the legislature to oust the president.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First and foremost in order to enhance a common understanding, we must first understand the key terms in the question and that is Constitutionalism and Democratic Governance. To begin with, Constitutionalism is defined as a government conducted in accordance with and within the limits set by the fundamental law of the Constitution. The Constitution, as a body of written or unwritten basic law, is superior to and takes precedence over all ordinary acts of the legislature and over all decisions and actions of the executive branch of the government. Under the Constitution, restrictions on the discretionary authority of public officers and institutions are clearly recognized and regularly enforced. In short, the Constitution effectively limits the power of government. In addition to this, Johari states that constitutionalism stands for “the existence of a constitution in a state, which is the instrument of government, or the fundamental law of the land.” It is the complex of ideas, attitudes and patterns of behavior elaborating the principle that the authority of government derives from and is limited by a body of fundamental law pointed out. It also refers to government conduct with and the limits set by fundamental law of the land. Constitutionalism is a modern concept that desires a political order governed by laws and regulations. It means that the government rules under the laws of a…

    • 2401 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays