Sri Vinod was a lino opertro in press (NEWS Paper Company). He was the Secretary of the Employees cooperative society of that he was involved in financial irregularities and defalcation in the society. An inquiry was held against him and his services were terminated. Examine whether this termination is valid as per the Industrial Disputes Act. (Section 31-35)
Sir Vinod, the lino operator involved in financial irregularities in the society. On enquiry was held by the company.
Industrial disputes act 1947 sec 31-35
Penalty for other offences.-
Section 31(1) in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Any employer who contravenes the provisions of section 33 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Section 31(2) in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Whoever contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or any rule made thereunder shall, if no other penalty is elsewhere provided by or under this Act for such contravention, be punishable with fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
Section 32 in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Offence by companies, etc. - Where a person committing an offence under this Act is a company, or other body corporate, or an association of persons (whether incorporated or not), every director, manager, secretary, agent or other officer or person concerned with the management thereof shall, unless he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or consent, be deemed to be guilty of such offence.
Section 33(1) in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
During the pendency of any conciliation proceeding before a conciliation officer or a Board or of any proceeding before an arbitrator or a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal in respect of an industrial dispute, no employer shall— a) In regard to any matter connected with the dispute, alter, to the prejudice of...