Individual Privacy vs. National Security
Cevin S. woods
ENG: English Composition II
Nov, 14, 2012
On September, 11, 2001, the united states where under attacked my terrorist that have been living in America for many years. They went to flight school and were trained by Americans, so they needed a new way to strike so that puts the wars of the past into new category then from the wars of years past. So the government went into action on the USA Patriot act to take down terrorism in those countries that have weapons of mass destruction. This act gave the government the power to spy on American to see every and anything from Cell phone records and electronic financial to see it you if you were send money to those countries that do acts of terrorism. Different newspaper organization were put out there that president order the NSA to secretly spy on American citizens on their privacy. There was a need to look at the basics on what the government was spy on so there are many points cell phone record, financial and email. There different people have different takes on the government position on why it need to be done but understand is why not tell the American people it does violate are right to privacy under the law. The only way to give a clear view of populace stance on both side of the spectrum is too give the opinions and writing of other forms of the media in the way that mainstream America formulates their opinion on the issue. So we will go into both sides on what the American people say and the government stance on the issues at hand. Most people agree that under the USA Patriot act that there are not enough check and balances. America people are not comfortable with government invading their privacy.
The Atlanta Journal constitution (2006) post an article on the secret things that The NSA where doing Michael Hayden was said on record that “NSA often gets FISA warrants for wiretaps. NSA employees also listen in on conversations without such warrants if they suspect links to terror groups”. Meaning that the government can go listen to any conversation that me and you are having at any given time. So is the government doing much more then just listening or is that their way of spying on American rights (P.A1) The Bush administration has a surveillance program that’s going to be challenged in a federal court involving American civil rights. The American Civil Liberties Union argues in court that without warrants that wiretapping violates the U.S. Constitution. NSA was coming under fire from the saying that the constitutional protections of American personal freedoms were being violated. President Bush would have to pled his case that he is trying to protect the country from terrorist attack that his mean is Justified (P. A1) The Fourth Amendment Of the constitution does prohibits “unreasonable Searches and seizures” so you do need probable cause. During Nixon Administration they did abuse the use of wiretaps that did create courts that you had to issue warrants. They prove their case for probable causes. The federal courts have covered up the NSA program cause of its highly classified operations (P.Al) End this article the government pretty explain their case why the search email and phone calls coming in and out the United states to protect the American people like it said you cannot protect anybody if you are dead. Believe that the did the right thing by going in and using Surveillance when needed.
Since September 11, their as been a strained of different idea on how to protect our country there was an idea of implementing national ID cards that would likely help control of the different criminals and would prove the citizenship of other. Most American are not ready for this next step feeling like the government is in are privacy enough as it is. The trading of ID card would lower are privacy and focus on other issue. The bush Administration made a statement that we don’t...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document