Preview

Indian Removal Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Act
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a law, enacted in 1830, that forced Native American peoples east of Mississippi to move to lands in the west. Under this law, the federal government provided funds to negotiate treaties that would force the Native Americans to move westward. This law was very controversial and few people agreed with the enactment. Since the 1600s, white settlers’ attitudes towards Native Americans were one of two outlooks. Some favored the removal while others wished to convert Native Americans to Christianity and turn them into farmers. Ultimately, absorbing them into the white culture. During the time of immediate displacement and dispossession of all Native Americans, former president Andrew Jackson was in office. Jackson thought that assimilation could not work and believed the only way to expand the white culture, was to move Native Americans from their lands to areas farther west (and pass the Indian Removal Act). Jackson believed the removal was “not only liberal, but generous.” His arguments were based on the rights of states to govern within their own boundaries. He stated that it would eliminate “all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the general and state governments on account of the Indians.” In addition, Jackson claimed that the Indian Removal Act would protect Native Americans against further removal from their lands. During this time, Secretary of war Lewis Cass defended Jackson stating, “The aboriginal population had accommodated themselves to the inevitable change of their condition.” Although people reasoned with Jackson, not everyone supported the enactment. People reasoned that the Indian Removal Act was “unfortunate but necessary,” while others said it was a “terrible injustice.” During this time, chief justice of Supreme Court, John Marshall believed that the Cherokee, a Native American tribe, had an “unquestionable right” to their territory. He added, “Until title should be extinguished by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First, Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act. According to a page about Andrew Jackson Administration in the Zinn Education Project Cherokee/Seminole Removal Role Play,the Indian Removal Act was a law passed by Jackson forcing Natives to leave their land and move to Oklahoma. The purpose of this law was to get farmers more…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson argued that unless the Supreme Court could keep Indian removal from happening, it will happen anyway, with his approval. this proves that Andrew Jackson strongly felt that states should hold jurisdiction over the federal government. He believed in a small federal government. Jackson felt that if the state of Georgia wanted to do the opposite of the law of the Supreme Court, then they have the right to. Jackson believed in keeping the federal government small, and was even…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Removal

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the early nineteenth century, an infant America was increasing in population and expanding in the South until settlers were faced with the dilemma of the Native Americans. Anglo-Americans had two very distinct stances on how to deal with southern Indian tribes, particularly the Cherokee. One side was eager for land and developed the idea that Indians were both racially and culturally inferior and a hindrance to American progress, while on the other hand, some Americans believed that the Cherokee tribe was a sovereign, independent nation and that moral responsibility required the United States to protect them.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson is a villain for passing the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing the Government to forcefully remove the Native Americans from Southern lands to Georgia. Jackson’s reasoning for this was that it will separate them from the whites, free them from power of the states, let them pursue their own happiness, and help them become civilized. His reasons did not make much sense to many because what if they were already happy where they were? What if they were already civilized? Jackson did not care. This changed a lot of people’s opinion of him especially because during the Worcester vs. Georgia case, the Supreme Court gave the Cherokee their victory simply stating that they did exist, but Jackson ignored it. He immediately wanted to enforce the law and made federal troops force out all the remaining Cherokee people living in Georgia, with only…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jackson became very concerned about the Native Americans. He was well liked by many chiefs due to his worrying for their welfare. He even took an orphaned Indian and raised him. Jackson was sure that as soon as the Indians adopted the white man’s’ habits, they would become complete citizens. But Jackson felt that since the white man wanted Indian territory and the two races could not cooperate, it would be best for the existence of Indians if they were removed.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Andrew Jackson was president of the United States, he was happy to pursue the news in the relation of the Indians Removal in the 1830’s. I believe Andrew Jackson is in a rush to remove the Indians because it will prevent differences between the General and State Governments on account of the Indians, and it will increase the size of civil populations.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Jackson proposed the Indian Removal Act, Chief Justice John Marshall and the Supreme Court rule against it. Jackson refuses to support Supreme Court rule and states "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it." Jackson goes on to pass the law, and in the process, he also proposed voluntary emigration in the west for the Indians. He felt that the Indians could preserve their dying culture in the west, by separating them from contact with the settlements of whites, granting them liberty from the power of America, and enabling these Indian tribes to "pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions".…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Removal In 1828, Andrew Jackson was presented as president. He wanted to remove Indians to have more land for the white people. When Jackson wanted to remove the Indians most cooperated, but not the Cherokee Indians. The Cherokee Indians refused to leave their land.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act DBQ

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was a passage brought into play in the mid-1830s. At the time, Andrew Jackson was the President of the U.S. who was responsible for signing the law into action. After a mere two days of discussion, Jackson signed the law. In Layman's terms, Jackson was about to go into the territory controlled by the Indian tribes in the south and essentially force them to vacate and transition to land that was located near the Mississippi River. One must understand that they territory controlled by these Indian tribes as aforementioned was their ancestral homeland. This was not an area that was recently occupied. It was in the control of the Indian tribes for decades upon decades. This is the land that they had grown up on and had called…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Cave, Alfred A.. "Abuse of Power: Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act of 1830." The Historian. South Florida: Wiley-Blackwell, 2003. 201-209. Print.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having people being treated poorly because of their skin color or their ethnicity today is not socially acceptable but back then, everyone did it. The Indian Removal act was an act created by President Jackson. He had these poor people forced from their property because of their ethnicity. The Indian Removal Act was not justified because the U.S. Government (President Jackson), lied to the Cherokee people about what they promised, President Jackson took away the Cherokee’s rights and the Cherokees had a lot of hardships while they walked the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act was not fair for anyone and shouldn’t have been created in the first place. So many people lost their lives and their rights so it was not justified.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson’s Indian removal policy in the 1830’s raised many questions as to whether or not it was constitutional. To start off the Indian removal policy was a law that authorized the president to negotiate with southern tribes for them to remove themselves to federal territory west of the Mississippi river in return for their native land that they occupied. Although, it was basically mandatory that the indians move from their lands there were different responses to the removal policy. One response was from the southerners who wanted to occupy the lands that the indians were on and the other was from the christian missionaries who felt the need to support the indians right to the land and the indians who lived on the lands who…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson was the one who made this removal. He called it the Indian Removal. In 1830, the Indian Removal act was signed. Native Americans were forced to leave their lands. The Choctaw was the first one forced to leave. Thousands of people died. The removal kept on going.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act went against the indian’s rights, and the indians did not want to move off their land. The Indians were forced off their land because of the Indian Removal Act. The Cherokee tried to go to court to fight the Indian Removal Act, explaining that the act was against their rights. The Cherokee did lose, and eventually were forced to follow the Indian Removal Act. The Native Americans that were moved also had rights to original land they lived on. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution that explained that the Cherokee had full control of the land. That did…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trail of Tears

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shortly after Native Americans attempting to adapt in the early 1800’s, the settlers weren’t satisfied and wanted to have them out of the south for good. The president at that time, Andrew Jackson, led campaigns for their removal as an Army General; winning over thousands of acres for farmers. As president he continued this crusade and signed the “Indian Removal Bill.” Despite the laws in place meant to protect the native people, President Jackson ignored the law. He chose to do as he pleased. (Humphrey)…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays