Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Incest Red

Powerful Essays
1853 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Incest Red
Although the "new information" that changed Aberle et al.'s minds indicated that inbreeding was at least as dangerous as Bittles's estimates imply, they rejected the possibility that primitive man recognized this danger.

Law and instinct. In Sir James's words, It is not easy to see why any deep human instinct should need to be reinforced by law. There is no law commanding men to eat or drink or forbidding them to put their hands in the fire.

The law only forbids men to do what their instincts incline them to do; what nature itself prohibits and punishes, it would be superfluous for the law to prohibit and punish. Crime and natural propensity. Accordingly, we may always safely assume that crimes forbidden by law are crimes that many men have a natural propensity to commit. If there was no such propensity there would be no such crimes, and if no such crimes were committed what need to forbid them?

we ought rather to assume that there is a natural instinct in favour of it, and that if the law represses it, as it represses other natural instincts, it does so because civilized men have come to the conclusion that the satisfaction of these natural instincts is detrimental to the general interests of society.

"Nuer say that marriage to persons standing in certain relationships is forbidden because it is rual, incestuous," but E. E. Evans-Pritchard argued that "we may reverse this statement and say that sexual relations with persons standing in these relationships are considered incestuous because it would be a breach of the marriage prohibitions to marry them. I would hold that the incest taboo can only be understood by reference to the marriage prohibitions, and that these prohibitions must be viewed in the light of their function in the Nuer kinship system and in their whole social structure." Putting exogamy before the incest taboo led to the remarkable conclusion that the incest taboo is the means by which human beings transcended their animal nature.

Cooperation between families cannot be established if parent marries child; and brother, sister. A way must be found to overcome this centripetal tendency with a centrifugal force.

If persons were forbidden to marry their parents or siblings they would be compelled to marry into some other family--or remain celibate, which is contrary to the nature of primates. The leap was taken; a way was found to unite families with one another, and social evolution as a human affair was launched upon its career. It would be difficult to exaggerate the significance of this step. Unless some way had been found to establish strong and enduring ties between families, social evolution could have gone no further on the human level than among the anthropoids.

As Tylor has shown almost a century ago, the ultimate explanation is probably that mankind has understood very early that, in order to free itself from a wild struggle for existence, it was confronted with the very simple choice of "either marryingout or being killed-out." The alternative was between biological families living in juxtaposition and endeavoring to remain closed, self-perpetuating units, over-ridden by their fears, hatreds, and ignorances, and the systematic establishment, through the incest prohibition, of links of intermarriage between them, thus succeeding to build, out of the artificial bonds of affinity, a true human society, despite, and even in contradiction with, the isolating influence of consanguinity.27

It requires the elimination of some younger members from the family, in spite of emotional attachments, and entrusting these members to groups where stable relationships do not yet exist. It also requires that primitive man understand the advantages of exchange--or else must assume that familial exogamy and the familial taboo arose as a chance "mutation" and survived because of their adaptive character.29

They accepted the evidence indicating that inbreeding is injurious, but they also accepted Freud's claim that human beings are naturally inclined to mate and marry within the family.

The new organization would have collapsed in a struggle of all against all, for none of them was of such overmastering strength as to be able to take on his father's part with success. Thus the brothers had no alternative, if they were to live together, but--not, perhaps until they had passed through many dangerous crises--to institute the law against incest, by which they renounced the women whom they desired and who had been their chief motive for dispatching their father. In this way they rescued the organization which had made them strong.30

Discovering that his sister has no penis, every little boy fears that he will suffer the same fate if he persists in wanting his mother. And thus, if one can accept that fear of castration is universal, a natural preference for incest is turned into incest avoidance.

Thus, for Durham, what Williams calls the representation problem is not a problem at all. The incest taboo is not a representation. It is a creation.

Sexual reproduction seeks variety. Inbreed violates this doctrine. The most important biological cost of excessive inbreeding is that it negates the benefits of the genetic variation generated by sexual reproduction.

Scientists collaborating on the Human Genome Project have elucidated nearly all the DNA sequences of all the genes on all twenty-three pairs of chromosomes found in every human cell. It is a staggering achievement. But the excitement about what is being done should be greatly moderated. "The Book of Life," as one leading scientist called it, will not provide the complete story about human nature.

The human genome is like a cook's larder list. Working out all the dishes that cooks might make from the ingredients available to them is another matter. If you want to understand what happens in the lifelong process from conception to death, you must study the process. The starting points of development include the genes. But they also include factors external to the genome, and of course, the social and physical conditions in which the individual grows up are crucial.

The language of a gene "for" a particular characteristic is exceedingly muddling to the nonscientist--and, if the truth be told, to many scientists as well. What the scientists mean (or should mean) is that a genetic difference between two groups is associated with a difference in a characteristic. They know perfectly well that other things are important and that, even in constant environmental conditions, the outcome depends on a combination of many genes. Particular combinations of genes have particular effects, and a gene that fits into one combination may not fit into another. Unfortunately, the language of a gene "for" a characteristic has a way of seducing the scientists themselves into believing their own sound bites. The language rests on a profound misunderstanding.

While genes obviously matter, even a cursory glance at humanity reveals the enormous importance of each person's experience, upbringing, and culture. Nobody could seriously doubt the remarkable human capacity for learning from personal experience and from others. It is obvious that experience, education, and culture make a big difference, whatever an individual's genetic inheritance. Individuals are not like the dry Japanese paper fl

The notion that genes are simply blueprints for an individual human is hopelessly misleading. In a blueprint, the mapping works both ways: starting from a finished house, the room can be found on the blueprint, just as the room's position is determined by the blueprint during the building process. This straightforward mapping is not true for genes and individual human behavior patterns, in either direction.

Genes do not make behavior patterns or physical attributes. Genes make proteins. Each human has about 30,000 genes, each of which is an inherited molecular strand (or set of strands) that may be translated into a protein molecule (or part of one). The proteins are crucial collectively to the functioning of each cell in the body. Some proteins are enzymes, controlling biochemical reactions, while others form the physical structures of the cell. These protein products of genes work not in isolation but in a cellular environment created by the conditions of the local environment and by the expression of other genes. Each gene product interacts with many other gene products.

Any characteristic of an individual, such as a behavior pattern or psychological attribute, is affected by many different genes, each of which contributes to the variation between individuals. In an analogous way, many different design features of a motor car contribute to a particular characteristic such as its maximum speed. A particular component such as the system for delivering fuel to the cylinders may affect many different aspects of the car's performance, such as its top speed, acceleration, and fuel consumption. A broken wire can cause a car to break down, but this does not mean that the wire by itself is responsible for making the car move.

The image of a genetic blueprint also fails because it is too static, too suggestive that adult organisms are merely expanded versions of the fertilized egg. In reality, developing organisms are dynamic systems that play an active role in their own development.

The idea that familiarity of a certain kind does reduce sexual attractiveness may be applied rewardingly to explain one striking feature of divorce statistics. For instance, in British women who married before the age of twenty, the proportion of marriages that ended in divorce has been approximately double that of the marriages of women who married between twenty and twenty-four. The difference is found at any time between four and twenty-five years after marriage. Many factors, such as differences between social classes in attitudes toward marriage, could explain or contribute to explaining the difference. However, early marriages may involve a great deal of intimacy but relatively little sexual satisfaction. Indeed, people often report that their early sex lives were relatively unrewarding. If the effects of habituation are not powerfully offset by rewarding sexual experience, the partner may lose his or her attractiveness and become the equivalent of a sibling.

If these ideas are correct, human incest taboos did not arise historically from deliberate intention to avoid the biological costs of inbreeding. Rather, in the course of biological evolution, two separate mechanisms appeared. One was a developmental process concerned with striking an optimal balance between inbreeding and outbreeding when choosing a mate. The other was concerned with social conformity. When these two propensities were put together, the result was social disapproval of those who chose partners from within their close family. When social disapproval was combined with language, verbal rules appeared that could be transmitted from generation to generation, first by word of mouth and later in written form.

The days of both genetic and environmental determinism are numbered. The center of intellectual activity is now focused on process and how the individual develops.

With very few exceptions, they accepted Sigmund Freud's contention that "an incestuous love-choice is in fact the first and regular one, and that it is only later that any opposition is manifested towards it, which is not to be sought in the psychology of the individual."

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Although Aristotle did not use the term ‘natural law’ many medieval philosophers considered him as one of the first exponents of the fundamentals of natural law. Stoic philosophy was the first to introduce the term ‘natural law’ with the Stoics emphasising nature and the moral requirement to accept and conform to what is given in nature. This Greek philosophy spanned several centuries and greatly influenced the Roman philosopher Cicero. Cicero (d. 43BC) was a strong advocate of natural law and spoke of natural law as the innate power of reason to direct action. Catholic natural law theory was formulated by St. Thomas Aquinas over seven centuries ago. He identified one fundamental norm of natural law: do good and avoid evil. Doing good in this context is following reason’s lead to actualise human…

    • 2320 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Color of Family Ties

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This paper is depends on an essay, The Color of Family Ties, from the book Rereading American. The essay, The Color of Family Ties, has carried on the comparison in the difference of race, class, gender and extended family involvement to Whites family, Blacks family and Latinos family to find their relationships between their kinships.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As an ethical theory, natural law has a number of strengths; it allows Christians today, using their human reason to guide them, live as God intends them to live. However it can be argued that is has a number of weaknesses also, for example its religious underpinning.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, others believe that people only follow the rules of the law because they do not want to get into trouble and face up to any punishments. They believe without the law ethics and morals would not exist. This means that, for example, murder or rape would be socially accepted because there is no one to say it is wrong. Therefore the only reason people don’t do these unacceptable things is so they do not have to take any consequences such as going to court or prison.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PHL 612: Philosophy of Law

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages

    PHL 612 Philosophy of Law [Calendar Description]: What is law? What makes something a legal norm? Should citizens always obey the law? What is the relationship between law and morality? This course will explore competing theories of law, such as natural law and positivism, and touch on crucial debates over civil disobedience, purposes of punishment, and interpretation of legal texts. It will deal with contemporary controversies over the legal regulation of human behaviour, for instance in matters of sexual morality.…

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law is good. Man, in his needs, has different motivations for law in society. His secular needs require striving for justice, social stability, and punishment. However, in the area of religious influence, law should promote morality so that believers can get close to God or be separated and condemned by God. As man and society evolves, the purpose of law has remained the same – to punish and deter.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural law was thought of by a 13th century monk called Thomas Aquinas. He was inspired by a Greek a posteriori philosopher called Aristotle who came up with the efficient cause and believed that a humans purpose is to reach eudaimonia. Aristotle's thoughts were inspired by the stoics who were a group of Greek philosophers who believed God is everywhere and in everyone there is a divine spark. Natural law is based on the belief that everyone has a natural sense that 'good is to be done and evil avoided' which somse call human nature. It is what directs our conscience and if applied with reason to a situation will lead to the right outcome.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal law is a construct of the government, enforced through tangible measures. In a democratic society, the government is elected by the citizens, and as such, laws are generally conceived with the aim to reflect whatever ethical or moral standards are presently acceptable. However, in order to be truly effective, some legislation must circumvent current sociological viewpoints in order to create laws that are genuinely in the best interests of society. This results in a delicate balancing act, as lawmakers attempt to weigh the views of the majority against the need for laws to be both reasoned and objective.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Natural Law has roots that stem back to Ancient Greece, and it was Aristotle who really created the approach. It was also depicted in Sophocles’ play Antigone, where the protagonist claims her right to bury her brother despite the King (Creon) ordering that he be fed to dogs. Antigone, (the protagonist) proclaimed this because she believed that there was a higher law than the King’s, particularly, Natural Law. However, it was not until the 13th Century until Thomas Aquinas developed its key features, that it was actually more widely recognised as a moral theory. When we focus on the recipient of the natural law, that is, us human beings, the proposition of Aquinas's natural law theory that comes to the forefront is that the Natural law establishes the basic principles of practical rationality for human beings, and has this status by Nature. These are to be followed universally, as Cicero puts it; it is ‘one eternal and unchangeable law will be valid for all nations and all times’.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The theory of natural law originates from Aristotle’s idea of goodness as fitness for purpose and stoic’s concept of a universal law of reason which is in agreement with nature. What we now call human nature. This point is then furthered by Aquinas who agrees with the argument but furthers it by linking it with his Christian belief by saying following this law is equivalent to following the command of God as human nature is in us inbuilt into us from when God created us.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reason in which they are born, some men do, in fact, break or reject this law,…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economics Quiz

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which of the following is not one of the four primary public policy objectives furthered by laws and regulations applicable to U.S. business?…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I am honored to be among the lecturers in this series on natural law. Many of the speakers are among my heroes and friends. One of my heroes, Alasdair MacIntyre, used one of his favorite terms in his talk: he spoke of "plain persons" and their grasp of morality and natural law in contradistinction to the experts and professional philosophers and their grasp of these matters. A few years ago in Dallas he gave a talk entitled "Do plain persons need to be moral philosophers?" When I was asked to give the response to his talk, I was most honored because I considered Prof. MacIntyre one of the foremost moral philosophers in the world and it was a thrill to comment on his work. I felt dreadfully underqualified — I felt like some high school kid going up against Larry Bird — until I realized that I need not respond as an expert, as a moral philosopher of his caliber, but that I could respond as the quintessential plain person — for that is what I am. After all, I am Janet Smith, daughter of John and Anne Smith; I grew up at 5 Hill Street and went to Home Street School — I could go on but it is all very plain.The point I am making here is not merely a flip one — designed to ease us into more serious matters through an attempt at humor. There is a serious point here — natural law, is the "plain person's" morality — in a sense it is simply plain old common sense. There are profound and sophisticated ways at explaining natural law, but the practiceof reasoning in accord with natural law principals, according to the theory itself, is natural to plain persons — that is, natural to all mankind for natural law holds that many of the most fundamental principles of moral reasoning are obvious, that is easily known by all. Yet, in spite of the plain commonsensicalness of natural law, it can seem shocking and provocative in many ways, for like natural law, plain old common sense does not command a lot of followers these days and can…

    • 6621 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man has a spirit and a carnal body. If instinct takes over, the carnal body relies on what is best for the body. The apostle Paul refers to this as, “fulfilling the lust of the flesh” in Galatians 5:16. Animals have instincts, but we are different from animals in that we have emotional intellect, we can re-train ourselves, and we can think about the consequences of our actions. A legal issue may become illegal if I rely on my instinct because my instinct is not always right. In order to have the correct values, I have to apply the…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We would need to revisit theories about natural law and learn them with the basic concepts of what is right and what is wrong [Kries, 2007]. According to Kries (2007) the problem with natural law is that each human being knows the natural law, but it is in interpreting and have a written codified piece of work that makes natural law a problem to be used legally. Until we are able to decide upon what is right and what is wrong morally, not legally natural law can always be interpreted in many different ways. If we were to think about natural law, it would be defined as a person’s sense of morale. Whether they think something is right or wrong. Now according to this, if we look at a murderer or psychopaths, in their minds their concept of natural law could be distorted into thinking what they are doing is morally right. According to Kries (2007) it is our human nature that our soul is what defines natural law to us and there are 3 parts to human nature: the body, spirit and soul. Our soul has to parts the higher part and the lower part. The higher part is reason and lower part is…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays