Preview

Incarceration or Rehabilitation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1941 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Incarceration or Rehabilitation
Incarceration or Rehabilitation for Non-Violent Drug Offenders Statistics have proven that incarceration alone is a monetary pitfall and does not deter the cluster of non-violent drug related crimes in this country. We need to create an alternative habilitation pattern for these offenders including an assessment of their mental health, specialized life skills training, and occupational employment assistance: in some cases, in lieu of incarceration and in others, in conjunction with incarceration. Ask yourself these questions: What affect would this type of intense program have on the recidivism rate? Would we be saving tax-payer dollars by producing graduates from drug rehabilitation programs instead of housing repeat criminals? To eliminate overcrowding in our prisons, reduce the soaring incarceration costs, and provide parolees the tools necessary to re-enter society in a productive manner, we must develop a rehabilitation system for the non-violent drug offenders. Throughout my research, there are many differing opinions on this subject depending on the source. Reading information from a psychologist, you see they tend to bend toward forced rehabilitation. Reading information from government policy-maker institutions, you see they tend to follow the prison sentence route. One thing is for certain, regardless of profession, all tend to agree on the need to revamp the current judicial system because it is not working and extremely expensive to the federal and state governments. Although some people believe that rehabilitating these offenders is much more costly, actually statistics prove the contrary is true. The cost of rehabilitation is much less than incarceration. Three of the states that have already implemented such programs are New York, Maryland, and California. After looking at the following statistics provided by McVay, Shiraldi, and Ziedenberg of the Justice Policy Institute, you will see that it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to do


Bibliography: Gottesman, Ann. Proposition 36: Drug Rehabilitation Instead of Jail for Non-Violent Drug Possession Offenders. Pasadena, California. 5 July 2011. Web. 16 January 2012. McVay, Doug, Vincent Schiraldi, and Jason Ziedenberg. Treatment or Incarceration? National and Findings on the Efficacy and Cost Savings of Drug Treatment Versus Imprisonment. Justice Policy Institute, Washington DC. January 2004. Web. 8 Feb 2012. www.justicepolicy.org. More`, Jared. Jail vs. Treatment for Drug Offenders. Treatment Solutions Network Drug Treatment and Recovery Articles. 31 March 2009. Web. 23 Jan 2012. www.treatmentsolutionsnetwork.com. Office of National Drug Control Policy. Who’s Really in Prison for Marijuana? Executive Office of the President of the United States. Washington DC. 2003. Web. 23 Jan 2012. Peele, Stanton. “Court-ordered Treatment for Drug Offenders is Much Better than Prison: Or Is It?.” Reconsider Quarterly, Winter 2000-1001: 20-23. 22 February 2011. Web. 20 Jan 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Given current trends in society today, the next era of corrections will be a hybrid model between the rehabilitation and punitive model. Thousands of studies show the positive and negative components of each of these models. The rehabilitation model was not properly measured years prior due to the lack of technology and society was critiquing the process because they were not able to see the benefits of the program first hand. The punitive model on the other had has had plenty of evidence on its success in increasing incarceration rates and creating issues with overcrowding and lack of funding. Nevertheless, each model has something positive they can bring to the table.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Mbuba (2012) after a person has been released, and they are labeled as a criminal, they are left with limited choices that results in them reoffending (p.232). Inmates need to learn once again what it is like to be social, they need to learn how to be in an environment where they could go as the please if they are not under parole. This does not mean that incarceration should not be used. In my opinion, incarceration should still be used. For the most violent offenders, they should be placed in maximum security, for other offenders, they can be placed in medium-security or minimum security depending on their charge. The changes that need to be made in the current system is allowing offenders the opportunity to have effective correctional intervention. There should be reentry programs that focus of the three core principles of offenders such as risk, needs, and responsivity. Which is why Listwan, Cullen and Latessa (as cited in Latessa and Holsinger, 2016) report that programs that fail to develop clear goals, plan for relapse, and use effective classification will fail ( 2006, p.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Paper Drug Courts

    • 1892 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Overall, substance abuse offenders have a recurring problem for the criminal justice system as a result drug courts are an important strategy to reduce incarceration, provide drug treatment and reduce recidivism among nonviolent offenders. Another key point is research study by the National Institute of Justice in 2009 called the Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation confirmed that Drug Courts reduced crime and substance abuse, improved family relationships, and also increasing employment and school enrollment. (Marlowe, 2010) Another key point is drug courts have affected the offender’s criminal behavior and substance use with mandated drug and alcohol treatment. Henceforth drug courts has been a popular diversion program for drug offenders since it’s began in Dade County Florida in 1989.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Third, the drug court program significantly increases the length of time an individual stays in treatment. Moreover, the intimidating authority of the criminal justice system with reverence to getting into treatment and remaining in treatment is extraordinary. Generally, between forty and eighty percent of drug abusers drop out of treatment program within ninety days, and between eighty and ninety percent drop out within twelve months. Contrastingly, approximately two-thirds of the individuals that are in the drug court program complete the program that lasts a year or more. Furthermore, the advantages of the drug court treatment programs have been displayed in urban and nonurban communities. Obviously, the drug-court movement symbolizes a move away from a criminal justice policy focused on punishing drug users to a policy that concentrates on treatment and healing. Experts in the field of drug-abuse treatment state that the mandated treatment approach will prove more successful than in situations in which the choice to go to treatment is made on a volunteer basis (Levinthal,…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: California Campaign for New Drug Policies. Prop 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act. Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://www.drugreform.org/prop36/fulltext.tpl…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most importantly, this approach would contain no punishment. As a society we must punish criminals for the harm they have brought to their victims, be it physical, financial, or emotional, and for the fear they instill in the law-abiding population. A civilized society does not tolerate or condone the victimization of others. Punitive sentences demonstrate this. Secondly, there is no evidence to suggest that a corrections system focused entirely on rehabilitation would deliver a high enough success rate to justify its implementation. In addition, many convicts do not want to be rehabilitated, as is evidenced by the many that refuse to participate in prison…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only has mass incarceration contributed to the depletion of economic resources, but it has also not been proven as an effective means of lowering crime rates. Our current prison system is designed to spend massive amounts of money on warehousing and punishing criminal to then just place them back into society without any of the tools needed to become a constructive member of society, thus resulting in criminal behavior to reoccur. Multiple studies conducted have manifested that “rehabilitation programs, education, therapy, and vocational training have a profound effect on not only bettering the inmate as an overall individual, but on society as well” (….) because these offenders can now become productive citizens that can add to the community.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the mid-1980s drug offenses increased primarily due to the pressure put on by the war on drugs (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014). This has contributed to overcrowding of prisons across America. In order to ease the overcrowding in prisons, rehabilitation through court sentenced drug treatment programs is a practical and economical alternative. Assigning offenders to applicable drug treatment programs would decrease overcrowding caused by drug offenses, lower recidivism rates, and provide savings for the criminal justice system.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abolish Parole

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Parole: This really is a popular subject in today’s criminal justice system. Several think it’s a chance to quit and others are fighting harder than ever before to maintain it. I believe among the most effective reasons to do away with parole is the overcrowding inside our prisons. Prisoner populations are extremely backed up that there is in fact a waiting list. The other major subject is it cost too much to accommodate inmates in jail. It can cost between $12,000 to $65,000 dollars to hold each prisoner locked up for just one year. Survey carried out by RAND deducted that sustenance misuse treatments is as much as7 times less expensive in decreasing some kinds of drug used in of household law enforcement. This has also been confirmed in real life scenarios. During 1997, the California Department of Corrections (CDC) enforced a fresh drug treatment plan. They have found out that for a two hundred bed center for example Corcoran II saves the DC 7.5 million dollars during 7 years by decreasing abusers come back to custody. “The Scribd (2012)”. Justice advocates argue that the indeterminacy inherent in the parole system is unfair because the board must make decisions based on what will occur in the future. Furthermore, they assert it is impossible to tell when an offender is rehabilitated. Incapacitation advocates also argue against parole. From their point of view, a sentence to prison prohibits an offender from committing more crimes in the community; parole release does not. Both of these perspectives have been influential in changing sentencing in many jurisdictions, and in the past thirty years sentencing changes have dramatically affected the use of parole. “Probation and Parole: History, Goals, and Decision-Making…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Increased penalties and incarceration are the main solutions of crime prevention for advocates who believe that drugs should be prohibited. Two main reasons for this are its deterrent effects and social harm factors (Levitt, 1996, Weatherburn, 2014). Levitt (1996), at the height of rapidly increasing speeds of incarceration writes that increased prison population is a threat to deter people from engaging in criminal acts due to an increased threat of imprisonment. Also, incapacitation will be a benefit to society as criminals are unable to commit crimes while incarcerated (1996). His study argues that for each prisoner released as a result of prison overcrowding, it is associated with an increase of fifteen crimes per year (1996). Conversely,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among problems the United States faces, one of the most prominent is the incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders. While the jailing of drug offenders does not seem so serious at first glance, under close inspection this proves otherwise. Among the flaws of this system, are the elevated crime rates that compare poorly to the rate of nations worldwide, the excessive budget wasted on housing these drug offenders, and finally, the sheer unconstitutionality of it all. By…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At 2.2 million inmates, the United States currently has the highest incarceration rate in the world. Approximately 1 per every 130 people are imprisoned and over 4 million people are on probation or parole. Despite the amount of people locked up, the U.S. has wildly fluctuating crime rates and the number of offenses per year has steadily been going up since the year 2000 (Henry). While the current prison system is highly debated amongst different groups, it is generally agreed that crime rates are still out of control. The current U.S. criminal justice system need drastic change because they currently fail to control crime, rehabilitation efforts are not working, and they unrightfully target people of color.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Combined with a type of life counseling, this overall experience could give these offenders some direction in their lives and point out their mistakes. First, this policy or program would only be available to2those who have not been convicted before and people who arelow-level, non-violent offenders; a good percentage of those incarcerated right now. Many times it is up to the defender as to whether they want to be helped and this makes it difficult for boot camps or other forms of intermediate sanctions. Therefore, to provide incentive, my policy would provide a risk/reward system. Successful completion of this program would result in the drug conviction wiped clean off their record. However, for those who fail to comply with the rules and overall philosophy or those who are convicted again after successful completion, would be punished twice as harsh compared to their first conviction. The rationale of this method is that a short jail period followed by probation could make the offender realize that the justice system is legitimate and the law must be followed. As in all policies, one could find fault in its intentions, but my boot camp policy for first time/low level offenders is beneficial if applied…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Solution to War on drugs

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The War on Drugs is extensively regarded as a requirement in the present society that has been laden with the burden of drug abuse, addiction, rehabilitation and increased crime rates due to drug abuse. War on Drugs has remained a deep rooted contentious campaign that has been debated over and over for several years in the search of a liable solution that can solve the problem permanently. The war on drugs affects every citizen through the legalization of drugs, increasing taxes for the rehabilitation and support of drug users and the increased level of crime due to drug use. As a result, there is all need for an appropriate solution that will completely solve the problem of drugs. Liberalization of drugs has been proposed as a viable solution to the war on drugs as it can offer a permanent solution to the drug war. Consequently, the paper seeks to address how liberalization of drugs is a perfect solution to the war on drugs.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do People Use Drugs

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: Bennett W. Fletcher, P. D. (2006). Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations. South Florida: National Institution Drug Abuse.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays