Preview

History of Human Rights Laws in the United States of America

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1048 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History of Human Rights Laws in the United States of America
In 1944, the US Supreme Court decided on the legality of the internment of Japanese-Americans by the United States government during World War II. The court unanimously decided that it is illegal for the government to intern a citizen who is found to be loyal to the United States (Bannai, 153). This was one of the first Supreme Court rulings in which the United States ruled to respect the rights of an un-trusted minority, and therefore the Endo decision was a turning point for human rights in America. Many of the violations to human rights in the United States that predate Ex Parte Endo would have been deemed illegal if they were to occur nowadays, in part due to the Endo decision. One of these violations to human rights was the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This Act called for the relocation of the Cherokee to Oklahoma, commonly referred to as “The Trail of Tears.” This violated human rights by forcing the Cherokee, who were well assimilated with the white American culture, to leave their homes and walk on foot to a new settlement out west. More than 4,000 of those who were forced to relocate died due to harsh conditions, disease, and exhaustion (Hansen, 1). The main reason for their removal was that white settlers wanted the gold that had recently been discovered on the Cherokee’s land; it was not due to any crime on the part of the Cherokee. If the same event were to happen today, it would be found illegal due the decision made in Endo because it can be said that the Cherokee’s relocation was a form of internment. There was no reason to suspect that any of them were not loyal to the United States. However, this would only be true if they were American citizens (Karst, 1416). Though, one could argue that by taking the Cherokee’s land and forcing them to live in Oklahoma, which is part of the United States, the government in a way forced the Cherokee Indians to become citizens. The decision made in Ex Parte Endo would make forced relocation of this kind both a


Cited: Bannai, Lorraine K. “Ex Parte Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944).” Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States. Ed. David S. Tanenhaus. Vol. 2. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. 152-155. U.S. History In Context. Web. 2 Apr. 2013. Hansen, Megan. “Following the footsteps of our Cherokee ancestors.” Faces: People, Places, and Cultures Sept. 2010: 38+. General OneFile. Web. 16 Apr. 2013. KARST, KENNETH L. “Japanese American Cases Hirabayashi v. United States 320 U.S. 81 (1943) Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214 (1944) Ex Parte Endo 323 U.S. 283 (1944).” Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. Ed. Leonard W. Levy and Kenneth L. Karst. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2000. 1415-1417. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 3 Apr. 2013. Sick, See G. “Iran hostage crisis.” Infoplease. Pearson Education, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2013. . Wood, Jennie. “How We’ve Changed Since 9/11.” Infoplease. Pearson Education, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2013. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On December 7, 1941 the Japanese Imperial Navy launched an attack on Pearl Harbor, the next day Congress declared war on Japan. Public opinion towards people of any “Asian” ancestry turned to racial hatred. Under political and public pressure Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 on February 19th, 1942 (Alonso 30). Enter one of the Dark times in American History, the imprisonment of its own citizens because of racial backgrounds. The act was attacked in the Supreme Court case “Hirabayasi v. United States,” though the Supreme Court upheld the order as “A means of National Security in war time” (Touro Law 2). In May of 1942 Fred Korematsu sued the United States. In a 6-to-3 vote the Supreme Court…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's Decision - The Supreme Court upheld the order excluding persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war zone during World War II. Three justices dissented. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court. He began with the observation that legal restrictions on the rights of a single racial group will always be “suspect” and that “courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.” However, they are not necessarily unconstitutional. The exclusion order imposed hardships “upon a large group of American citizens. …But hardships are part of war….Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” Justice Owen Roberts wrote in his dissent that this “is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Justice Robert Jackson noted that comparable burdens were not imposed upon descendents of the other nationalities (German, Italian) with who the United States was also at war.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War Two, Japanese-American citizens were placed into internment camps in the United States due…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Iran Hostage Crisis was when 52 Americans were held hostage for a year and 79 days in November 4th 1979 to January 20th, 1981 by University students in support of Supreme Leader Ruhollah Khomeini. This is a continuation from Operation Ajax effects on U.S. ties with Iran. (Also, known as the U.S. Embassy Crisis) During the 25 years the Shah ruled, many Iranians feared the autocratic leader. The Shah created the SAVAK police based from the CIA and the Israeli Mossad. Whoever disobeyed the law, was imprisoned or tortured. A “White Revolution” began from 1963 through 1978 imposing a sequence of reforms that opposed the traditional system. In January 1963, the Shah announced the White Revolution. Enforcing women’s’ rights, land reform, allowing non-Muslims to hold office, westernizing Iran, and much more were some of the initiatives for this revolution. Pahlavi imparted fear to the people and tried to modify Iran in every which way. During his time in office, people didn’t appreciate the Shah for his abuse of power and thought he was adversative to Iran’s society made up of 90% Muslims. They looked up to anti U.S radical religious leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Khomeini began to protest and give speeches about Iran’s’ Shah and his plans in January of 1963. Throughout the months of January through June, Khomeini gave speeches about the Shah and soon his crowd of people grew from nothing to many many people. In June 1963, authorities took Khomeini and detained him in Qom, Iran and took him to Tehran. This caused an uproar as his followers rioted. He was released in August but almost a year later, in November he was held in jail for half a year and was forced to apologize after he was released. Standing up for his views, Khomeini stood his ground and didn’t apologize. Later, he spent 14 years in exile and stayed in Turkey for less than a year and Iraq for the rest. While in exile, Khomeini…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents consistently showed that Japanese Americans had committed no acts of treason to justify mass incarceration. With this new evidence, a pro-bono legal team that included the Asian Law Caucus re-opened Korematsu’s 40-year-old case on the basis of government…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Franklin D Roosevelt issued and Executive Order that gave legislative power to the Secretary of War and Military Commander, allowing them to lock up any citizen of Japanese descent in whatever manner they deemed fit. This order, as the president of the United State, led to the internment of over 100,000 people who had their rights ripped out from under them, based on the idea that they “could be a spy or trying to sabotage our country”.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese Internment during World War II occurred because the government and American people reacted to the war with japan and attacks on pearl harbour by profiling all japanese…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US Foreign Policy and the Iran Hostage Crisis, edited by David Patrick Houghton, Cambridge University Press, 2001. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/lib/apus/detail.action?docID=201802.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Never is this more eloquently illustrated than during the Japanese internment. Hirabayashi, a conscientious objector to the internment procedures utilized by the government, breaks the curfew set by Public Proclamation #1 and turns himself into the authorities and is arrested and conviction was upheld in the courts on the basis that Japanese Americans are not truly Americans because they are unassimilable and set themselves apart from mainstream society. The case of Korematsu, a man who deliberately evaded evacuation orders, despite being rejected from a previous attempt to enlist, went to the Supreme Court. The main point of contention was whether or not the evacuation was Constitutional; it was found to be legal due to military necessity and Korematsu was convicted. In the case involving Endo, who broke no laws and did not initiate her case, she was illegally detained because she was not a military threat. The day before the judgment, the evacuation was rescinded. The case of Endo passed unanimously (Shah). Asian Americans not only respected the legal…

    • 2386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This issue was the Japanese Internment Camp. Hundred thousands of Japanese were forced to relocate away from their homes and incarcerated into a camp. That being said, more than half of the hundred thousands of Japanese were legal citizens of the United States; however, because of their Japanese blood, they are seen as the enemy of the United States. To summarize, more than hundred thousands of Japanese that were citizens of the United States had their right(s) stripped away because they were Japanese. This clearly did not set a good representation of who is an American. It was basically unfair treatment because of race. There have been many of these cases in the…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Internment Wrong

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Dictionary.com, Internment is a prison camp for the confinement of aliens, prisoners of war, and political prisoners. There are many different opinions on whether or not internment was the right choice after the attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7th, 1941, because even though the Japanese did the bombing, that doesn't mean that every Japanese American become a criminal and gets looked upon with suspicion. Even though there was hardly enough verified evidence for the opinion that's pro-internment, many people still believe that it was the right choice to do. This essay is going to show you both sides of the story and prove that internment was the wrong decision to make.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States was the first case in 1944 that questioned internment as a violation of the Fifth Amendment rights and it resulted in the Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of the incarceration (Lilly). At the time, the military claimed there was no way of distinguishing a national menace from an upright civilian, and so the Fifth Amendment rights were subordinate to the president’s war powers at the high point of World War II (Lilly). During a 1983 appeal of the Korematsu case judgment, hidden Navy intelligence reports from 1942 were discovered that stated, “there was no military justification for the President's action,” still, as 37 years had already passed, the reparation claims were denied due to the six-year statute of limitations (Pawalek; Hessbruegge). It would be decades until Japanese Americans were compensated for their government-issued trauma when Congress passed the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, which indemnified the remaining camp survivors with $20,000 each…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Polygraph Usage

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Frye v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 46, 293 F. 1013. No. 3968, (1923)…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. legal system is considered a developed one that consists of many levels of statutes, amendments, and precedence. Simple reference to the Constitution cannot provide complete justification for the existence of a rule. Instead, one must take into account the rule’s relation to the Constitution, previous interpretations of related rules, and the possible conflict this rule may have with the previous rules. Observation of these relations is…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays