Problem Statement-
For this POW, our task was to find the best formula for finding the area of any polygon that is formed on a geoboard. In order to do this, there are two formulas given to help you. One tells how to get the area of a polygon based on the number of pegs on the boundary. This works as an In-Out table, where In is the amount of pegs on the boundary, and Out is the area. The other formula tells how to get the area by having a polygon with exactly four pegs on the boundary. All you do is tell her how many pegs are on the inside. Using her formula, she can give you the area immediately. Using these two formulas for reference, we have to find a formula that anyone can use to find the area of any polygon by knowing the number of pegs on the boundary and interior.

Process-
The first two equations by Freddie and Sally were a preparation for the final, building up the information in order to find the "superformula".

For Freddie's equation, I drew an In-Out table, with the number of pegs on the boundary for the In/x value, and the area of the polygon for the Out/y value. With this table set up, I made some different polygons on geo-paper (attached), and plugged them into the table. I found the area for all of them by looking at the figure. However, just looking at the figure was not very accurate, so I looked for a pattern between the in and the out, and quickly found a formula that made sense, and I worked with it until I got a formula. This formula was x/2-1=y. This works in all shapes with no interior pegs, as the problem said. (In-Out table attached)

For Sally, I saw that another In-Out table would work the best, and drew one with the same guidelines. With this set up, I made some polygons on geo-paper (attached). I found that the In/x value is the number of pegs on the interior, and the Out/y value is the area. I then filled the table with a few values from the geo-paper, and saw a pattern that soon led to a...

...Problem Statement
My task was to find 3 equations, that would give me an answer, if I had certain information. The first was to find one that if you knew that there were four pegs on the boundary, and none on the interior, you could get the area. The second was if you knew that there were 4 pegs on the boundary, and you knew how many were on the interior, you could get the area. And last, if you had the number on the interior, and the number on the boundary, you could get the area.
Process
The first two equations, were a preparation for the final, building up towards the complete idea. This helped, because I could complete the first two pretty quickly.
For Freddie I drew a 3 column T-Table, with a drawing of the figure, the number of Pegs (in), and the Area (out). I looked for a pattern between the in and the out, and quickly found one that made sense, and I worked it into a formula. I got X/2-1=Y. Where X is IN (number of pegs) and Y is OUT (Area). This works in all shapes with no interior pegs, like Freddie described. I attached this T-Table.
For Sally I followed my luck of the 3 column T-Table, and drew another with the same guidelines. The figure, the interior pegs (in), and the area (out). After I filled in a few figures, and their properties, I noticed a pattern, and not long after, a formula, which worked for them. It was X+1=Y. This T-Table is also...

...Justcount the Pegs
Freddie Short has a new shortcut to find the area of any polygon on the geoboard that has no pegs on the interior. His formula is like a rule for an In-Out in which the In is the number of pegs on the boundary and out is the area of the figure.
Sally Shorter has a shortcut for any geoboard polygon with exactly four pegs on the boundary. All you have to tell her is how manypegs are in the interior and she can use her formula to find the are immediately.
Frashy Shortest says she has the best formula in which you make any polygon on the geoboard and tell her both the number of pegs in the interior and the number of pegs on the boundary and her formula will give you the area immediately.
Your goal in this POW is to find Frashy’s super formula but tou might want to begin with her friends formulas.
1 Begin with Freddy’s formula
a. Find a formula for the area of polygons with no pegs in the interior. The number of boundaries is the In and the Out is the area in the In-Out table.
b. Find a different formula that works for polygons with one peg in the interior.
c. Pick a number bigger than one and find the area with that number of pegs in the interior.
d. Do more cases like question c
2.Find Sally’s formula and others like it, as described...

...Jordan Hunt P.3
POW Write Up; JustCount the Pegs
Problem Statement:
For the POW: JustCount the Pegs, I had to try and find the best formula possible for finding the area of any polygon on a geoboard. There are 3 different formulas you have to find. The first two are formulas that will combine together and help you find the best or “superformula”. In order to find the first two, you will make in and out tables. You will find the pattern and then come up with a formula for it. For the first part, you have to find a formula that works for polygons with one peg in the interior. For the second one you have to find the formula for the area of polygons with exactly four pegs on the boundary. Using both of these, you then find a formula that will work for any polygon.
Process:
I started off by figuring out Freddie and Sally’s formulas. I had to find these two first in order to find the “superformula.”
In | Out |
3 | .5 |
4 | 1 |
5 | 1.5 |
I completed Freddie’s first. Freddie’s was the easiest to find because it was a technique I had used, without really knowing it. I started out by drawing a simple in and out table. In or x was the number of pegs on the boundary of the polygon. The out or y was the area of the figure. Then I made multiple polygons on geoboard paper. I...

...was going to make a chart 1-100 of all the patterns and numbers.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
Touchdown rest Field Goals = 3,8,13,18,23,28,33
I noticed that one the digits got into the teens there was a pattern of hitting all the numbers ending with 3 and 8.
Field Goal rest Touchdowns = 5,8,11,14,17,20,23,26,29
This pattern is a little bit more tricky, but i noticed that its just like the threes it goes up three every number but instead of zero being the starting number it is five.
Two Touchdown rest Field Goals = 3,6,11,16,21,26,31
After three the pattern hits every number ending in 1 and 6
Two Field Goals rest Touchdowns = 5,10,13,16,19,22,25,28
Like the others that have rest touchdowns they go up by three this patter has a start of 10.
Three Touchdown rest Field Goals= 3,6,9,14,19,24, 29,
after the pattern reaches nine the pattern hits every number ending with 4 and 9.
Three Field Goals rest Touchdowns= 5,10,15,18,21,24,27,30,
This ends up giving you numbers that are already taken.
Four Touchdown rest Field Goals= 3,6,9,12,17,22,
This pattern after hitting the number 9 the ending numbers will hit every...

...IMP2POW 3: Divisor Counting.
I. Problem statement:
This POW is all about finding information and patterns about the way divisors of certain numbers are found and expressed. In this POW when we talk about divisors we usually are counting the number of divisors that a number has. The divisor is a number that a number can be divided by, of course every number is divisible by every other number but in these problems we are only talking about whole, positive numbers. Every number is divisible evenly by one or itself so every number has at least 2 divisors. Numbers that have only 2 divisors are called prime numbers, only uneven numbers can be prime numbers, all even numbers except two have at least 3 divisors, the number itself, 1 and 2.
the task was to find information about different questions about divisors, to find patterns and to make our own question.
II. Questions:
What kinds of numbers have exactly 3 divisors?, 4 divisors? and so on.
Do bigger numbers necessarily have more divisors?
Is there a way to figure out how many divisors one million has, how many one billion has and so on without actually counting all the different ones? (in other words is there a system for counting divisors)
What is the smallest number with 20 divisors?
Choose your own interesting question: Do all the rules for divisors work the same with negative numbers?
III....

...POW 17- Cutting the Pie
Problem Statement-
If you were given a pie what is the maximum number of pieces you can produce from 4, 5, and 10 cuts? Keep in mind, that the slices do not have to be the same size and the cuts do not necessarily have to go through the center of the pie, but the cuts do have to be straight and go all the way across the pie. Include any diagrams you used to find the solution such as an In-Out table, or any patterns you found.
Process-
The first thing I did to try to find my solution was to finish the In-Out table given, which already told us the maximum number of pieces that could be made with 1, 2 and 3 cuts. So I drew two circles, and drew in four cuts in one and five cuts in another to find the maximum number of pieces that could be produced. After several circles for each I found that the maximum number of pieces you can produce from four cuts is 11, and the maximum number of pieces for five cuts is 15.
In-Out Table
In-X (Number of cuts) Out-Y (Maximum # of pieces)
1 22 4
3 7
4 11
5 16
So instead of trying to do the same thing t find out the maximum number of pieces for 10 cuts, I started looking for a pattern. I found that the difference between four and two is 2, the difference between seven and four is 3, the difference between eleven and seven is 4, and finally the difference between sixteen and eleven is 5. Based, on these results from...

...Pow2
Problem Statement:
There’s a standard 8 x 8 checkerboard made up by 64 small squares. Each square is able to combine with others squares to make other squares of different sizes. Our job is to find out how many squares there’s in total. Once you get all the number of squares get all the number of squares and feel confident with your answer you next explain how to find the number of squares on any size checkerboard. You will know you have the answer when no matter how what size board you have you can give a clear description of to easily compute the total number of squares. So basically what you’re doing is finding the total number of squares in a 8 x 8 checkerboard and pretty much finding an equation on how to find the total number of squares on any size board.
Process:
Alright so how do you find this answer? It’s not as hard as you think it is. Although it is kind of tricky on how to get the answer. What my first concern was, “This is going to take forever. I’m never going to get done.” I honestly thought I was going to get the wrong answer. So my first method was counting all the squares. I knew this was going to take forever. Then I literally...

...1. To find my conclusions I had to think about each part of the problem. When you know that one thing means you go on to the next part. When you figure out what that means you have to see how the two statements are related. If they are related then you can deduce a conclusion that makes sense.
2. Here are my conclusions for the 6 problems on page 7.
1. a. No medicine is nice
b. Senna is a medicine
Here I deduced that Senna is not a nice medicine. I think this because the first statement says that “no medicine is nice.” That tells me that all medicines are not nice. The second statement says “Senna is a medicine”. That statement is straight forward. When you put them together you can decide that Senna is a medicine and medicines are not nice. So Senna is not nice.
2. a. All shillings are round
b. These coins are round
Here I decided that no now conclusions can be drawn. The first statement says “All shillings are round.” That statement is clear. The second statement says “These coins are round.” This tells you the coin they have are round. When you put these statements together you can see some flaws. They say these coins but you don’t know if any of these coins are shillings. They can be other coins that are round. So you cannot deduce anything.
These coins are
3. a. Some pigs are wild
b. All pigs are fat
Here I decided that there are no conclusions that can be made. The first...