Preview

Immanuel Kant Metaphysics of Morals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immanuel Kant Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argued that moral requirements are based on a standard of rationality he dubbed the "Categorical Imperative" (CI). Immorality thus involves a violation of the CI and is thereby irrational. This argument was based on his striking doctrine that a rational will must be regarded as autonomous, or free in the sense of being the author of the law that binds it.

The fundamental principle of morality — the CI — is none other than this law of an autonomous will. Thus, at the heart of Kant's moral philosophy is a conception of reason whose reach in practical affairs goes well beyond that of a Humean ‘slave' to the passions. Moreover, it is the presence of this self-governing reason in each person that Kant thought offered decisive grounds for viewing each as possessed of equal worth and deserving of equal respect.

In Kant's terms, a good will is a will whose decisions are wholly determined by moral demands or as he refers to this, by the Moral Law

Kant's analysis of commonsense ideas begins with the thought that the only thing good without qualification is a ‘good will'.

While the phrases ‘he's good hearted', ‘she's good natured' and ‘she means well' are common, ‘the good will' as Kant thinks of it is not the same as any of these ordinary notions. The idea of a good will is closer to the idea of a ‘good person', or, more archaically, a ‘person of good will'

The basic idea is that what makes a good person good is his possession of a will that is in a certain way ‘determined' by, or makes its decisions on the basis of, the moral law

The idea of a good will is supposed to be the idea of one who only makes decisions that she holds to be morally worthy, taking moral considerations in themselves to be conclusive reasons for guiding her behavior. This sort of disposition or character is something we all highly value. Kant believes we value it without limitation or qualification.

First, unlike anything else, there is no conceivable circumstance in which we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mill and Kant Boat Problem

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant lays out his argument for morality and what one ought to do based on the idea that there is good in itself regardless of the circumstance. Kant seeks necessity and not simply a sufficient outcome for a situation. Simply put the end is not the most important test for morality, but rather the actions and intentions in themselves possess the trueness of goodness. Kant’s first premise is that morality should not be merely subject to the outcome, but rather should possess goodness in the action itself necessarily through reason, and not contingency as it is with experience. So in a sense, morality should be rational, “[T]he true vocation of reason must be to produce a will that is…good in itself, for which reason is absolutely…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is described as a conduct created by social groups such as religion or even those created on an individual level to affect one’s behaviour (Gert). This impacts every aspect of our lives. It is important to note that morality was not created by man but by a long term behavioural routine of people which led to the beginning of moral duty which influences the actions of people for the purpose of goodness alone, based on the standard of morality being practised (Shipunova). The standard and understanding of goodness varies from culture to culture and all of these changed with the changing times.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Good will according to Kant, is attempting to do the right thing in all situations. Kant believes that in every situation one encounters, there will always be good. I believe that although in some instances, there can be goodness; I also believe that there are certain situations in which only the bad can occur. For example, on the day of the terrorist attack on 9/11 in New York, the terrorist act was not morally correct in anyway. On his prime…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Kant, “it is a person that is the source of value. A person is of infinite worth, and what a person has, what a person does, what a person believes, what a person enjoys are all dependent upon the person’s and the person’s autonomy. Kant says that the virtues themselves evenness of temper, patience, can be turned evil if they are used for evil” (O’ Sullivan & Pecorino, 2002). By the words of Kant it would seem that he believes that people have the ability to be good and bad but the choice between good or bad can be impacted by the moral beliefs and nature of the person. A person can decided to be bad if the make up of them or behavior favor morally bad behavior. Kant seems to be touching on an idea that order that caused for morally wrong actions should not be followed.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant states that the only thing in this world that is “good without qualification” is the good will. He states the attributes of character such as intelligence, wit, and judgment are considered good but can be used for the wrong reasons. Kant also states that the attributes of good fortune such as health, power, riches, honor, that provide one happiness can also be used in the wrong way (7). In order to understand Kant’s view of moral rightness, one must understand that only a good will is unambiguously good without qualification, it is “good in itself”. To clarify, Kant states that “a good will is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing, i.e. it is good in itself” (7). To Kant, a good will is the only thing that gives action moral worth. Human beings were granted with reason not only to attain self-preservation and a state of happiness, but “its true function must be to produce a will which is not merely good as a mean to some further end, but it good in itself” (9). Human beings are called to exercise reason through duty to bring a universal good to all. This duty, living according to our highest reason, must be exercised through action that is beneficial and non-contradictory to all. Duty has three major qualifications for Kant. One must recognize that duty is good in itself when an action is performed out of the need of the completion of the duty itself, such as one who abstains from supporting a large restaurant corporation that inhumanely raise cattle or poultry, because he or she recognizes that it is a duty to not perpetuate unethical practice. Or one who carefully recycles their waste not because of the pleasure of being an enlightened “green” individual, but because of the recognition that it is “good in itself” to reuse products. The second…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this paper, I will contrast and compare two moral theories in attempt to uncover what one provides a better argument and can be applied as a universal moral code. The two moral theorists Immanuel Kant and J.S Mill have created two distinctly different theories on morality and how to develop a universal moral code. Both theories focus on intentions and consequences. Kant believes that the intentions and reasons of our actions can be measured and defined as morally correct, where as Mill believes that our intentions really play no role in morality, and that we should focus on the consequences and outcomes of our actions to evoke the most happiness for the most people. Even though both philosophers make incredibly different points, each encompasses strong arguments as well as issues with their approach. However, Kant will be successful in articulating a better universal moral theory through the use of his categorical imperative.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant's Humanity Formula

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant's way of determining morality of actions is quite different from other philosophers, and many find it extremely hard to grasp or implausible. The central concept of his basic test for morality found in his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals is the categorical imperative. "The representation of an objective principle, insofar as it is necessitating for a will, is called a command (of reason), and the formula of the command is called an imperative"(Kant, 24). In other words, an imperative is something that a will ought or shall do because the will is obligated to act in a way in which conforms to moral law. Imperatives can also be referred to as the supreme principle of morality.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Only duty performed without any thought of self-gain or alternative factors can be considered a good-will, because the action was performed as an obligation out of duty, not as a choice. The second obligation good will must follow in correlation with duty is that the outcome of the action does not matter, but the purpose behind the action does. If an action is performed with any other motivation besides the obligation to do so because of duty, then good will is not performed. Since the first and second propositions of duty are so closely connected to one another, they will be combined into an adjoining point for the rest of the essay. The third proposition of duty good will must follow is “duty is the necessity of an act done out of respect for the law,” no matter your personal thoughts about a particular law (Sandel 165). Thus, the universal law of duty, the moral law, is based on good-will. Moral law is “never to act in such a way that I could not also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Sandel 166). When one follows the moral law, they are just in their actions.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Kantian standpoint does not look into consequences like the Utilitarian standpoint; instead it looks at categorical imperatives. According to founder Immanuel Kant, “the rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences but on whether they fulfill their duty.” A Kantian belief is not based solely on what is for the greater good, but if something is seen as right or wrong to do. A good person is good because of the intentions that they have, whether enjoyable or not.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kants Moral Argument

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's moral argument can be summarised in 4 points. Point 1, a good will or a person with right moral intentions seeks to bring about the summum bonum. If we take our ethics seriously we can see that we want to achieve the summum bonum. Kant, however was adamant that people should not act nice to receive an award at the end of the act. Kant was convinced that an act is only morally good if it is done for its on sake and without any selfish thoughts. He believed that people should do the right thing because it is the right thing and not for any reward or praise.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral traditions are formed. Immanuel Kant has presented one viewpoint in The Grounding For The Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his ability to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another opinion as presented in the book, Utilitarianism that is seemingly in contention with the thoughts of Kant. What is most distinctive about the ethics of morality is the idea of responsibilities to particular individuals. According to Kant and Mill, moral obligations are not fundamentally particularistic in this way because they are rooted in universal moral principles. Mill and Kant are both philosophers whom have made great impact on their particular fields of philosophy and a critique of their theories in relation to each other may help develop a better understanding to them and their theories individually.…

    • 2746 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Key Philosophers

    • 4709 Words
    • 19 Pages

    According to Kant you are moral when you follow your higher self over your lower self, meaning that you follow your reason over your passions and inclinations. However, if you do the right thing for the wrong reason you are not a moral person; a true moral person acts out of principle, actions of any sort must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason (which is what gives an action moral worth). Actions taken using the ethics of duty lack self-interest, without a concern for the consequences and often without compassion, if doing your…

    • 4709 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In other words, people should do a right thing for all rational beings and in any particular situations. In addition, Kant says that moral principles should not trust empirical date and evidence to determine moral judgements. Kant says that actions have true moral worth when the action must be logically consistent and free from internal conflicts. His categorical imperative says that "we should always act in such a way that we can will the maxim of our action to become a universal law." He also avoids hypothetical prescription which is you should do if you desire to achieve your goal.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant begins this section by defining the concept of freedom and also stating the well as a cause of our action. He also said that having a will means being rational and having a free will means being free is the degree to which one’s actions are not determined by external forces, this is the negative definition of freedom and One is free the degree to which one determines one’s own actions, and this is the positive definition of freedom. A free will is what has the power to bring an action in a way that is well defined by the normal laws of nature that causes things to happen. We need laws to be able to act, for example, to act freely according to Kant is to act autonomously, and to act autonomously is to act according to a law we give ourselves.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The binding trait between Kant's first and second Categorical Imperatives is the element of reason. Both reinforce Kant's opinion that people have a duty to respect rational thinking. In the first formulation, Kant instructs people to use reason for the purpose of determining if an action is moral by the standard of it being good for everyone, or if it should be applied as a universal moral law. Kant believes it is critical to determine moral laws without the consideration of the goals or outcomes…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays