Preview

Ignorance Is Universal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1184 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ignorance Is Universal
In Shakespeare’s play, King Lear, there are many similarities between Gloucester and King Lear both share. Both characters experience almost identical situations during the play. Both men undergo suffering at the hands of their beloved children and other people closets to them and both respond to the unfortunate events in parallel ways. King Lear is held at the highest rank in Britain as king, he is a very honorable and noble man and is a very a loving father to his children and places trust and confidence in the people he surrounds himself with. Gloucester as well is held high in society as a loyal nobleman to King of Britain. He is trusting, caring and loves his children and friends as well as King Lear. Gloucester and King Lear equally fall short in their parental roles as fathers and fail to see the truth about their children but instead let their ignorance cloud their judgement as parents. King Lear and Gloucester mirror each other because both men foolishly believe their children lies. Being the ignorant king that he is, King Lear believes Gonerail’s false love, a proclamation towards him when she says “sir, I love you more than words can wield the matter; Beyond what can be valued, rich or rare” (1.1.56-58). In a similar Gloucester also foolishly believes Edmunds lies when he says, “It is a letter from my brother that I have not all o’er-read” (1.2.36-37). This shows that instead of taking their time to analyze the true meanings behind their children’s words, both Lear and Gloucester blindly go along with whatever is said to them. King Lear let’s his ignorance get in the way of his common sense, he should have known Gonerail’s true intensions behind her loving words after he had decided to split up his kingdom amongst his daughters. But instead he was so eager to assume the best of her because of the flattery he was receiving, which lead to his cloud of judgment. In comparison, Gloucester is just as ignorant as Lear. He immediately believed Edmund’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A parent-child relationship is described as the closest bond two human beings can have. Hence why being betrayed by a parent is an outcome almost as bad as death. In William Shakespeare’s beloved play King Lear, two characters suffer great parental betrayals; the youngest and favoured daughter of King Lear, Cordelia, and the legitimate son of the noble Gloucester, Edgar. When comparing the two betrayal’s, one must consider the following criteria: What affect did the betrayal have on both characters? Secondly, one must consider the reason for the parental betrayal and the role one played in it. Using these criteria, it is evident that in King Lear, Edgar suffered the greater parental betrayal.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. In this first scene of the play, how does Shakespeare establish the parallels between the stories of Lear and his daughters on the one hand and the story of Gloucester and his sons on the other hand?…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through ‘The Tragedy of King Lear’, Shakespeare represents a distinctive voice in which influences the way we perceive the role of power play in our world as it broadens our understanding of the universality and complexity of power play. Compared with the 21st century film ‘Brassed Off’, we are presented with an insight into the various means of attaining power and its ability to uncover the true nature of people within their struggle for supremacy and control. Shakespeare presents 'The Tragedy of King Lear' as the struggle for power and the political and filial machinations that the desire for power can create. Shakespeare focuses the distinctive voice around the central character King Lear who represents a conceited oppressor whose fall from power prompts the downfall of the Kingdom that he once controlled. The main cause of his demise is his failure to understand and possess a clear vision of the people around him. In Lear's eyes, he sees his eldest daughter Goneril’s facade to be a loyal and true expression, 'Sir I love you more than word can wield the matter/Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty', although Lear's inability to see the truth results in his manipulation and the banishing of his loyal acquaintances; his youngest daughter Cordelia and his dear friend Kent. Although Lear can physically see, it is the understanding, awareness and direction that he lacks and is blind to. In contrast to Lear being physically capable of seeing, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the form of vision that Lear lacks, and consequently Gloucester evades a corollary comparable to Lear's. Here Shakespeare presents his distinctive voice on power play through the depiction of the manipulation and motivation behind the characters struggle for sovereignty. His clever use of his characters and their relationships allows us to gain an insight into the condition of the human psyche throughout their individual attempts at power and highlights the complexities associated…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    True power is defined as self-awareness and self-control. Shakespeare portrays this idea through symbolic blindness and parallel structuring between characters. King Lear personifies the absence of personal power at the beginning of the play as he creates a “love contest” between his daughters, revealing his need for flattery to affirm his position. It is through his lack of self-awareness that he is vulnerable to manipulation and deception despite his initial authoritative power. Kent, Lear’s loyal companion who himself has personal power, attempts to help Lear “see” through his ego: “when majesty falls to folly...” he proclaims (1.1.144). The characters of Lear and Gloucester, both fathers, are parallel: eventually, Gloucester's eyes are plucked out in Act 3 Scene 7, in which characterises a literal and metaphorical blindness symbolic of his inability to "see" the truth about his children, like Lear. Towards the end, Lear states “I have too long taken notice of this” and it is through Edgar, Gloucester’s true son and Kent in disguise, that they come to a realisation. Edgar and Kent are the true characters with personal power that guide Lear into breaking through the “blindness” that has been as a result of his ego and avarice. We gain an understanding that true power is not a measurement of the authority or control one has over others but the control one has over one’s self.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In King Lear, the parallels between Lear and Gloucester are made clear. Both have loyal and disloyal children, both are blind to the truth and both end up banishing their loyal children and making their disloyal children their heirs.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, King Lear is an old foolish man who suffers several flaws in the same way, he is blind to the truth, and his inability to see the truth impacts his decisions making and his poor judgment. Throughout act one and two, King Lear decisions lead to several consequences, which alter his life and the lives of those around him. A few of King Lear’s flaws which demonstrates the great deed of one man’s consequences are, his actions due to his blindness, rash decision making and exhibits a great deed of pride and arrogance.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both characters suffered from a psychological blindness. Lear were unable to see his two daughters deceiving him, along with being unable to see Cordelia’s true love. He also portrayed this inability to see when he banished his loyal follower, Kent. When he was unable to realize that it was Kent in disguise as his servant, it only reinforces the theme. The consequences of his condition were that “tragedy id inevitable”, his blindness did not allow for him “to recognize the errors of his decisions” this is the direct cause for the kingdom being “torn apart” (Pappril 3). Gloucester also was seriously affected by this blindness. This caused him to not be able to see the true and honorable man that Edgar was, and not see the truly evil person that Edmund was. A part of these two heroes’ journeys was Lear and Gloucester’s ability to overcome this blindness, and regain a true sense for the moral flaws of themselves. Luckily, they began to see the true qualities of the people that they once trusted, or the people that they once rejected. Lear’s “eyesight” began to recover as the play progressed. He began to see the true colors of Goneril and Regan after they refused to let him live with them and locked them out of his castle during the perilous storm. He was faced with the fact that their eulogies that were given at the beginning of the play were nothing but lies to benefit their own selfish causes. Most importantly, Lear was gaining the aptitude to get passed Cordelia’s inability to adulate her father and see that her love truly was so vast that it was indefinable. Lear is able to overcome his haughtiness and results in him begging for forgiveness from Cordelia. Gloucester’s sight begins to make a reappearance in Act IV when he realizes that Edgar was Poor Tom and it was his son who saved his life. He then comprehends that Edmund was completely dishonest and that it…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear's Dementia

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Russell A. Fraser. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: New American Library, 1986. Print.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare in Lear, presents the notion that characters in great authority force suffering upon others in an effort to retain power, admiration, and status. Initially, Lear himself demonstrates this, appallingly treating Cordelia with an irrational snap judgement when he is embarrassed in court by his youngest daughters silence and lack of praise; “Here I disclaim all my parental care.” (1:1:107) This unjust sentence is highly ironic, especially for the audience, as dramatically we see transparent farce of Gonerill and Regan’s dedications of love, and the total truth of Cordelia’s. Due to the “infirmity of his age” (1:1:284) (Lear) the unjust pain Cordelia endures for his mistake is greatened, and due to this dramatic irony the audience is forever hopeful for some form of justice and resolution to come.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Slideshow

    • 417 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gloucester tells Edmund of a letter that warns that the soldiers are coming to start a war with Britain. Edmund takes this opportunity to hurt and betray his father Authority and Chaos King Lear is both a king and a father. Who gave his fortune to his unworthy daughters, Gorneil and Regan, based on the lies they told him. For this reason, King Lear has turned over Britain to chaos.…

    • 417 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare seems to be using Gloucester as a tool to provide more insight into the…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ageism in king Lear

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gloucester observes disastrous events occurring in the play, most notably the ones occurring in the kingdom. He notes that love can never last, friendships eventually break up, and brothers become enemies which eventually leads to chaotic behavior. Ultimately, these malicious acts break out into devastating events such as civil wars, the bond breaking between father and son, and lastly the betrayal of King Lear and his noble power. In addition to all of these spiteful acts, it is evident that ageism is also portrayed in the play about the King himself, especially at the end of scene one. The first sign of how ageism begins in the first act is King Lear’s debatable decision to divide up the kingdom between his three daughters, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. Eventually, Lear’s unwise decision causes chaos and havoc throughout the family, leading to multiple conflicts such as the banishment of Cordelia and the insulting comments about Lear’s old age and judgement.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mervyn is being compared to Gloucester as the father who is self-destructive who never really knew his own son. Michael is being compared to Edgar as the loyal son who remains devoted to his father even when he was essentially thrown away by him. Michael tried to rehabilitate his father much like how Edgar tried to teach Gloucester about suicide by pretending to help Gloucester jump off a cliff. Another comparison is that in King Lear Edgar feels close to his father and is distraught by his suffering but never reveals to his father who he really is this shows the distance between Michael and his own father despite their…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Building on the motif of battle, Shakespeare keeps the burning fight lit within Gloucester that shows determination, strength, and “fright” (11) that War also portrays except these characteristics lay beneath Gloucester’s deformity; his ‘War’ is buried in the “deep bosom” (4) of his ugliness. Although Gloucester has the drive and determination, he simply “cannot prove a lover” (28) because nobody, including himself,…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gloucester, much like King Lear, misjudges his children and chooses to side with the one who is least loyal. Before he became part of King Lear 's court, Gloucester was an adulterer and conceived a son, Edmund, out of wedlock. Edmund is so angry about his illegitimate status that he becomes bitter and plots against his brother by making it look as though Edgar tries to kill him and their father. Edmund obviously longs for a higher status in the kingdom because of how people of a higher hierarchy are viewed. The irony of this is that Shakespeare writes this theme into the play as it mimics real life. "Distinctions within the aristocracy and, more importantly, between aristocrats and commoners are enforced, both on stage and in public, through performance" (Spotswood, 265). Edgar is forced to leave the kingdom so that he is not killed. But the division of this family does not stop Edgar from staying loyal to his father. Through the years, he disguises himself so he can keep in touch with his father. "In their disguises, their imaginations, and their degraded condition, they reflect the sufferings of the weakest in their society" (Selden 145). Edgar stays by his fathers…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays