Humility In Dialogue
Humility and Dialogue
Rubi Garza
Texas A&M International University
Freire (2002) comes to see humility as something essential in order for dialogue to exist. The ability that people have to create the world is insignificant if they have the tendency to believe that they are different, and for that matter superior to others. I believe humility in a person is shown by their actions and practices. Humility in a person is seen when they unite with others, understand the differences that others may have, but know that others people’s views and lives are just as important as their own. Humility in Freire (2002) leads to being a better human being, therefore, the chances of dialogue being significant amongst everyone becomes highly effective. Understanding that humility is what brings people together, signifies equality …show more content…
Regarding multiplicity, this component is based on the idea that regardless of who you are, your status, gender, ethnicity, and etc., you realize that everyone comes from a different position in life (Cheney, 2010). The basis of minimalism is knowing your beliefs and what you stand for, yet, when entering in dialogue with others, you are open minded about their beliefs and opinions (Cheney, 2010). This brings to the table possible shared interests and/or new information, or different views that you may not have known about it. The historicity basically stands for understanding that everyone comes from different historical backgrounds (Cheney, 2010). Lastly, the component tainted grounded/dialogue confession states that the realization of acknowledging that you do not know everything is essential when entering effective dialogue (Cheney, 2010). A person must believe that there is much to learn and their differences from others do not make them any better than anyone
Rubi Garza
Texas A&M International University
Freire (2002) comes to see humility as something essential in order for dialogue to exist. The ability that people have to create the world is insignificant if they have the tendency to believe that they are different, and for that matter superior to others. I believe humility in a person is shown by their actions and practices. Humility in a person is seen when they unite with others, understand the differences that others may have, but know that others people’s views and lives are just as important as their own. Humility in Freire (2002) leads to being a better human being, therefore, the chances of dialogue being significant amongst everyone becomes highly effective. Understanding that humility is what brings people together, signifies equality …show more content…
Regarding multiplicity, this component is based on the idea that regardless of who you are, your status, gender, ethnicity, and etc., you realize that everyone comes from a different position in life (Cheney, 2010). The basis of minimalism is knowing your beliefs and what you stand for, yet, when entering in dialogue with others, you are open minded about their beliefs and opinions (Cheney, 2010). This brings to the table possible shared interests and/or new information, or different views that you may not have known about it. The historicity basically stands for understanding that everyone comes from different historical backgrounds (Cheney, 2010). Lastly, the component tainted grounded/dialogue confession states that the realization of acknowledging that you do not know everything is essential when entering effective dialogue (Cheney, 2010). A person must believe that there is much to learn and their differences from others do not make them any better than anyone