To begin with urgency, it is necessary to state that serious threats to human rights must be immediately tackled by international society, because acting fast can spare thousands of lives. History illustrates that sometimes military actions are more proficuous than talks. For instance, in one hand, the fast response of the Security Council to the crises in Libya was responsible for avoiding a lasting civil war, in which numberless people coud have died. On the other hand, the dismissiviness of international society in relation to the crisis in Rwanda had as a consequence more than 800 thousands casualties. Therefore, Rwanda and Libya proves that urgence justifies military intervention.
In spite of the urgency, proportion must be considered too. The mandates of the Security Council cannot wind up in “decapitations” of governments whenever a military action is needed to restore human rights. The indiscriminate use of force not only is illegitimate but also can feed the turmoil. For example, when the United States overturned Saddam Hussein, the situation in Iraq evolved to a large-scale civil war and thousands of civilians were killed. For this reason, proportion is essential to establish a long-lasting... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2012, 10). Human Rights and Intervention. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 10, 2012, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Human-Rights-And-Intervention-1168045.html
"Human Rights and Intervention" StudyMode.com. 10 2012. 10 2012 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Human-Rights-And-Intervention-1168045.html>.
"Human Rights and Intervention." StudyMode.com. 10, 2012. Accessed 10, 2012. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Human-Rights-And-Intervention-1168045.html.